Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tebet, Jussara Maria [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ferreira de Souza, Fabiana [UNESP], Mello Martins, Maria Isabel [UNESP], Chirinéa, Viviane Helena [UNESP], Candido de Carvalho, Jaqueline [UNESP], Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP], Lopes, Maria Denise [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229706
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the cryopreservation effects on the semen of oncilla (Leopardus guttulus, n = 5, 15 ejaculates) and ocelot (Leopardus pardalis, n = 5, 17 ejaculates) and compare two extenders (commercial and non-commercial extender). An andrological exam was conducted (testicle measurements and penis evaluation), including semen collection by electroejaculation. After collection, the semen was assessed to volume, color, pH, sperm motility, vigor, sperm number in the ejaculate, viability, membrane integrity, and sperm morphology. Samples were centrifuged (300 g for 10 min) and pellet diluted in two extenders (TRIS/glucose/egg yolk and BotuCRIO®), packed into 0.25 mL French straws (20 × 106 spermatozoa/mL), equilibrated at 5 °C for 1 h (<0.5 °C/min), freezing in nitrogen vapor for 20 min. Thawing was achieved at 46 °C for 15 min. Thawed samples were evaluated to the same characteristics and ultrastructural analysis. There is no difference for extenders, but in ocelot the spermatozoa maintained higher quality after thawing. Major defects were increased in thawed samples, especially acrosome injuries, in both species. Semen contamination by urine was remarkable to oncilla (53% of the ejaculates) which can have reduced sperm cryoresistance of this species. Ultrastructural analysis endorsed morphological analysis under light microscopy and identified cells with acrosome vesiculation. In conclusion, the spermatozoa of ocelot were more cryoresistent and the extender commercial and non-commercial were suitable for their cryopreservation. Other extenders should be investigated for oncilla.
id UNSP_c18a2573fe7db5761ddb04391edac4e6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229706
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)Acrosome-injuryCatCryopreservationCryoresistencyWild-animalThis study aimed to evaluate the cryopreservation effects on the semen of oncilla (Leopardus guttulus, n = 5, 15 ejaculates) and ocelot (Leopardus pardalis, n = 5, 17 ejaculates) and compare two extenders (commercial and non-commercial extender). An andrological exam was conducted (testicle measurements and penis evaluation), including semen collection by electroejaculation. After collection, the semen was assessed to volume, color, pH, sperm motility, vigor, sperm number in the ejaculate, viability, membrane integrity, and sperm morphology. Samples were centrifuged (300 g for 10 min) and pellet diluted in two extenders (TRIS/glucose/egg yolk and BotuCRIO®), packed into 0.25 mL French straws (20 × 106 spermatozoa/mL), equilibrated at 5 °C for 1 h (<0.5 °C/min), freezing in nitrogen vapor for 20 min. Thawing was achieved at 46 °C for 15 min. Thawed samples were evaluated to the same characteristics and ultrastructural analysis. There is no difference for extenders, but in ocelot the spermatozoa maintained higher quality after thawing. Major defects were increased in thawed samples, especially acrosome injuries, in both species. Semen contamination by urine was remarkable to oncilla (53% of the ejaculates) which can have reduced sperm cryoresistance of this species. Ultrastructural analysis endorsed morphological analysis under light microscopy and identified cells with acrosome vesiculation. In conclusion, the spermatozoa of ocelot were more cryoresistent and the extender commercial and non-commercial were suitable for their cryopreservation. Other extenders should be investigated for oncilla.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Núcleo de Gestão de Programas NGP8/CTR8/DGR/CFB Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente de São Paulo, São PauloDepartamento de Cirurgia Veterinária e Reprodução Animal FMVZ Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP, São PauloDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias Universidade Estadual de Londrina UEL, ParanáSanto Amaro University UNISA, São PauloDepartamento de Cirurgia Veterinária e Reprodução Animal FMVZ Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP, São PauloFAPESP: FAPESP 02/03761–8Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente de São PauloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)UNISATebet, Jussara Maria [UNESP]Ferreira de Souza, Fabiana [UNESP]Mello Martins, Maria Isabel [UNESP]Chirinéa, Viviane Helena [UNESP]Candido de Carvalho, Jaqueline [UNESP]Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]Lopes, Maria Denise [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:35:25Z2022-04-29T08:35:25Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article56-62http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.004Theriogenology, v. 177, p. 56-62.0093-691Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22970610.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.0042-s2.0-85117120550Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTheriogenologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:35:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229706Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-29T08:35:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
title Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
spellingShingle Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
Tebet, Jussara Maria [UNESP]
Acrosome-injury
Cat
Cryopreservation
Cryoresistency
Wild-animal
title_short Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
title_full Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
title_fullStr Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
title_sort Assessment of thawed sperm quality from feline species: Ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and oncilla (Leopardus gutullus)
author Tebet, Jussara Maria [UNESP]
author_facet Tebet, Jussara Maria [UNESP]
Ferreira de Souza, Fabiana [UNESP]
Mello Martins, Maria Isabel [UNESP]
Chirinéa, Viviane Helena [UNESP]
Candido de Carvalho, Jaqueline [UNESP]
Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
Lopes, Maria Denise [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ferreira de Souza, Fabiana [UNESP]
Mello Martins, Maria Isabel [UNESP]
Chirinéa, Viviane Helena [UNESP]
Candido de Carvalho, Jaqueline [UNESP]
Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
Lopes, Maria Denise [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente de São Paulo
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
UNISA
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tebet, Jussara Maria [UNESP]
Ferreira de Souza, Fabiana [UNESP]
Mello Martins, Maria Isabel [UNESP]
Chirinéa, Viviane Helena [UNESP]
Candido de Carvalho, Jaqueline [UNESP]
Papa, Frederico Ozanam [UNESP]
Lopes, Maria Denise [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Acrosome-injury
Cat
Cryopreservation
Cryoresistency
Wild-animal
topic Acrosome-injury
Cat
Cryopreservation
Cryoresistency
Wild-animal
description This study aimed to evaluate the cryopreservation effects on the semen of oncilla (Leopardus guttulus, n = 5, 15 ejaculates) and ocelot (Leopardus pardalis, n = 5, 17 ejaculates) and compare two extenders (commercial and non-commercial extender). An andrological exam was conducted (testicle measurements and penis evaluation), including semen collection by electroejaculation. After collection, the semen was assessed to volume, color, pH, sperm motility, vigor, sperm number in the ejaculate, viability, membrane integrity, and sperm morphology. Samples were centrifuged (300 g for 10 min) and pellet diluted in two extenders (TRIS/glucose/egg yolk and BotuCRIO®), packed into 0.25 mL French straws (20 × 106 spermatozoa/mL), equilibrated at 5 °C for 1 h (<0.5 °C/min), freezing in nitrogen vapor for 20 min. Thawing was achieved at 46 °C for 15 min. Thawed samples were evaluated to the same characteristics and ultrastructural analysis. There is no difference for extenders, but in ocelot the spermatozoa maintained higher quality after thawing. Major defects were increased in thawed samples, especially acrosome injuries, in both species. Semen contamination by urine was remarkable to oncilla (53% of the ejaculates) which can have reduced sperm cryoresistance of this species. Ultrastructural analysis endorsed morphological analysis under light microscopy and identified cells with acrosome vesiculation. In conclusion, the spermatozoa of ocelot were more cryoresistent and the extender commercial and non-commercial were suitable for their cryopreservation. Other extenders should be investigated for oncilla.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29T08:35:25Z
2022-04-29T08:35:25Z
2022-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.004
Theriogenology, v. 177, p. 56-62.
0093-691X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229706
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.004
2-s2.0-85117120550
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.004
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229706
identifier_str_mv Theriogenology, v. 177, p. 56-62.
0093-691X
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.10.004
2-s2.0-85117120550
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Theriogenology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 56-62
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046748463038464