One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Perdigão, Jorge
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP], Castilhos, Natália [UNESP], Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP], Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP], Cordeiro, Hiram J. D., Amore, Ricardo, Lewgoy, Hugo R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416
Resumo: To evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus.
id UNSP_92a8374aec40dfa92c9b8f2c2d8718e1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219416
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorationsTo evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus.Department of Restorative Sciences 8-450 Moos Tower University of Minnesota, 515 SE Delaware St., Minneapolis, MN 55455Division of Operative Dentistry Department of Restorative Sciences University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNDepartment of Operative Dentistry University of Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, SPUNESP, São José dos Campos, SPDepartment of Operative Dentistry University Bandeirante de São Paulo, São Paulo, SPBrazilian Army Dental Corps.Department of Operative Dentistry UNIBANDepartment of Operative Dentistry University of Mogi das CruzesDepartment of Biomaterials UNIBANUNESP, São José dos Campos, SPUniversity of MinnesotaUniversity of Mogi das CruzesUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University Bandeirante de São PauloBrazilian Army Dental Corps.UNIBANPerdigão, JorgeDutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]Castilhos, Natália [UNESP]Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP]Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP]Cordeiro, Hiram J. D.Amore, RicardoLewgoy, Hugo R.2022-04-28T18:55:33Z2022-04-28T18:55:33Z2007-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article125-133American Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007.0894-8275http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2194162-s2.0-34249687066Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Journal of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T18:55:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/219416Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T18:55:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
title One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
spellingShingle One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
Perdigão, Jorge
title_short One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
title_full One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
title_fullStr One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
title_full_unstemmed One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
title_sort One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations
author Perdigão, Jorge
author_facet Perdigão, Jorge
Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]
Castilhos, Natália [UNESP]
Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP]
Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP]
Cordeiro, Hiram J. D.
Amore, Ricardo
Lewgoy, Hugo R.
author_role author
author2 Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]
Castilhos, Natália [UNESP]
Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP]
Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP]
Cordeiro, Hiram J. D.
Amore, Ricardo
Lewgoy, Hugo R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv University of Minnesota
University of Mogi das Cruzes
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University Bandeirante de São Paulo
Brazilian Army Dental Corps.
UNIBAN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Perdigão, Jorge
Dutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]
Castilhos, Natália [UNESP]
Carmo, André R. P. [UNESP]
Anauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP]
Cordeiro, Hiram J. D.
Amore, Ricardo
Lewgoy, Hugo R.
description To evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-04-01
2022-04-28T18:55:33Z
2022-04-28T18:55:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv American Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007.
0894-8275
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416
2-s2.0-34249687066
identifier_str_mv American Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007.
0894-8275
2-s2.0-34249687066
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 125-133
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803649573057462272