Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227080 |
Resumo: | Purpose: This in vitro study evaluated the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques (tapered and splinted) with two stock trays (plastic and metal) for implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: A master cast with four parallel abutment analogs and a passive framework were fabricated. Polyvinyl siloxane impression material was used for all impressions with two metal stock trays and two plastic stock trays (closed and open trays). Four groups (tapered plastic, splinted plastic, tapered metal, and splinted metal) and a control group (master cast) were tested (n = 5 for each group). After the framework was seated on each of the casts, one abutment screw was tightened, and the marginal gap between the abutment and framework on the other side was measured with a stereomicroscope. The measurements were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks test followed by the Dunn method. Results: The mean values (± standard deviations) for the abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast, 32 ± 2 µm; tapered metal, 44 ± 10 µm; splinted metal, 69 ± 28 µm; tapered plastic, 164 ± 58 µm; splinted plastic, 128 ± 47 µm. No significant difference was detected between the master cast, tapered metal, and splinted metal groups or between the tapered and splinted plastic groups. Conclusions: In this study, the rigidity of the metal stock tray ensured better results than the plastic stock tray for implant impressions with a high-viscosity impression material (putty). Statistically similar results were obtained using tapered impression copings and splinted squared impression copings. The tapered impression copings technique and splinted squared impression copings technique with a metal stock tray produced precise casts with no statistically significant difference in interface gaps compared to the master cast. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. |
id |
UNSP_dca5bcd18b2c11d8013b82a0d3bad8d2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227080 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressionsClosed trayImplant impression accuracyOpen traySplinted squared impression copingStock trayTapered impression copingPurpose: This in vitro study evaluated the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques (tapered and splinted) with two stock trays (plastic and metal) for implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: A master cast with four parallel abutment analogs and a passive framework were fabricated. Polyvinyl siloxane impression material was used for all impressions with two metal stock trays and two plastic stock trays (closed and open trays). Four groups (tapered plastic, splinted plastic, tapered metal, and splinted metal) and a control group (master cast) were tested (n = 5 for each group). After the framework was seated on each of the casts, one abutment screw was tightened, and the marginal gap between the abutment and framework on the other side was measured with a stereomicroscope. The measurements were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks test followed by the Dunn method. Results: The mean values (± standard deviations) for the abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast, 32 ± 2 µm; tapered metal, 44 ± 10 µm; splinted metal, 69 ± 28 µm; tapered plastic, 164 ± 58 µm; splinted plastic, 128 ± 47 µm. No significant difference was detected between the master cast, tapered metal, and splinted metal groups or between the tapered and splinted plastic groups. Conclusions: In this study, the rigidity of the metal stock tray ensured better results than the plastic stock tray for implant impressions with a high-viscosity impression material (putty). Statistically similar results were obtained using tapered impression copings and splinted squared impression copings. The tapered impression copings technique and splinted squared impression copings technique with a metal stock tray produced precise casts with no statistically significant difference in interface gaps compared to the master cast. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.Araraquara University Center Centro Universitário de Araraquara, Araraquara, São PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São PauloAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São PauloAraraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São PauloCentro Universitário de AraraquaraUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Del’Acqua, Marcelo AntonialliDe Avila, Érica Dorigatti [UNESP]Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP]Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira [UNESP]Mollo, Francisco De Assis [UNESP]2022-04-29T06:37:17Z2022-04-29T06:37:17Z2012-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article544-550International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 27, n. 3, p. 544-550, 2012.0882-2786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2270802-s2.0-84871678927Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:56:40Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/227080Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:56:40Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
title |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli Closed tray Implant impression accuracy Open tray Splinted squared impression coping Stock tray Tapered impression coping |
title_short |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
title_full |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
title_sort |
Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions |
author |
Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli |
author_facet |
Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli De Avila, Érica Dorigatti [UNESP] Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP] Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira [UNESP] Mollo, Francisco De Assis [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
De Avila, Érica Dorigatti [UNESP] Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP] Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira [UNESP] Mollo, Francisco De Assis [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário de Araraquara Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli De Avila, Érica Dorigatti [UNESP] Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP] Pinelli, Lígia Antunes Pereira [UNESP] Mollo, Francisco De Assis [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Closed tray Implant impression accuracy Open tray Splinted squared impression coping Stock tray Tapered impression coping |
topic |
Closed tray Implant impression accuracy Open tray Splinted squared impression coping Stock tray Tapered impression coping |
description |
Purpose: This in vitro study evaluated the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques (tapered and splinted) with two stock trays (plastic and metal) for implant-supported prostheses. Materials and Methods: A master cast with four parallel abutment analogs and a passive framework were fabricated. Polyvinyl siloxane impression material was used for all impressions with two metal stock trays and two plastic stock trays (closed and open trays). Four groups (tapered plastic, splinted plastic, tapered metal, and splinted metal) and a control group (master cast) were tested (n = 5 for each group). After the framework was seated on each of the casts, one abutment screw was tightened, and the marginal gap between the abutment and framework on the other side was measured with a stereomicroscope. The measurements were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks test followed by the Dunn method. Results: The mean values (± standard deviations) for the abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast, 32 ± 2 µm; tapered metal, 44 ± 10 µm; splinted metal, 69 ± 28 µm; tapered plastic, 164 ± 58 µm; splinted plastic, 128 ± 47 µm. No significant difference was detected between the master cast, tapered metal, and splinted metal groups or between the tapered and splinted plastic groups. Conclusions: In this study, the rigidity of the metal stock tray ensured better results than the plastic stock tray for implant impressions with a high-viscosity impression material (putty). Statistically similar results were obtained using tapered impression copings and splinted squared impression copings. The tapered impression copings technique and splinted squared impression copings technique with a metal stock tray produced precise casts with no statistically significant difference in interface gaps compared to the master cast. © 2012 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-01-01 2022-04-29T06:37:17Z 2022-04-29T06:37:17Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 27, n. 3, p. 544-550, 2012. 0882-2786 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227080 2-s2.0-84871678927 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 27, n. 3, p. 544-550, 2012. 0882-2786 2-s2.0-84871678927 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/227080 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
544-550 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546405373935616 |