Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Augusto, Marina Gullo [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP], Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP], Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP], Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201761
Resumo: Statement of problem: Manufacturers of the recently introduced nanofilled bis-acryl composite resins no longer recommend polishing to produce interim restorations; however, whether this advice is appropriate is unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the type of interim resin material, polishing procedure, and artificial staining on surface roughness, gloss, and color. Material and methods: Disk-shaped specimens were prepared from 1 unfilled acrylic resin (Duralay) and 3 bis-acryl composite resins (Structur 3—nanofilled, Systemp C&B—microhybrid, Proviplast—microhybrid). The specimens of each material were assigned to 2 subgroups (n=15): polished and unpolished. Surface roughness (Ra—μm), gloss (UB), and color (ΔE) were analyzed at baseline and after 14 days of artificial staining. Roughness and gloss data were separately analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and color by 2-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α=.05). Results: The baseline roughness of all materials was significantly reduced by the polishing procedure, whereas the baseline gloss was increased (P<.001). Only the unpolished Proviplast had a significant increase in Ra values after aging. Structur 3 had higher gloss than Systemp C&B and Proviplast. The acrylic resin had the lowest color change after staining. Conclusions: The polishing procedure produced smother and glossier surfaces for all the materials tested. The nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin material had higher gloss than the microhybrid bis-acryls tested, but it was not different from the acrylic resin. The 14 days of artificial staining did not promote significant changes in Ra or gloss values, except for Ra in the unpolished Proviplast subgroup, indicating excellent performance of the materials. The acrylic resin had the highest color stability.
id UNSP_cfbc4156d4fe9c1357b216cf4eb1997e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201761
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?Statement of problem: Manufacturers of the recently introduced nanofilled bis-acryl composite resins no longer recommend polishing to produce interim restorations; however, whether this advice is appropriate is unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the type of interim resin material, polishing procedure, and artificial staining on surface roughness, gloss, and color. Material and methods: Disk-shaped specimens were prepared from 1 unfilled acrylic resin (Duralay) and 3 bis-acryl composite resins (Structur 3—nanofilled, Systemp C&B—microhybrid, Proviplast—microhybrid). The specimens of each material were assigned to 2 subgroups (n=15): polished and unpolished. Surface roughness (Ra—μm), gloss (UB), and color (ΔE) were analyzed at baseline and after 14 days of artificial staining. Roughness and gloss data were separately analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and color by 2-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α=.05). Results: The baseline roughness of all materials was significantly reduced by the polishing procedure, whereas the baseline gloss was increased (P<.001). Only the unpolished Proviplast had a significant increase in Ra values after aging. Structur 3 had higher gloss than Systemp C&B and Proviplast. The acrylic resin had the lowest color change after staining. Conclusions: The polishing procedure produced smother and glossier surfaces for all the materials tested. The nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin material had higher gloss than the microhybrid bis-acryls tested, but it was not different from the acrylic resin. The 14 days of artificial staining did not promote significant changes in Ra or gloss values, except for Ra in the unpolished Proviplast subgroup, indicating excellent performance of the materials. The acrylic resin had the highest color stability.PhD student Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESPPhD student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESPAssociate Professor Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESPPhD student Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESPPhD student Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESPAssociate Professor Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Augusto, Marina Gullo [UNESP]de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:41:08Z2020-12-12T02:41:08Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.015Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.0022-3913http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20176110.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.0152-s2.0-85084841594Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:16:13Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201761Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-22T21:16:13Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
title Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
spellingShingle Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
Augusto, Marina Gullo [UNESP]
title_short Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
title_full Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
title_fullStr Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
title_full_unstemmed Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
title_sort Nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin materials: Is it necessary to polish?
author Augusto, Marina Gullo [UNESP]
author_facet Augusto, Marina Gullo [UNESP]
de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Augusto, Marina Gullo [UNESP]
de Andrade, Guilherme Schmitt [UNESP]
Caneppele, Taciana Marco Ferraz [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
description Statement of problem: Manufacturers of the recently introduced nanofilled bis-acryl composite resins no longer recommend polishing to produce interim restorations; however, whether this advice is appropriate is unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the type of interim resin material, polishing procedure, and artificial staining on surface roughness, gloss, and color. Material and methods: Disk-shaped specimens were prepared from 1 unfilled acrylic resin (Duralay) and 3 bis-acryl composite resins (Structur 3—nanofilled, Systemp C&B—microhybrid, Proviplast—microhybrid). The specimens of each material were assigned to 2 subgroups (n=15): polished and unpolished. Surface roughness (Ra—μm), gloss (UB), and color (ΔE) were analyzed at baseline and after 14 days of artificial staining. Roughness and gloss data were separately analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and color by 2-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc Tukey test (α=.05). Results: The baseline roughness of all materials was significantly reduced by the polishing procedure, whereas the baseline gloss was increased (P<.001). Only the unpolished Proviplast had a significant increase in Ra values after aging. Structur 3 had higher gloss than Systemp C&B and Proviplast. The acrylic resin had the lowest color change after staining. Conclusions: The polishing procedure produced smother and glossier surfaces for all the materials tested. The nanofilled bis-acryl composite resin material had higher gloss than the microhybrid bis-acryls tested, but it was not different from the acrylic resin. The 14 days of artificial staining did not promote significant changes in Ra or gloss values, except for Ra in the unpolished Proviplast subgroup, indicating excellent performance of the materials. The acrylic resin had the highest color stability.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:41:08Z
2020-12-12T02:41:08Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.015
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
0022-3913
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201761
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.015
2-s2.0-85084841594
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.015
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201761
identifier_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
0022-3913
10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.015
2-s2.0-85084841594
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790323972243456