Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Fernando A. O.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A., Moura, Livia C., Schmidt, Isabel B., Andersen, Alan N., Bond, William, Buisson, Elise, Durigan, Giselda, Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP], Oliveira, Rafael S., Parr, Catherine, Rowland, Lucy, Veldman, Joseph W., Pennington, R. Toby
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222721
Resumo: We introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)—defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy—and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises.
id UNSP_ea7363939252ca9c3f7d36c6e186336a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222721
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restorationafforestationdecolonisationopen ecosystemspublic perceptionreforestationresearch biassavannastree plantingWe introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)—defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy—and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises.Department of Genetics Ecology and Evolution Federal University of Minas GeraisInstitute Society Population and NatureDepartment of Ecology University of BrasíliaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin UniversityDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape TownInstitut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie CNRS IRD Aix Marseille Université Avignon Université IUT d'AvignonInstituto de Pesquisas AmbientaisLab of Vegetation Ecology Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Plant Biology University of CampinasSchool of Environmental Sciences University of LiverpoolDepartment of Zoology & Entomology University of PretoriaSchool of Animal Plant & Environmental Sciences University of the WitwatersrandDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of ExeterDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology Texas A&M UniversityRoyal Botanic Garden EdinburghLab of Vegetation Ecology Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Population and NatureUniversity of BrasíliaCharles Darwin UniversityUniversity of Cape TownIUT d'AvignonInstituto de Pesquisas AmbientaisUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)University of LiverpoolUniversity of PretoriaUniversity of the WitwatersrandUniversity of ExeterTexas A&M UniversityRoyal Botanic Garden EdinburghSilveira, Fernando A. O.Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A.Moura, Livia C.Schmidt, Isabel B.Andersen, Alan N.Bond, WilliamBuisson, EliseDurigan, GiseldaFidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]Oliveira, Rafael S.Parr, CatherineRowland, LucyVeldman, Joseph W.Pennington, R. Toby2022-04-28T19:46:24Z2022-04-28T19:46:24Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060Journal of Applied Ecology.1365-26640021-8901http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22272110.1111/1365-2664.140602-s2.0-85117804508Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Ecologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:46:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222721Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:46:24Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
title Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
spellingShingle Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
Silveira, Fernando A. O.
afforestation
decolonisation
open ecosystems
public perception
reforestation
research bias
savannas
tree planting
title_short Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
title_full Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
title_fullStr Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
title_full_unstemmed Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
title_sort Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
author Silveira, Fernando A. O.
author_facet Silveira, Fernando A. O.
Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A.
Moura, Livia C.
Schmidt, Isabel B.
Andersen, Alan N.
Bond, William
Buisson, Elise
Durigan, Giselda
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Oliveira, Rafael S.
Parr, Catherine
Rowland, Lucy
Veldman, Joseph W.
Pennington, R. Toby
author_role author
author2 Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A.
Moura, Livia C.
Schmidt, Isabel B.
Andersen, Alan N.
Bond, William
Buisson, Elise
Durigan, Giselda
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Oliveira, Rafael S.
Parr, Catherine
Rowland, Lucy
Veldman, Joseph W.
Pennington, R. Toby
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Population and Nature
University of Brasília
Charles Darwin University
University of Cape Town
IUT d'Avignon
Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
University of Liverpool
University of Pretoria
University of the Witwatersrand
University of Exeter
Texas A&M University
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, Fernando A. O.
Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A.
Moura, Livia C.
Schmidt, Isabel B.
Andersen, Alan N.
Bond, William
Buisson, Elise
Durigan, Giselda
Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]
Oliveira, Rafael S.
Parr, Catherine
Rowland, Lucy
Veldman, Joseph W.
Pennington, R. Toby
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv afforestation
decolonisation
open ecosystems
public perception
reforestation
research bias
savannas
tree planting
topic afforestation
decolonisation
open ecosystems
public perception
reforestation
research bias
savannas
tree planting
description We introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)—defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy—and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T19:46:24Z
2022-04-28T19:46:24Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060
Journal of Applied Ecology.
1365-2664
0021-8901
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222721
10.1111/1365-2664.14060
2-s2.0-85117804508
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222721
identifier_str_mv Journal of Applied Ecology.
1365-2664
0021-8901
10.1111/1365-2664.14060
2-s2.0-85117804508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Ecology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965688244207616