Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Giácomo, Rômulo Guimarães [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Alves, Marlene Cristina [UNESP], Camara, Rodrigo, Pereira, Marcos Gervasio, de Arruda, Otton Garcia [UNESP], Souto, Sebastião Nilce [UNESP], de Moraes, Mário Luis Teixeira [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.002816
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178908
Resumo: This study aimed to test the effects of fertilization with organic compost from industrial production of pulp on the litterfall and nutrient input of monospecific plantations in a loan area. The treatments consisted of three doses of the organic compost D10, D15 and D20 (10, 15 and 20 Mg ha-1, respectively), mineral conventional fertilization (DAM) and no fertilization (D0) in land plots (N = 4/treatment/species; 15 x 12 m). Litterfall was monthly collected by two traps (0.72 m2/plot) and sorted out into leaves, twigs, seeds, flowers, fruits and others. We determined the input of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. There were no differences among the treatments and between species in terms of total annual litterfall. The higher nutrient input was obtained by DAM, followed by D10, in both plantations. The annual nutrient input was higher for the litterfall on the E. urograndis plantation.
id UNSP_d050bcb33d57434e8e4bf8321a05e738
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178908
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded areaEucalyptus urograndisMabea fistuliferaNutrient cyclingThis study aimed to test the effects of fertilization with organic compost from industrial production of pulp on the litterfall and nutrient input of monospecific plantations in a loan area. The treatments consisted of three doses of the organic compost D10, D15 and D20 (10, 15 and 20 Mg ha-1, respectively), mineral conventional fertilization (DAM) and no fertilization (D0) in land plots (N = 4/treatment/species; 15 x 12 m). Litterfall was monthly collected by two traps (0.72 m2/plot) and sorted out into leaves, twigs, seeds, flowers, fruits and others. We determined the input of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. There were no differences among the treatments and between species in terms of total annual litterfall. The higher nutrient input was obtained by DAM, followed by D10, in both plantations. The annual nutrient input was higher for the litterfall on the E. urograndis plantation.Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - UNESPUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJUniversidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho - UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJGiácomo, Rômulo Guimarães [UNESP]Alves, Marlene Cristina [UNESP]Camara, RodrigoPereira, Marcos Gervasiode Arruda, Otton Garcia [UNESP]Souto, Sebastião Nilce [UNESP]de Moraes, Mário Luis Teixeira [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:32:40Z2018-12-11T17:32:40Z2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.002816Floresta e Ambiente, v. 24.2179-80871415-0980http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17890810.1590/2179-8087.002816S2179-808720170001001362-s2.0-85019919402S2179-80872017000100136.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFloresta e Ambiente0,3000,300info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-05T18:13:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/178908Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T19:28:38.939098Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
title Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
spellingShingle Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
Giácomo, Rômulo Guimarães [UNESP]
Eucalyptus urograndis
Mabea fistulifera
Nutrient cycling
title_short Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
title_full Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
title_fullStr Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
title_full_unstemmed Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
title_sort Litterfall and nutrient input in a degraded area
author Giácomo, Rômulo Guimarães [UNESP]
author_facet Giácomo, Rômulo Guimarães [UNESP]
Alves, Marlene Cristina [UNESP]
Camara, Rodrigo
Pereira, Marcos Gervasio
de Arruda, Otton Garcia [UNESP]
Souto, Sebastião Nilce [UNESP]
de Moraes, Mário Luis Teixeira [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Alves, Marlene Cristina [UNESP]
Camara, Rodrigo
Pereira, Marcos Gervasio
de Arruda, Otton Garcia [UNESP]
Souto, Sebastião Nilce [UNESP]
de Moraes, Mário Luis Teixeira [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro - UFRRJ
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Giácomo, Rômulo Guimarães [UNESP]
Alves, Marlene Cristina [UNESP]
Camara, Rodrigo
Pereira, Marcos Gervasio
de Arruda, Otton Garcia [UNESP]
Souto, Sebastião Nilce [UNESP]
de Moraes, Mário Luis Teixeira [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eucalyptus urograndis
Mabea fistulifera
Nutrient cycling
topic Eucalyptus urograndis
Mabea fistulifera
Nutrient cycling
description This study aimed to test the effects of fertilization with organic compost from industrial production of pulp on the litterfall and nutrient input of monospecific plantations in a loan area. The treatments consisted of three doses of the organic compost D10, D15 and D20 (10, 15 and 20 Mg ha-1, respectively), mineral conventional fertilization (DAM) and no fertilization (D0) in land plots (N = 4/treatment/species; 15 x 12 m). Litterfall was monthly collected by two traps (0.72 m2/plot) and sorted out into leaves, twigs, seeds, flowers, fruits and others. We determined the input of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. There were no differences among the treatments and between species in terms of total annual litterfall. The higher nutrient input was obtained by DAM, followed by D10, in both plantations. The annual nutrient input was higher for the litterfall on the E. urograndis plantation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
2018-12-11T17:32:40Z
2018-12-11T17:32:40Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.002816
Floresta e Ambiente, v. 24.
2179-8087
1415-0980
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178908
10.1590/2179-8087.002816
S2179-80872017000100136
2-s2.0-85019919402
S2179-80872017000100136.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.002816
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/178908
identifier_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente, v. 24.
2179-8087
1415-0980
10.1590/2179-8087.002816
S2179-80872017000100136
2-s2.0-85019919402
S2179-80872017000100136.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente
0,300
0,300
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129073676812288