Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Pinto, Léia Quintanilha [UNESP], Leonel, André Gilberto [UNESP], Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP], Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=24152&print=y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69775
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare the bond strength to enamel between resin cements combined with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems and a self-adhesive cement. Eighty bovine incisors had their buccal surface ground flat exposing a plane area in the enamel. Eighty Artglass resin cylinders measuring 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were fabricated. The teeth were divided into eight groups of 10 teeth each and the resin cylinders were cemented with different adhesive systems and resin cements; G1: RelyX Unicem (self-adhesive cement); G2: H 3PO 4 + Single Bond + RelyX ARC; G3: AdheSE + Variolink II; G4: H 3PO 4 + Excite + Variolink II; G5: Xeno III + Enforce; G6: H 3PO 4 + Prime&Bond NT + Enforce; G7: Biatite Primers 1 and 2 + Bistite II DC; G8: H 3PO 4 + Bistite Primers 1 and 2 + Bistite II DC. After application of the adhesives, the cylinders were cemented according to manufacturer instructions. The specimens were submitted to 2000 thermal cycles at a temperature ranging from 5±5°C to 55±5°C, and shear bond strength was then tested at a variety of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey's test (á=5%), obtaining a p value of 0.00. The following mean (±standard deviation) bond strength values were observed for each group: G1: 5.14(±0.99)a; G3: 16.23(±4.69)b; G7: 17.82(±3.66)b; G5: 18.48(±2.88)bc; G8: 20.15(±4.12)bc; G4: 22.85(±3.08)cd; G2: 24.96(±2.89)d; G6: 26.07(±1.69)d. Groups followed by the same letters did not differ significantly. For most of the resin cements tested, the application of adhesive systems using acid etching resulted in a higher bond strength when compared to the self-etch adhesive systems and to the self-adhesive cement.
id UNSP_ddcc66201bb63d38f9bd1d99a7f47765
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69775
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cementsCementationDental enamelShear strengthThe aim of this study was to compare the bond strength to enamel between resin cements combined with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems and a self-adhesive cement. Eighty bovine incisors had their buccal surface ground flat exposing a plane area in the enamel. Eighty Artglass resin cylinders measuring 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were fabricated. The teeth were divided into eight groups of 10 teeth each and the resin cylinders were cemented with different adhesive systems and resin cements; G1: RelyX Unicem (self-adhesive cement); G2: H 3PO 4 + Single Bond + RelyX ARC; G3: AdheSE + Variolink II; G4: H 3PO 4 + Excite + Variolink II; G5: Xeno III + Enforce; G6: H 3PO 4 + Prime&Bond NT + Enforce; G7: Biatite Primers 1 and 2 + Bistite II DC; G8: H 3PO 4 + Bistite Primers 1 and 2 + Bistite II DC. After application of the adhesives, the cylinders were cemented according to manufacturer instructions. The specimens were submitted to 2000 thermal cycles at a temperature ranging from 5±5°C to 55±5°C, and shear bond strength was then tested at a variety of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey's test (á=5%), obtaining a p value of 0.00. The following mean (±standard deviation) bond strength values were observed for each group: G1: 5.14(±0.99)a; G3: 16.23(±4.69)b; G7: 17.82(±3.66)b; G5: 18.48(±2.88)bc; G8: 20.15(±4.12)bc; G4: 22.85(±3.08)cd; G2: 24.96(±2.89)d; G6: 26.07(±1.69)d. Groups followed by the same letters did not differ significantly. For most of the resin cements tested, the application of adhesive systems using acid etching resulted in a higher bond strength when compared to the self-etch adhesive systems and to the self-adhesive cement.Department of Restorative Dentistry São José Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, Av. Engenheiro F. J. Longo 777, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP 12245-000Academic Clinical Research Group (GAPEC) São José do Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SPDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São José Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, Av. Engenheiro F. J. Longo 777, Sao Jose dos Campos, SP 12245-000Academic Clinical Research Group (GAPEC) São José do Campos School of Dentistry São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]Pinto, Léia Quintanilha [UNESP]Leonel, André Gilberto [UNESP]Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:22:32Z2014-05-27T11:22:32Z2007-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1376-1382application/pdfhttp://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=24152&print=yBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 6, n. 22, p. 1376-1382, 2007.1677-32171677-3225http://hdl.handle.net/11449/697752-s2.0-372490897532-s2.0-37249089753.pdf3135367849609938696047005303790517540206528748500000-0003-4830-0400Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-10T06:09:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69775Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:17:40.227553Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
title Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
spellingShingle Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
Cementation
Dental enamel
Shear strength
title_short Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
title_full Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
title_fullStr Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
title_full_unstemmed Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
title_sort Interaction between total-etch and self-etch adhesives and conventional and self-adhesive resin cements
author Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
author_facet Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
Pinto, Léia Quintanilha [UNESP]
Leonel, André Gilberto [UNESP]
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Pinto, Léia Quintanilha [UNESP]
Leonel, André Gilberto [UNESP]
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes [UNESP]
Pinto, Léia Quintanilha [UNESP]
Leonel, André Gilberto [UNESP]
Pucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra Bühler [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cementation
Dental enamel
Shear strength
topic Cementation
Dental enamel
Shear strength
description The aim of this study was to compare the bond strength to enamel between resin cements combined with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems and a self-adhesive cement. Eighty bovine incisors had their buccal surface ground flat exposing a plane area in the enamel. Eighty Artglass resin cylinders measuring 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in height were fabricated. The teeth were divided into eight groups of 10 teeth each and the resin cylinders were cemented with different adhesive systems and resin cements; G1: RelyX Unicem (self-adhesive cement); G2: H 3PO 4 + Single Bond + RelyX ARC; G3: AdheSE + Variolink II; G4: H 3PO 4 + Excite + Variolink II; G5: Xeno III + Enforce; G6: H 3PO 4 + Prime&Bond NT + Enforce; G7: Biatite Primers 1 and 2 + Bistite II DC; G8: H 3PO 4 + Bistite Primers 1 and 2 + Bistite II DC. After application of the adhesives, the cylinders were cemented according to manufacturer instructions. The specimens were submitted to 2000 thermal cycles at a temperature ranging from 5±5°C to 55±5°C, and shear bond strength was then tested at a variety of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and the Tukey's test (á=5%), obtaining a p value of 0.00. The following mean (±standard deviation) bond strength values were observed for each group: G1: 5.14(±0.99)a; G3: 16.23(±4.69)b; G7: 17.82(±3.66)b; G5: 18.48(±2.88)bc; G8: 20.15(±4.12)bc; G4: 22.85(±3.08)cd; G2: 24.96(±2.89)d; G6: 26.07(±1.69)d. Groups followed by the same letters did not differ significantly. For most of the resin cements tested, the application of adhesive systems using acid etching resulted in a higher bond strength when compared to the self-etch adhesive systems and to the self-adhesive cement.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-07-01
2014-05-27T11:22:32Z
2014-05-27T11:22:32Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=24152&print=y
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 6, n. 22, p. 1376-1382, 2007.
1677-3217
1677-3225
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69775
2-s2.0-37249089753
2-s2.0-37249089753.pdf
3135367849609938
6960470053037905
1754020652874850
0000-0003-4830-0400
url http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=24152&print=y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69775
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 6, n. 22, p. 1376-1382, 2007.
1677-3217
1677-3225
2-s2.0-37249089753
2-s2.0-37249089753.pdf
3135367849609938
6960470053037905
1754020652874850
0000-0003-4830-0400
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
0,131
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1376-1382
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128786024103936