Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moda, Mariana Dias [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP], Briso, André Luiz Fraga [UNESP], Santos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208024
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188410
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding interface between a self-adhesive resin cement to in vitro eroded dentin. Seventy-two third molars were used and divided into two groups: sound dentin and in vitro eroded dentin. The in vitro erosion was performed following a demineralization protocol, in which the specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution for 2 minutes per cycle and remineralizing solution for 10 minutes per cycle for 9 days. Both groups were submitted to four dentin surface treatments: control group (without any treatment), 2% chlorhexidine, 20% polyacrylic acid, and 0.1 M EDTA (n = 9). Blocks of resin-based composite were bonded with RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement applied on the pretreated dentin surfaces. The teeth were sectioned into beams (1mm 2 ) and submitted to microtensile bond strength testing to evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin after 24 hours and 8 months of immersion in artificial saliva. Three specimens of each group were longitudinally cut and evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy to analyze the dentin/cement interface. Eroded dentin showed higher bond strength values when compared to sound dentin for the 2% chlorhexidine group (p = 0.03), 24 hours after adhesion. When considering eroded dentin, the 0.1M EDTA group showed higher bond strength values with a statistically significant difference only for the control group (p = 0.002). After 8 months of storage, the present results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two substrates for all experimental groups (p>0.05). Analysis of the microscopy confocal showed different types of treatments performed on dentin generally increased tags formation when compared to the control group. The eroded dentin showed a significant increase in density and depth of resinous tags when compared to sound dentin. The storage of samples for 8 months seems to have not caused significant degradation of the adhesive interface.
id UNSP_cb81be77af93f33e298460ed3e2d204c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188410
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitroThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding interface between a self-adhesive resin cement to in vitro eroded dentin. Seventy-two third molars were used and divided into two groups: sound dentin and in vitro eroded dentin. The in vitro erosion was performed following a demineralization protocol, in which the specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution for 2 minutes per cycle and remineralizing solution for 10 minutes per cycle for 9 days. Both groups were submitted to four dentin surface treatments: control group (without any treatment), 2% chlorhexidine, 20% polyacrylic acid, and 0.1 M EDTA (n = 9). Blocks of resin-based composite were bonded with RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement applied on the pretreated dentin surfaces. The teeth were sectioned into beams (1mm 2 ) and submitted to microtensile bond strength testing to evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin after 24 hours and 8 months of immersion in artificial saliva. Three specimens of each group were longitudinally cut and evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy to analyze the dentin/cement interface. Eroded dentin showed higher bond strength values when compared to sound dentin for the 2% chlorhexidine group (p = 0.03), 24 hours after adhesion. When considering eroded dentin, the 0.1M EDTA group showed higher bond strength values with a statistically significant difference only for the control group (p = 0.002). After 8 months of storage, the present results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two substrates for all experimental groups (p>0.05). Analysis of the microscopy confocal showed different types of treatments performed on dentin generally increased tags formation when compared to the control group. The eroded dentin showed a significant increase in density and depth of resinous tags when compared to sound dentin. The storage of samples for 8 months seems to have not caused significant degradation of the adhesive interface.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Department of Restorative Dentistry Araçatuba Dental School UNESP—São Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP–São Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Araçatuba Dental School UNESP—São Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP–São Paulo State UniversityFAPESP: 2014/11734-8Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Moda, Mariana Dias [UNESP]Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]Briso, André Luiz Fraga [UNESP]Santos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]2019-10-06T16:07:12Z2019-10-06T16:07:12Z2018-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208024PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 11, 2018.1932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18841010.1371/journal.pone.02080242-s2.0-8505720497004934798010836220000-0002-4100-5153Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPLoS ONEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T19:49:56Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/188410Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T19:49:56Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
title Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
spellingShingle Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
Moda, Mariana Dias [UNESP]
title_short Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
title_full Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
title_fullStr Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
title_sort Analysis of the bond interface between self-adhesive resin cement to eroded dentin in vitro
author Moda, Mariana Dias [UNESP]
author_facet Moda, Mariana Dias [UNESP]
Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
Briso, André Luiz Fraga [UNESP]
Santos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
Briso, André Luiz Fraga [UNESP]
Santos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moda, Mariana Dias [UNESP]
Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
Briso, André Luiz Fraga [UNESP]
Santos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bonding interface between a self-adhesive resin cement to in vitro eroded dentin. Seventy-two third molars were used and divided into two groups: sound dentin and in vitro eroded dentin. The in vitro erosion was performed following a demineralization protocol, in which the specimens were immersed in a demineralizing solution for 2 minutes per cycle and remineralizing solution for 10 minutes per cycle for 9 days. Both groups were submitted to four dentin surface treatments: control group (without any treatment), 2% chlorhexidine, 20% polyacrylic acid, and 0.1 M EDTA (n = 9). Blocks of resin-based composite were bonded with RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cement applied on the pretreated dentin surfaces. The teeth were sectioned into beams (1mm 2 ) and submitted to microtensile bond strength testing to evaluate the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin after 24 hours and 8 months of immersion in artificial saliva. Three specimens of each group were longitudinally cut and evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy to analyze the dentin/cement interface. Eroded dentin showed higher bond strength values when compared to sound dentin for the 2% chlorhexidine group (p = 0.03), 24 hours after adhesion. When considering eroded dentin, the 0.1M EDTA group showed higher bond strength values with a statistically significant difference only for the control group (p = 0.002). After 8 months of storage, the present results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two substrates for all experimental groups (p>0.05). Analysis of the microscopy confocal showed different types of treatments performed on dentin generally increased tags formation when compared to the control group. The eroded dentin showed a significant increase in density and depth of resinous tags when compared to sound dentin. The storage of samples for 8 months seems to have not caused significant degradation of the adhesive interface.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-01
2019-10-06T16:07:12Z
2019-10-06T16:07:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208024
PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 11, 2018.
1932-6203
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188410
10.1371/journal.pone.0208024
2-s2.0-85057204970
0493479801083622
0000-0002-4100-5153
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208024
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/188410
identifier_str_mv PLoS ONE, v. 13, n. 11, 2018.
1932-6203
10.1371/journal.pone.0208024
2-s2.0-85057204970
0493479801083622
0000-0002-4100-5153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv PLoS ONE
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046881828274176