Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-397-C http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112975 |
Resumo: | Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of Class III, IV, and V composite restorations using a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (2-ERA) and three one-step self-etching adhesive systems (1-SEAs).Material and Methods: Two hundred Class III, IV, and V composite restorations were placed into 50 patients. Each patient received four composite restorations (Amaris, Voco), and these restorations were bonded with one of three 1-SEAs (Futurabond M, Voco; Clearfil S3 Bond, Kuraray; and Optibond All-in-One, Kerr) or one 2-ERA (Adper Single Bond 2/3M ESPE). The four adhesive systems were evaluated at baseline and after 24 months using the following criteria: restoration retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, caries occurrence, postoperative sensitivity and preservation of tooth vitality. After two years, 162 restorations were evaluated in 41 patients. Data were analyzed using the chi(2) test (p<0.05).Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2-ERA and the 1-SEAs regarding the evaluated parameters (p>0.05).Conclusion: The 1-SEAs showed good clinical performance at the end of 24 months. |
id |
UNSP_abd8d17a603670d7722327b381f1450e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/112975 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior TeethObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of Class III, IV, and V composite restorations using a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (2-ERA) and three one-step self-etching adhesive systems (1-SEAs).Material and Methods: Two hundred Class III, IV, and V composite restorations were placed into 50 patients. Each patient received four composite restorations (Amaris, Voco), and these restorations were bonded with one of three 1-SEAs (Futurabond M, Voco; Clearfil S3 Bond, Kuraray; and Optibond All-in-One, Kerr) or one 2-ERA (Adper Single Bond 2/3M ESPE). The four adhesive systems were evaluated at baseline and after 24 months using the following criteria: restoration retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, caries occurrence, postoperative sensitivity and preservation of tooth vitality. After two years, 162 restorations were evaluated in 41 patients. Data were analyzed using the chi(2) test (p<0.05).Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2-ERA and the 1-SEAs regarding the evaluated parameters (p>0.05).Conclusion: The 1-SEAs showed good clinical performance at the end of 24 months.UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, BrazilUNESP Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Sao Jose dos Campos Sch Dent, Sao Paulo, BrazilUNESP Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilOperative Dentistry IncUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Barcellos, D. C. [UNESP]Batista, G. R. [UNESP]Silva, M. A. [UNESP]Pleffken, P. R. [UNESP]Rangel, P. M. [UNESP]Fernandes, V. V. B. [UNESP]Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP]Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP]2014-12-03T13:11:12Z2014-12-03T13:11:12Z2013-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article258-266application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-397-COperative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 38, n. 3, p. 258-266, 2013.0361-7734http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11297510.2341/11-397-CWOS:000318825300004WOS000318825300004.pdf3135367849609938Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengOperative Dentistry2.1301,180info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-06T06:07:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/112975Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:10:16.522560Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
title |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
spellingShingle |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth Barcellos, D. C. [UNESP] |
title_short |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
title_full |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
title_fullStr |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
title_sort |
Two-year Clinical Performance of Self-etching Adhesive Systems in Composite Restorations of Anterior Teeth |
author |
Barcellos, D. C. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Barcellos, D. C. [UNESP] Batista, G. R. [UNESP] Silva, M. A. [UNESP] Pleffken, P. R. [UNESP] Rangel, P. M. [UNESP] Fernandes, V. V. B. [UNESP] Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP] Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Batista, G. R. [UNESP] Silva, M. A. [UNESP] Pleffken, P. R. [UNESP] Rangel, P. M. [UNESP] Fernandes, V. V. B. [UNESP] Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP] Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barcellos, D. C. [UNESP] Batista, G. R. [UNESP] Silva, M. A. [UNESP] Pleffken, P. R. [UNESP] Rangel, P. M. [UNESP] Fernandes, V. V. B. [UNESP] Di Nicolo, R. [UNESP] Torres, C. R. G. [UNESP] |
description |
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of Class III, IV, and V composite restorations using a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system (2-ERA) and three one-step self-etching adhesive systems (1-SEAs).Material and Methods: Two hundred Class III, IV, and V composite restorations were placed into 50 patients. Each patient received four composite restorations (Amaris, Voco), and these restorations were bonded with one of three 1-SEAs (Futurabond M, Voco; Clearfil S3 Bond, Kuraray; and Optibond All-in-One, Kerr) or one 2-ERA (Adper Single Bond 2/3M ESPE). The four adhesive systems were evaluated at baseline and after 24 months using the following criteria: restoration retention, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, caries occurrence, postoperative sensitivity and preservation of tooth vitality. After two years, 162 restorations were evaluated in 41 patients. Data were analyzed using the chi(2) test (p<0.05).Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the 2-ERA and the 1-SEAs regarding the evaluated parameters (p>0.05).Conclusion: The 1-SEAs showed good clinical performance at the end of 24 months. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-05-01 2014-12-03T13:11:12Z 2014-12-03T13:11:12Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-397-C Operative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 38, n. 3, p. 258-266, 2013. 0361-7734 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112975 10.2341/11-397-C WOS:000318825300004 WOS000318825300004.pdf 3135367849609938 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-397-C http://hdl.handle.net/11449/112975 |
identifier_str_mv |
Operative Dentistry. Indianapolis: Operative Dentistry Inc, v. 38, n. 3, p. 258-266, 2013. 0361-7734 10.2341/11-397-C WOS:000318825300004 WOS000318825300004.pdf 3135367849609938 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Operative Dentistry 2.130 1,180 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
258-266 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Operative Dentistry Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Operative Dentistry Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128328035467264 |