Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Freitas Raso, Tânia
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Júnior, Ângelo Berchieri, Pinto, Aramis Augusto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;2
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230952
Resumo: The prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci (formerly Chlamydia psittaci) infection was assessed in 95 apparently healthy, captive Amazon parrots from three breeder collections in southeastern and west-central Brazil. Cloacal swabs from 95 birds were tested for chlamydial antigen, which was detected by direct immunofluorescence (DIF), and serum samples from 44 of these birds were tested for antibodies to C. psittaci using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The prevalences of active infection as detected by DIF were 16.7%, 22.2%, and 56.1%, and seroprevalences were 100%, 87.5%, and 60% in flocks A, B, and C, respectively. We can therefore infer that C. psittaci may be widespread in captive parrot populations in Brazil.
id UNSP_acc6776cbf013e173d4ecfa70c97fb4c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230952
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in BrazilAmazon parrotsBrazilChlamydiosisChlamydophila psittaciDirect immunofluorescenceDot-blot ELISAThe prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci (formerly Chlamydia psittaci) infection was assessed in 95 apparently healthy, captive Amazon parrots from three breeder collections in southeastern and west-central Brazil. Cloacal swabs from 95 birds were tested for chlamydial antigen, which was detected by direct immunofluorescence (DIF), and serum samples from 44 of these birds were tested for antibodies to C. psittaci using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The prevalences of active infection as detected by DIF were 16.7%, 22.2%, and 56.1%, and seroprevalences were 100%, 87.5%, and 60% in flocks A, B, and C, respectively. We can therefore infer that C. psittaci may be widespread in captive parrot populations in Brazil.Depto. de Patol. Veterinária Faculdade Cie. Agrarias V., 14.884-900 Jaboticabal, São PauloFaculdade Cie. Agrarias V.De Freitas Raso, TâniaJúnior, Ângelo BerchieriPinto, Aramis Augusto2022-04-29T08:42:52Z2022-04-29T08:42:52Z2002-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article118-121http://dx.doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;2Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, v. 33, n. 2, p. 118-121, 2002.1042-7260http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23095210.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;22-s2.0-0142099281Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:42:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230952Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-29T08:42:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
title Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
spellingShingle Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
De Freitas Raso, Tânia
Amazon parrots
Brazil
Chlamydiosis
Chlamydophila psittaci
Direct immunofluorescence
Dot-blot ELISA
title_short Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
title_full Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
title_fullStr Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
title_sort Evidence of Chlamydophila psittaci infection in captive Amazon parrots in Brazil
author De Freitas Raso, Tânia
author_facet De Freitas Raso, Tânia
Júnior, Ângelo Berchieri
Pinto, Aramis Augusto
author_role author
author2 Júnior, Ângelo Berchieri
Pinto, Aramis Augusto
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade Cie. Agrarias V.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Freitas Raso, Tânia
Júnior, Ângelo Berchieri
Pinto, Aramis Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amazon parrots
Brazil
Chlamydiosis
Chlamydophila psittaci
Direct immunofluorescence
Dot-blot ELISA
topic Amazon parrots
Brazil
Chlamydiosis
Chlamydophila psittaci
Direct immunofluorescence
Dot-blot ELISA
description The prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci (formerly Chlamydia psittaci) infection was assessed in 95 apparently healthy, captive Amazon parrots from three breeder collections in southeastern and west-central Brazil. Cloacal swabs from 95 birds were tested for chlamydial antigen, which was detected by direct immunofluorescence (DIF), and serum samples from 44 of these birds were tested for antibodies to C. psittaci using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The prevalences of active infection as detected by DIF were 16.7%, 22.2%, and 56.1%, and seroprevalences were 100%, 87.5%, and 60% in flocks A, B, and C, respectively. We can therefore infer that C. psittaci may be widespread in captive parrot populations in Brazil.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-01-01
2022-04-29T08:42:52Z
2022-04-29T08:42:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;2
Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, v. 33, n. 2, p. 118-121, 2002.
1042-7260
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230952
10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;2
2-s2.0-0142099281
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;2
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230952
identifier_str_mv Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, v. 33, n. 2, p. 118-121, 2002.
1042-7260
10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0118:EOCPII]2.0.CO;2
2-s2.0-0142099281
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 118-121
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965410435530752