Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Saad, André Luiz Merthan [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lima, Fernanda Silva, De Andrade, Meire Cristina Nogueira [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198157
Resumo: The use of organic fertilizer with two types of grass, coast-cross (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers) and lucerne/alfafa grass (Medicago sativa L.), was analyzed and compared to traditional substrate enriched with wheat bran. Two strains of Ganoderma lucidum, 144 and 351, were used to identify the best option for the substrate. Evaluation criteria comprised the chemical composition of the substrates, biological efficiency and the amount of fresh basidioms and the number of basidioms. Four substrates were tested, namely, S-1 (alfafa + bran), S-2 (alfafa + organic fertilizer), S-3 (coast-cross + bran), S-4 (coast-cross + organic fertilizer), with the two G. lucidum strains. Experiment comprised ten replications, with 80 packages with 700 g of substrate each. Treatments also received 80% grass, 18% wheat bran or organic fertilizer and 2% limestone, with 60% humidity. Best means for EB, MBF and NB showed that S2 (alfafa + fertilizer) and S4 (coast-cross + fertilizer) were the substrates with the best agronomic results. Strain 144 of G. lucidum had the best result and yield in productivity.
id UNSP_d6b27859076d691344cd53bc4baaa011
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198157
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidumADUBO ORGÂNICO CONSORCIADO COM GRAMÍNEAS PARA O CULTIVO DO COGUMELO Ganoderma lucidumGrassMushroomsSubstratesThe use of organic fertilizer with two types of grass, coast-cross (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers) and lucerne/alfafa grass (Medicago sativa L.), was analyzed and compared to traditional substrate enriched with wheat bran. Two strains of Ganoderma lucidum, 144 and 351, were used to identify the best option for the substrate. Evaluation criteria comprised the chemical composition of the substrates, biological efficiency and the amount of fresh basidioms and the number of basidioms. Four substrates were tested, namely, S-1 (alfafa + bran), S-2 (alfafa + organic fertilizer), S-3 (coast-cross + bran), S-4 (coast-cross + organic fertilizer), with the two G. lucidum strains. Experiment comprised ten replications, with 80 packages with 700 g of substrate each. Treatments also received 80% grass, 18% wheat bran or organic fertilizer and 2% limestone, with 60% humidity. Best means for EB, MBF and NB showed that S2 (alfafa + fertilizer) and S4 (coast-cross + fertilizer) were the substrates with the best agronomic results. Strain 144 of G. lucidum had the best result and yield in productivity.Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas de Botucatu - FCA Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia (Energia Na Agricultura) UNESPUniversidade Do Sagrado Coração - USCFaculdade de Ciências Agronômicas de Botucatu - FCA Programa de Pós-graduação em Agronomia (Energia Na Agricultura) UNESPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Do Sagrado Coração - USCSaad, André Luiz Merthan [UNESP]Lima, Fernanda SilvaDe Andrade, Meire Cristina Nogueira [UNESP]2020-12-12T01:00:43Z2020-12-12T01:00:43Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article561-572http://dx.doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-572Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente, v. 11, n. 2, p. 561-572, 2018.2176-91681981-9951http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19815710.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-5722-s2.0-85075179648Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambienteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T09:20:09Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/198157Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T09:20:09Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
ADUBO ORGÂNICO CONSORCIADO COM GRAMÍNEAS PARA O CULTIVO DO COGUMELO Ganoderma lucidum
title Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
spellingShingle Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
Saad, André Luiz Merthan [UNESP]
Grass
Mushrooms
Substrates
title_short Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
title_full Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
title_fullStr Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
title_full_unstemmed Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
title_sort Consorced organic fertilizer with grasses for growing mushroom ganoderma lucidum
author Saad, André Luiz Merthan [UNESP]
author_facet Saad, André Luiz Merthan [UNESP]
Lima, Fernanda Silva
De Andrade, Meire Cristina Nogueira [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lima, Fernanda Silva
De Andrade, Meire Cristina Nogueira [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Do Sagrado Coração - USC
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Saad, André Luiz Merthan [UNESP]
Lima, Fernanda Silva
De Andrade, Meire Cristina Nogueira [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Grass
Mushrooms
Substrates
topic Grass
Mushrooms
Substrates
description The use of organic fertilizer with two types of grass, coast-cross (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers) and lucerne/alfafa grass (Medicago sativa L.), was analyzed and compared to traditional substrate enriched with wheat bran. Two strains of Ganoderma lucidum, 144 and 351, were used to identify the best option for the substrate. Evaluation criteria comprised the chemical composition of the substrates, biological efficiency and the amount of fresh basidioms and the number of basidioms. Four substrates were tested, namely, S-1 (alfafa + bran), S-2 (alfafa + organic fertilizer), S-3 (coast-cross + bran), S-4 (coast-cross + organic fertilizer), with the two G. lucidum strains. Experiment comprised ten replications, with 80 packages with 700 g of substrate each. Treatments also received 80% grass, 18% wheat bran or organic fertilizer and 2% limestone, with 60% humidity. Best means for EB, MBF and NB showed that S2 (alfafa + fertilizer) and S4 (coast-cross + fertilizer) were the substrates with the best agronomic results. Strain 144 of G. lucidum had the best result and yield in productivity.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
2020-12-12T01:00:43Z
2020-12-12T01:00:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-572
Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente, v. 11, n. 2, p. 561-572, 2018.
2176-9168
1981-9951
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198157
10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-572
2-s2.0-85075179648
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/198157
identifier_str_mv Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente, v. 11, n. 2, p. 561-572, 2018.
2176-9168
1981-9951
10.17765/2176-9168.2018v11n2p561-572
2-s2.0-85075179648
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 561-572
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046442696179712