Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza [UNESP], Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP], Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP], Klein, Marlise Inêz [UNESP], Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203951
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203951
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188197
Resumo: Objectives To verify whether the Ultra Corega Cream and Corega Strip Denture Adhesive adhesives interfere in the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Lactobacillus casei in single-And mixed-species settings, and observe whether synergistic or antagonistic relationships between these species occur. Methods Specimens made from heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 550) were fabricated (n = 144) with a circular shape and standardized roughness (3.0 μm -0.3 Ra) and were divided into three groups: Without Adhesive (WA), with Ultra Corega Cream adhesive (CA) and Corega Strips adhesive (SA). These groups were divided into three subgroups each: C. albicans single-species, L. casei single-species and C. albicans with L. casei (mixed-species). Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation assays were performed in duplicate at four distinct experimental times (n = 8 per experimental condition). The amount of each microorganism on the surfaces of the specimens was observed by counting of the Colony Forming Units (CFU) per substrate. Additional specimens were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with 18 specimens being used in this analysis (n = 18), 2 per experimental condition (n = 2). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons were employed, using α≤0.05. Results L. casei (mixed-species) adhered more on the WA substrate than the CA, while C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) adhered more on the SA. C. albicans, both single-And mixedspecies adhered more than the L. casei (single-And mixed-species), regardless of the substrate. L. casei (single-species) formed more biofilm on the WA, but in its mixed cultivation, it had no difference of growth among the tested situations. C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than the CA, and the fungus formed more biofilm when compared to L. casei. In general, whenever a species was compared in its single-And mixed-species situation, no statistically significant difference was observed. SEM of biofilm formation assays demonstrated that L. casei single-species WA formed more biofilm than when the adhesives tested were used, and C. albicans (both single-And mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than on the CA. Conclusions (1) The two denture adhesives tested increased the adhesion of C. albicans but not of L. casei; (2) biofilm formation by C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) was increased on the SA; (3) Relations of synergism or antagonism was not observed between the two microorganisms studied.
id UNSP_bcbfbbdb49757de1a31d05679a794f79
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188197
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-speciesObjectives To verify whether the Ultra Corega Cream and Corega Strip Denture Adhesive adhesives interfere in the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Lactobacillus casei in single-And mixed-species settings, and observe whether synergistic or antagonistic relationships between these species occur. Methods Specimens made from heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 550) were fabricated (n = 144) with a circular shape and standardized roughness (3.0 μm -0.3 Ra) and were divided into three groups: Without Adhesive (WA), with Ultra Corega Cream adhesive (CA) and Corega Strips adhesive (SA). These groups were divided into three subgroups each: C. albicans single-species, L. casei single-species and C. albicans with L. casei (mixed-species). Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation assays were performed in duplicate at four distinct experimental times (n = 8 per experimental condition). The amount of each microorganism on the surfaces of the specimens was observed by counting of the Colony Forming Units (CFU) per substrate. Additional specimens were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with 18 specimens being used in this analysis (n = 18), 2 per experimental condition (n = 2). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons were employed, using α≤0.05. Results L. casei (mixed-species) adhered more on the WA substrate than the CA, while C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) adhered more on the SA. C. albicans, both single-And mixedspecies adhered more than the L. casei (single-And mixed-species), regardless of the substrate. L. casei (single-species) formed more biofilm on the WA, but in its mixed cultivation, it had no difference of growth among the tested situations. C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than the CA, and the fungus formed more biofilm when compared to L. casei. In general, whenever a species was compared in its single-And mixed-species situation, no statistically significant difference was observed. SEM of biofilm formation assays demonstrated that L. casei single-species WA formed more biofilm than when the adhesives tested were used, and C. albicans (both single-And mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than on the CA. Conclusions (1) The two denture adhesives tested increased the adhesion of C. albicans but not of L. casei; (2) biofilm formation by C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) was increased on the SA; (3) Relations of synergism or antagonism was not observed between the two microorganisms studied.Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza [UNESP]Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]Klein, Marlise Inêz [UNESP]Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:00:22Z2019-10-06T16:00:22Z2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203951PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 10, 2018.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18819710.1371/journal.pone.02039512-s2.0-850547763418921196002764597Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPLoS ONEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:57:17Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188197Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:57:17Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
title Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
spellingShingle Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
title_short Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
title_full Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
title_fullStr Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
title_full_unstemmed Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
title_sort Influence of the use of complete denture adhesives on microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by single-And mixed-species
author De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
author_facet De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Klein, Marlise Inêz [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Klein, Marlise Inêz [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Klein, Marlise Inêz [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Oliveira Junior, Norberto Martins [UNESP]
Marin, Danny Omar Mendoza [UNESP]
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin [UNESP]
Pero, Ana Carolina [UNESP]
Klein, Marlise Inêz [UNESP]
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]
description Objectives To verify whether the Ultra Corega Cream and Corega Strip Denture Adhesive adhesives interfere in the microbial adhesion and biofilm formation by Candida albicans and Lactobacillus casei in single-And mixed-species settings, and observe whether synergistic or antagonistic relationships between these species occur. Methods Specimens made from heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 550) were fabricated (n = 144) with a circular shape and standardized roughness (3.0 μm -0.3 Ra) and were divided into three groups: Without Adhesive (WA), with Ultra Corega Cream adhesive (CA) and Corega Strips adhesive (SA). These groups were divided into three subgroups each: C. albicans single-species, L. casei single-species and C. albicans with L. casei (mixed-species). Microbial adhesion and biofilm formation assays were performed in duplicate at four distinct experimental times (n = 8 per experimental condition). The amount of each microorganism on the surfaces of the specimens was observed by counting of the Colony Forming Units (CFU) per substrate. Additional specimens were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), with 18 specimens being used in this analysis (n = 18), 2 per experimental condition (n = 2). Two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons were employed, using α≤0.05. Results L. casei (mixed-species) adhered more on the WA substrate than the CA, while C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) adhered more on the SA. C. albicans, both single-And mixedspecies adhered more than the L. casei (single-And mixed-species), regardless of the substrate. L. casei (single-species) formed more biofilm on the WA, but in its mixed cultivation, it had no difference of growth among the tested situations. C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than the CA, and the fungus formed more biofilm when compared to L. casei. In general, whenever a species was compared in its single-And mixed-species situation, no statistically significant difference was observed. SEM of biofilm formation assays demonstrated that L. casei single-species WA formed more biofilm than when the adhesives tested were used, and C. albicans (both single-And mixed-species) formed more biofilm on the SA than on the CA. Conclusions (1) The two denture adhesives tested increased the adhesion of C. albicans but not of L. casei; (2) biofilm formation by C. albicans (single-And mixed-species) was increased on the SA; (3) Relations of synergism or antagonism was not observed between the two microorganisms studied.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
2019-10-06T16:00:22Z
2019-10-06T16:00:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203951
PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 10, 2018.
1932-6203
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188197
10.1371/journal.pone.0203951
2-s2.0-85054776341
8921196002764597
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203951
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188197
identifier_str_mv PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 10, 2018.
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0203951
2-s2.0-85054776341
8921196002764597
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv PLoS ONE
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1822183855878045696
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0203951