Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-2536 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222138 |
Resumo: | This paper intends to present an analysis of two uses of adversative conjunction pero found in a Spanish written corpus in digital media. The theoretical-methodological apparatus used is the Functional Discourse Grammar – FDG (HENGEVELD; MACKENZIE, 2008). According to RAE (2009), pero is coordinative conjunction in which presents two opposing clauses. From the point of view of FDG, however, these two units configure Discourse Acts in an unequal relationship, which engender Concession rhetorical function. The speaker presents an Act to grant information in order to then present another Act that he considers arguably more relevant. Some of the uses found in this study are beyond that interpretation. The research universe consists of data collected from blogs and extracted from CORPES (Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI), from the Real Academia Española. It was verified that, besides being used between two Discourse Acts, it can also introduce Moves and also emphasize a Subact previously presented, being a valuable element for the speaker’s argument. |
id |
UNSP_e179492606159c9c5947ec5da8f15711 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222138 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital mediaUsos argumentativos de “pero” em meios digitais espanhóisArgumentationPeroRhetoricSpanishThis paper intends to present an analysis of two uses of adversative conjunction pero found in a Spanish written corpus in digital media. The theoretical-methodological apparatus used is the Functional Discourse Grammar – FDG (HENGEVELD; MACKENZIE, 2008). According to RAE (2009), pero is coordinative conjunction in which presents two opposing clauses. From the point of view of FDG, however, these two units configure Discourse Acts in an unequal relationship, which engender Concession rhetorical function. The speaker presents an Act to grant information in order to then present another Act that he considers arguably more relevant. Some of the uses found in this study are beyond that interpretation. The research universe consists of data collected from blogs and extracted from CORPES (Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI), from the Real Academia Española. It was verified that, besides being used between two Discourse Acts, it can also introduce Moves and also emphasize a Subact previously presented, being a valuable element for the speaker’s argument.Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pedro, Carolina da Costa [UNESP]Garcia, Talita Storti [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:42:39Z2022-04-28T19:42:39Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2509-2536http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-2536Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 29, n. 4, p. 2509-2536, 2021.2237-20830104-0588http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22213810.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-25362-s2.0-85111979324Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporRevista de Estudos da Linguageminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:42:39Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222138Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:19:23.956891Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media Usos argumentativos de “pero” em meios digitais espanhóis |
title |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media |
spellingShingle |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media Pedro, Carolina da Costa [UNESP] Argumentation Pero Rhetoric Spanish |
title_short |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media |
title_full |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media |
title_fullStr |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media |
title_full_unstemmed |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media |
title_sort |
Argumentative uses of “pero” in spanish digital media |
author |
Pedro, Carolina da Costa [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Pedro, Carolina da Costa [UNESP] Garcia, Talita Storti [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garcia, Talita Storti [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pedro, Carolina da Costa [UNESP] Garcia, Talita Storti [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Argumentation Pero Rhetoric Spanish |
topic |
Argumentation Pero Rhetoric Spanish |
description |
This paper intends to present an analysis of two uses of adversative conjunction pero found in a Spanish written corpus in digital media. The theoretical-methodological apparatus used is the Functional Discourse Grammar – FDG (HENGEVELD; MACKENZIE, 2008). According to RAE (2009), pero is coordinative conjunction in which presents two opposing clauses. From the point of view of FDG, however, these two units configure Discourse Acts in an unequal relationship, which engender Concession rhetorical function. The speaker presents an Act to grant information in order to then present another Act that he considers arguably more relevant. Some of the uses found in this study are beyond that interpretation. The research universe consists of data collected from blogs and extracted from CORPES (Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI), from the Real Academia Española. It was verified that, besides being used between two Discourse Acts, it can also introduce Moves and also emphasize a Subact previously presented, being a valuable element for the speaker’s argument. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-28T19:42:39Z 2022-04-28T19:42:39Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-2536 Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 29, n. 4, p. 2509-2536, 2021. 2237-2083 0104-0588 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222138 10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-2536 2-s2.0-85111979324 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-2536 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222138 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 29, n. 4, p. 2509-2536, 2021. 2237-2083 0104-0588 10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2509-2536 2-s2.0-85111979324 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2509-2536 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128919435476992 |