Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222721 |
Resumo: | We introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)—defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy—and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises. |
id |
UNSP_ea7363939252ca9c3f7d36c6e186336a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222721 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restorationafforestationdecolonisationopen ecosystemspublic perceptionreforestationresearch biassavannastree plantingWe introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)—defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy—and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises.Department of Genetics Ecology and Evolution Federal University of Minas GeraisInstitute Society Population and NatureDepartment of Ecology University of BrasíliaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods Charles Darwin UniversityDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape TownInstitut Méditerranéen de Biodiversité et d'Ecologie CNRS IRD Aix Marseille Université Avignon Université IUT d'AvignonInstituto de Pesquisas AmbientaisLab of Vegetation Ecology Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Department of Plant Biology University of CampinasSchool of Environmental Sciences University of LiverpoolDepartment of Zoology & Entomology University of PretoriaSchool of Animal Plant & Environmental Sciences University of the WitwatersrandDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of ExeterDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology Texas A&M UniversityRoyal Botanic Garden EdinburghLab of Vegetation Ecology Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Population and NatureUniversity of BrasíliaCharles Darwin UniversityUniversity of Cape TownIUT d'AvignonInstituto de Pesquisas AmbientaisUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)University of LiverpoolUniversity of PretoriaUniversity of the WitwatersrandUniversity of ExeterTexas A&M UniversityRoyal Botanic Garden EdinburghSilveira, Fernando A. O.Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A.Moura, Livia C.Schmidt, Isabel B.Andersen, Alan N.Bond, WilliamBuisson, EliseDurigan, GiseldaFidelis, Alessandra [UNESP]Oliveira, Rafael S.Parr, CatherineRowland, LucyVeldman, Joseph W.Pennington, R. Toby2022-04-28T19:46:24Z2022-04-28T19:46:24Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060Journal of Applied Ecology.1365-26640021-8901http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22272110.1111/1365-2664.140602-s2.0-85117804508Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Applied Ecologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:46:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222721Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:37:06.367295Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
title |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
spellingShingle |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration Silveira, Fernando A. O. afforestation decolonisation open ecosystems public perception reforestation research bias savannas tree planting |
title_short |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
title_full |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
title_fullStr |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
title_sort |
Biome Awareness Disparity is BAD for tropical ecosystem conservation and restoration |
author |
Silveira, Fernando A. O. |
author_facet |
Silveira, Fernando A. O. Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A. Moura, Livia C. Schmidt, Isabel B. Andersen, Alan N. Bond, William Buisson, Elise Durigan, Giselda Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP] Oliveira, Rafael S. Parr, Catherine Rowland, Lucy Veldman, Joseph W. Pennington, R. Toby |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A. Moura, Livia C. Schmidt, Isabel B. Andersen, Alan N. Bond, William Buisson, Elise Durigan, Giselda Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP] Oliveira, Rafael S. Parr, Catherine Rowland, Lucy Veldman, Joseph W. Pennington, R. Toby |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Population and Nature University of Brasília Charles Darwin University University of Cape Town IUT d'Avignon Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) University of Liverpool University of Pretoria University of the Witwatersrand University of Exeter Texas A&M University Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Fernando A. O. Ordóñez-Parra, Carlos A. Moura, Livia C. Schmidt, Isabel B. Andersen, Alan N. Bond, William Buisson, Elise Durigan, Giselda Fidelis, Alessandra [UNESP] Oliveira, Rafael S. Parr, Catherine Rowland, Lucy Veldman, Joseph W. Pennington, R. Toby |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
afforestation decolonisation open ecosystems public perception reforestation research bias savannas tree planting |
topic |
afforestation decolonisation open ecosystems public perception reforestation research bias savannas tree planting |
description |
We introduce the concept of Biome Awareness Disparity (BAD)—defined as a failure to appreciate the significance of all biomes in conservation and restoration policy—and quantify disparities in (a) attention and interest, (b) action and (c) knowledge among biomes in tropical restoration science, practice and policy. By analysing 50,000 tweets from all Partner Institutions of the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration, and 45,000 tweets from the main science and environmental news media world-wide, we found strong disparities in attention and interest relative to biome extent and diversity. Tweets largely focused on forests, whereas open biomes (such as grasslands, savannas and shrublands) received less attention in relation to their area. In contrast to these differences in attention, there were equivalent likes and retweets between forest versus open biomes, suggesting the disparities may not reflect the views of the general public. Through a literature review, we found that restoration experiments are disproportionately concentrated in rainforests, dry forests and mangroves. More than half of the studies conducted in open biomes reported tree planting as the main restoration action, suggesting inappropriate application of forest-oriented techniques. Policy implications. We urge scientists, policymakers and land managers to recognise the value of open biomes for protecting biodiversity, securing ecosystem services, mitigating climate change and enhancing human livelihoods. Fixing Biome Awareness Disparity will increase the likelihood of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration successfully delivering its promises. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 2022-04-28T19:46:24Z 2022-04-28T19:46:24Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060 Journal of Applied Ecology. 1365-2664 0021-8901 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222721 10.1111/1365-2664.14060 2-s2.0-85117804508 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14060 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222721 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Ecology. 1365-2664 0021-8901 10.1111/1365-2664.14060 2-s2.0-85117804508 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Ecology |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129536919863296 |