Educação do campo no Plano Nacional de Educação - PNE 2014-2024: tramitação do projeto de lei nº 8035/2010

• Autor(a) principal: Pierobon, Jonas Renato Donizeti [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/128117; http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/cathedra/24-09-2015/000850715.pdf
• topic: Plano Nacional de Educação (Brasil); Education, Rural; Educação rural; Educação do campo; Educação e Estado; Ensino - Legislação; Projetos de lei; Planejamento educacional

This research analyzes the education field in Federal Constitutions (CF), the Law of Guidelines and Bases of National Education (LDB), the National Education Plans (NAPs), and the documents of the National Education Conference 2010 (CONAE), the latter includes the recent discussion and proposals for the PNE 2011/2020. The planning of education is a political act, not a neutral, and constitutes, like all legislation drafted under the auspices of the capitalist system, in an attempt to reconcile the dispute classes. The aim was to investigate whether the content of the proposals from the CONAE was contemplated in the PL 8035/2010 and the steps of it in the National Congress. Based on documentary analysis, we found that the PL in 8035/2010 did not reflect the set of decisions of CONAE, the substitute submitted by parliamentarians, the pressure of organized social movements and the context of its course, add some goals and strategies on education field which include the decisions of CONAE. Regarding to PNE 2014-2024 sanctioned without vetoes, in June 2014, weigh critical entities who demanded presidential veto points that show disagreement with the decisions of CONAE 2010 its strategies and goals that deal with rural education are based on new paradigm proposed by the National Movement of Rural Education. This presents the defense of the specificity of field education, suggests a pedagogy and content themselves to camp residents. We believe that this vision is fragmented and limited, ally themselves with postmodern pedagogies, dissolving the race classes and the historical struggle for public school as a catalyst for a new man and society