Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206151 |
Resumo: | BACKGROUND: Backward extrapolation technique (BE) was used to estimate V. O2 from postexercise measuring, eliminating oronasal mask (OM) during the efforts. Despite its advantage, literature presents discrepancy in applied methods. Thus, the first aim of this study was to compare different mathematical criteria to estimate values of V. O2 during a supramaximal effort (V.O2PEAK), while the second aim was to verify the effects of OM on cycling performance. METHODS: Twenty-four male cyclists (35}6 years, 81.3}8.9 kg, 180}6 cm) performed three days of tests, with at least 24 h of interval between each test. Firstly, a graded exercise test was applied to determine V. O2max and your correspondent intensity (MAP). The second and the third day were destined to supramaximal efforts at 120% of MAP, performed with (Supramask) and without (Suprabe) oronasal mask (OM) in a randomized order. After Suprabe, OM was coupled, and BE was applied. Sixty-six values of V.O2 were obtained based on a linear regression fitting. RESULTS: V.O2peak can be estimated using different curve lengths. However, only curves between 20 and 60 s with extrapolation to 3 s or lesser shows at least one consistent criterion. The 60 s curve extrapoled to -3 s was the most accurate criteria (P=0.723; ES=-0.055; r=0.824; Bias=-0.36 and LoA=7.72 mL.kg.min-1). Performance was not impaired with OM and was similar in both condition (P=0.84, ES=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it was possible to accurately estimate V. O2 values of a supramaximal effort without any respiratory apparatus with a time-efficient analysis. Therefore, we recommended the use of a 60 seconds V. O2 curve analysis with a negative extrapolation for 3 seconds. |
id |
UNSP_a79e767089964627c1fbba57de210053 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206151 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cyclingCardiorespiratory fitnessExercise testExercise toleranceOxygen consumptionRegression analysisBACKGROUND: Backward extrapolation technique (BE) was used to estimate V. O2 from postexercise measuring, eliminating oronasal mask (OM) during the efforts. Despite its advantage, literature presents discrepancy in applied methods. Thus, the first aim of this study was to compare different mathematical criteria to estimate values of V. O2 during a supramaximal effort (V.O2PEAK), while the second aim was to verify the effects of OM on cycling performance. METHODS: Twenty-four male cyclists (35}6 years, 81.3}8.9 kg, 180}6 cm) performed three days of tests, with at least 24 h of interval between each test. Firstly, a graded exercise test was applied to determine V. O2max and your correspondent intensity (MAP). The second and the third day were destined to supramaximal efforts at 120% of MAP, performed with (Supramask) and without (Suprabe) oronasal mask (OM) in a randomized order. After Suprabe, OM was coupled, and BE was applied. Sixty-six values of V.O2 were obtained based on a linear regression fitting. RESULTS: V.O2peak can be estimated using different curve lengths. However, only curves between 20 and 60 s with extrapolation to 3 s or lesser shows at least one consistent criterion. The 60 s curve extrapoled to -3 s was the most accurate criteria (P=0.723; ES=-0.055; r=0.824; Bias=-0.36 and LoA=7.72 mL.kg.min-1). Performance was not impaired with OM and was similar in both condition (P=0.84, ES=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it was possible to accurately estimate V. O2 values of a supramaximal effort without any respiratory apparatus with a time-efficient analysis. Therefore, we recommended the use of a 60 seconds V. O2 curve analysis with a negative extrapolation for 3 seconds.Postgraduate Program in Physical Education and Sport School of Physical Education Sport of Ribeirão Preto University of São PauloFaculty of Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Centro Universitário Estácio de Ribeirão PretoCentro Universitário UNIFAFI BEInstitute of Biosciences and Postgraduate Program in Movement Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Physical Education Sports of Ribeirão Preto University of São PauloFaculty of Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Institute of Biosciences and Postgraduate Program in Movement Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Centro Universitário Estácio de Ribeirão PretoCentro Universitário UNIFAFI BELuches-Pereira, GabrielKalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP]Barbieri, Ricardo A.de Andrade, Vitor L.Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP]Gobbi, Ronaldo B.Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:27:26Z2021-06-25T10:27:26Z2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article519-526http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 61, n. 4, p. 519-526, 2021.1827-19280022-4707http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20615110.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-42-s2.0-85103683007Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitnessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:16:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206151Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:04:52.905220Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
title |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
spellingShingle |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling Luches-Pereira, Gabriel Cardiorespiratory fitness Exercise test Exercise tolerance Oxygen consumption Regression analysis |
title_short |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
title_full |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
title_fullStr |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
title_sort |
Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling |
author |
Luches-Pereira, Gabriel |
author_facet |
Luches-Pereira, Gabriel Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP] Barbieri, Ricardo A. de Andrade, Vitor L. Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP] Gobbi, Ronaldo B. Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP] Barbieri, Ricardo A. de Andrade, Vitor L. Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP] Gobbi, Ronaldo B. Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Centro Universitário Estácio de Ribeirão Preto Centro Universitário UNIFAFI BE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Luches-Pereira, Gabriel Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP] Barbieri, Ricardo A. de Andrade, Vitor L. Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP] Gobbi, Ronaldo B. Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cardiorespiratory fitness Exercise test Exercise tolerance Oxygen consumption Regression analysis |
topic |
Cardiorespiratory fitness Exercise test Exercise tolerance Oxygen consumption Regression analysis |
description |
BACKGROUND: Backward extrapolation technique (BE) was used to estimate V. O2 from postexercise measuring, eliminating oronasal mask (OM) during the efforts. Despite its advantage, literature presents discrepancy in applied methods. Thus, the first aim of this study was to compare different mathematical criteria to estimate values of V. O2 during a supramaximal effort (V.O2PEAK), while the second aim was to verify the effects of OM on cycling performance. METHODS: Twenty-four male cyclists (35}6 years, 81.3}8.9 kg, 180}6 cm) performed three days of tests, with at least 24 h of interval between each test. Firstly, a graded exercise test was applied to determine V. O2max and your correspondent intensity (MAP). The second and the third day were destined to supramaximal efforts at 120% of MAP, performed with (Supramask) and without (Suprabe) oronasal mask (OM) in a randomized order. After Suprabe, OM was coupled, and BE was applied. Sixty-six values of V.O2 were obtained based on a linear regression fitting. RESULTS: V.O2peak can be estimated using different curve lengths. However, only curves between 20 and 60 s with extrapolation to 3 s or lesser shows at least one consistent criterion. The 60 s curve extrapoled to -3 s was the most accurate criteria (P=0.723; ES=-0.055; r=0.824; Bias=-0.36 and LoA=7.72 mL.kg.min-1). Performance was not impaired with OM and was similar in both condition (P=0.84, ES=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it was possible to accurately estimate V. O2 values of a supramaximal effort without any respiratory apparatus with a time-efficient analysis. Therefore, we recommended the use of a 60 seconds V. O2 curve analysis with a negative extrapolation for 3 seconds. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T10:27:26Z 2021-06-25T10:27:26Z 2021-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4 Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 61, n. 4, p. 519-526, 2021. 1827-1928 0022-4707 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206151 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4 2-s2.0-85103683007 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206151 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 61, n. 4, p. 519-526, 2021. 1827-1928 0022-4707 10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4 2-s2.0-85103683007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
519-526 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129580688474112 |