Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Luches-Pereira, Gabriel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP], Barbieri, Ricardo A., de Andrade, Vitor L., Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP], Gobbi, Ronaldo B., Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206151
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Backward extrapolation technique (BE) was used to estimate V. O2 from postexercise measuring, eliminating oronasal mask (OM) during the efforts. Despite its advantage, literature presents discrepancy in applied methods. Thus, the first aim of this study was to compare different mathematical criteria to estimate values of V. O2 during a supramaximal effort (V.O2PEAK), while the second aim was to verify the effects of OM on cycling performance. METHODS: Twenty-four male cyclists (35}6 years, 81.3}8.9 kg, 180}6 cm) performed three days of tests, with at least 24 h of interval between each test. Firstly, a graded exercise test was applied to determine V. O2max and your correspondent intensity (MAP). The second and the third day were destined to supramaximal efforts at 120% of MAP, performed with (Supramask) and without (Suprabe) oronasal mask (OM) in a randomized order. After Suprabe, OM was coupled, and BE was applied. Sixty-six values of V.O2 were obtained based on a linear regression fitting. RESULTS: V.O2peak can be estimated using different curve lengths. However, only curves between 20 and 60 s with extrapolation to 3 s or lesser shows at least one consistent criterion. The 60 s curve extrapoled to -3 s was the most accurate criteria (P=0.723; ES=-0.055; r=0.824; Bias=-0.36 and LoA=7.72 mL.kg.min-1). Performance was not impaired with OM and was similar in both condition (P=0.84, ES=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it was possible to accurately estimate V. O2 values of a supramaximal effort without any respiratory apparatus with a time-efficient analysis. Therefore, we recommended the use of a 60 seconds V. O2 curve analysis with a negative extrapolation for 3 seconds.
id UNSP_a79e767089964627c1fbba57de210053
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206151
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cyclingCardiorespiratory fitnessExercise testExercise toleranceOxygen consumptionRegression analysisBACKGROUND: Backward extrapolation technique (BE) was used to estimate V. O2 from postexercise measuring, eliminating oronasal mask (OM) during the efforts. Despite its advantage, literature presents discrepancy in applied methods. Thus, the first aim of this study was to compare different mathematical criteria to estimate values of V. O2 during a supramaximal effort (V.O2PEAK), while the second aim was to verify the effects of OM on cycling performance. METHODS: Twenty-four male cyclists (35}6 years, 81.3}8.9 kg, 180}6 cm) performed three days of tests, with at least 24 h of interval between each test. Firstly, a graded exercise test was applied to determine V. O2max and your correspondent intensity (MAP). The second and the third day were destined to supramaximal efforts at 120% of MAP, performed with (Supramask) and without (Suprabe) oronasal mask (OM) in a randomized order. After Suprabe, OM was coupled, and BE was applied. Sixty-six values of V.O2 were obtained based on a linear regression fitting. RESULTS: V.O2peak can be estimated using different curve lengths. However, only curves between 20 and 60 s with extrapolation to 3 s or lesser shows at least one consistent criterion. The 60 s curve extrapoled to -3 s was the most accurate criteria (P=0.723; ES=-0.055; r=0.824; Bias=-0.36 and LoA=7.72 mL.kg.min-1). Performance was not impaired with OM and was similar in both condition (P=0.84, ES=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it was possible to accurately estimate V. O2 values of a supramaximal effort without any respiratory apparatus with a time-efficient analysis. Therefore, we recommended the use of a 60 seconds V. O2 curve analysis with a negative extrapolation for 3 seconds.Postgraduate Program in Physical Education and Sport School of Physical Education Sport of Ribeirão Preto University of São PauloFaculty of Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Centro Universitário Estácio de Ribeirão PretoCentro Universitário UNIFAFI BEInstitute of Biosciences and Postgraduate Program in Movement Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)School of Physical Education Sports of Ribeirão Preto University of São PauloFaculty of Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Institute of Biosciences and Postgraduate Program in Movement Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Centro Universitário Estácio de Ribeirão PretoCentro Universitário UNIFAFI BELuches-Pereira, GabrielKalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP]Barbieri, Ricardo A.de Andrade, Vitor L.Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP]Gobbi, Ronaldo B.Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:27:26Z2021-06-25T10:27:26Z2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article519-526http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 61, n. 4, p. 519-526, 2021.1827-19280022-4707http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20615110.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-42-s2.0-85103683007Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitnessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:16:03Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206151Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:04:52.905220Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
title Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
spellingShingle Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
Luches-Pereira, Gabriel
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Exercise test
Exercise tolerance
Oxygen consumption
Regression analysis
title_short Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
title_full Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
title_fullStr Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
title_full_unstemmed Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
title_sort Backward extrapolation technique: Analysis of different criteria after supramaximal exercise in cycling
author Luches-Pereira, Gabriel
author_facet Luches-Pereira, Gabriel
Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Ricardo A.
de Andrade, Vitor L.
Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP]
Gobbi, Ronaldo B.
Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Ricardo A.
de Andrade, Vitor L.
Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP]
Gobbi, Ronaldo B.
Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Centro Universitário Estácio de Ribeirão Preto
Centro Universitário UNIFAFI BE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Luches-Pereira, Gabriel
Kalva-Filho, Carlos A. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Ricardo A.
de Andrade, Vitor L.
Bertucci, Danilo R. [UNESP]
Gobbi, Ronaldo B.
Papoti, Marcelo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cardiorespiratory fitness
Exercise test
Exercise tolerance
Oxygen consumption
Regression analysis
topic Cardiorespiratory fitness
Exercise test
Exercise tolerance
Oxygen consumption
Regression analysis
description BACKGROUND: Backward extrapolation technique (BE) was used to estimate V. O2 from postexercise measuring, eliminating oronasal mask (OM) during the efforts. Despite its advantage, literature presents discrepancy in applied methods. Thus, the first aim of this study was to compare different mathematical criteria to estimate values of V. O2 during a supramaximal effort (V.O2PEAK), while the second aim was to verify the effects of OM on cycling performance. METHODS: Twenty-four male cyclists (35}6 years, 81.3}8.9 kg, 180}6 cm) performed three days of tests, with at least 24 h of interval between each test. Firstly, a graded exercise test was applied to determine V. O2max and your correspondent intensity (MAP). The second and the third day were destined to supramaximal efforts at 120% of MAP, performed with (Supramask) and without (Suprabe) oronasal mask (OM) in a randomized order. After Suprabe, OM was coupled, and BE was applied. Sixty-six values of V.O2 were obtained based on a linear regression fitting. RESULTS: V.O2peak can be estimated using different curve lengths. However, only curves between 20 and 60 s with extrapolation to 3 s or lesser shows at least one consistent criterion. The 60 s curve extrapoled to -3 s was the most accurate criteria (P=0.723; ES=-0.055; r=0.824; Bias=-0.36 and LoA=7.72 mL.kg.min-1). Performance was not impaired with OM and was similar in both condition (P=0.84, ES=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that it was possible to accurately estimate V. O2 values of a supramaximal effort without any respiratory apparatus with a time-efficient analysis. Therefore, we recommended the use of a 60 seconds V. O2 curve analysis with a negative extrapolation for 3 seconds.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T10:27:26Z
2021-06-25T10:27:26Z
2021-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 61, n. 4, p. 519-526, 2021.
1827-1928
0022-4707
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206151
10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4
2-s2.0-85103683007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206151
identifier_str_mv Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 61, n. 4, p. 519-526, 2021.
1827-1928
0022-4707
10.23736/S0022-4707.20.11326-4
2-s2.0-85103683007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 519-526
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129580688474112