Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/226095 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To investigate, in vitro, the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques (squared impression copings and squared impression copings sandblasted and coated with impression adhesive) made of vinyl polysiloxane and polyether impression materials. Materials and Methods: A master cast (control group) with four parallel implant abutment analogs, a passive framework, and a custom aluminum tray was fabricated. Four groups (n = 5 each group) were tested: squared Impregum (SI), squared Express (SE), sandblasted adhesive squared Impregum (ASI), and sandblasted adhesive squared Express (ASE). The measurement method employed was just one titanium screw tightened to the framework. A stereomicroscope was used to evaluate the fit of the framework by measuring the size of the gap between the abutment and the framework. The results were analyzed statistically. Results: The mean values for the abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast, 31.63 µm (SD 2.16); SI, 38.03 µm (SD 9.29); ASI, 46.80 µm (SD 8.47); SE, 151.21 µm (SD 22.79); and ASE, 136.59 µm (SD 29.80). No significant difference was detected between the SI or ASI techniques and the master cast. No significant difference was detected between the SE and ASE techniques. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Impregum Soft medium consistency was the best impression material and the impression technique did not influence the accuracy of the stone casts. © 2010 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. |
id |
UNSP_b5614cf6947757d2f9b06aa79e68f022 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/226095 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesisDental implantImplant impression techniqueImpression materialPurpose: To investigate, in vitro, the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques (squared impression copings and squared impression copings sandblasted and coated with impression adhesive) made of vinyl polysiloxane and polyether impression materials. Materials and Methods: A master cast (control group) with four parallel implant abutment analogs, a passive framework, and a custom aluminum tray was fabricated. Four groups (n = 5 each group) were tested: squared Impregum (SI), squared Express (SE), sandblasted adhesive squared Impregum (ASI), and sandblasted adhesive squared Express (ASE). The measurement method employed was just one titanium screw tightened to the framework. A stereomicroscope was used to evaluate the fit of the framework by measuring the size of the gap between the abutment and the framework. The results were analyzed statistically. Results: The mean values for the abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast, 31.63 µm (SD 2.16); SI, 38.03 µm (SD 9.29); ASI, 46.80 µm (SD 8.47); SE, 151.21 µm (SD 22.79); and ASE, 136.59 µm (SD 29.80). No significant difference was detected between the SI or ASI techniques and the master cast. No significant difference was detected between the SE and ASE techniques. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Impregum Soft medium consistency was the best impression material and the impression technique did not influence the accuracy of the stone casts. © 2010 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.Araraquara University Center UNIARA, Araraquara, São PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São PauloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São PauloUNIARAUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Del’Acqua, Marcelo AntonialliChávez, Alejandro Muñoz [UNESP]Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP]Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP]De Assis Mollo, Francisco [UNESP]2022-04-28T21:25:15Z2022-04-28T21:25:15Z2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article771-776International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 25, n. 4, p. 771-776, 2010.0882-2786http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2260952-s2.0-78049429474Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-27T14:57:25Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/226095Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-27T14:57:25Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
title |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli Dental implant Implant impression technique Impression material |
title_short |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
title_full |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
title_sort |
Comparison of impression techniques and materials for an implant-supported prosthesis |
author |
Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli |
author_facet |
Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli Chávez, Alejandro Muñoz [UNESP] Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP] Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP] De Assis Mollo, Francisco [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chávez, Alejandro Muñoz [UNESP] Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP] Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP] De Assis Mollo, Francisco [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
UNIARA Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Del’Acqua, Marcelo Antonialli Chávez, Alejandro Muñoz [UNESP] Amaral, Ângela Líbia Chagas [UNESP] Compagnoni, Marco Antonio [UNESP] De Assis Mollo, Francisco [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implant Implant impression technique Impression material |
topic |
Dental implant Implant impression technique Impression material |
description |
Purpose: To investigate, in vitro, the dimensional accuracy of two impression techniques (squared impression copings and squared impression copings sandblasted and coated with impression adhesive) made of vinyl polysiloxane and polyether impression materials. Materials and Methods: A master cast (control group) with four parallel implant abutment analogs, a passive framework, and a custom aluminum tray was fabricated. Four groups (n = 5 each group) were tested: squared Impregum (SI), squared Express (SE), sandblasted adhesive squared Impregum (ASI), and sandblasted adhesive squared Express (ASE). The measurement method employed was just one titanium screw tightened to the framework. A stereomicroscope was used to evaluate the fit of the framework by measuring the size of the gap between the abutment and the framework. The results were analyzed statistically. Results: The mean values for the abutment/framework interface gaps were: master cast, 31.63 µm (SD 2.16); SI, 38.03 µm (SD 9.29); ASI, 46.80 µm (SD 8.47); SE, 151.21 µm (SD 22.79); and ASE, 136.59 µm (SD 29.80). No significant difference was detected between the SI or ASI techniques and the master cast. No significant difference was detected between the SE and ASE techniques. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that Impregum Soft medium consistency was the best impression material and the impression technique did not influence the accuracy of the stone casts. © 2010 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01-01 2022-04-28T21:25:15Z 2022-04-28T21:25:15Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 25, n. 4, p. 771-776, 2010. 0882-2786 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/226095 2-s2.0-78049429474 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 25, n. 4, p. 771-776, 2010. 0882-2786 2-s2.0-78049429474 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/226095 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
771-776 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546500870897664 |