Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972778 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201779 |
Resumo: | The real-time monitoring of manufacturing processes is essential to achieve high-quality standards and uniformity at reduced costs. The monitoring of machining processes is usually performed by acoustic emission sensors, which measure the dynamic waves of mechanical stress that propagate through the material during the grinding process. This work studies the application of knock sensors, commonly used in the monitoring of combustion engines, as a low-cost and high-robustness alternative to acoustic emission sensors in the monitoring of the grinding process. Built to operate mechanically attached to the engine block, the knock sensor is resistant to high temperatures, liquids, and particles. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of the sensor, different tests were performed. By determining its resonant frequency, it was possible to identify the response curve of the sensor and its optimal operating range. The acoustic impulse test, generated by the pencil lead break technique, allowed the comparative analysis of the spectral performance between the acoustic emission sensor and the knock sensor. The performance of the knock sensor in an industrial environment was also verified in a case study. The results showed a similar spectral behavior between both sensors when subjected to the same stimulus, demonstrating the feasibility of using the knock sensor to monitor the grinding process. |
id |
UNSP_eaa05c1765c5c8dc466846929c6a734f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201779 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission SensorsAcoustic emissiongrindingknock sensorprocess monitoringThe real-time monitoring of manufacturing processes is essential to achieve high-quality standards and uniformity at reduced costs. The monitoring of machining processes is usually performed by acoustic emission sensors, which measure the dynamic waves of mechanical stress that propagate through the material during the grinding process. This work studies the application of knock sensors, commonly used in the monitoring of combustion engines, as a low-cost and high-robustness alternative to acoustic emission sensors in the monitoring of the grinding process. Built to operate mechanically attached to the engine block, the knock sensor is resistant to high temperatures, liquids, and particles. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of the sensor, different tests were performed. By determining its resonant frequency, it was possible to identify the response curve of the sensor and its optimal operating range. The acoustic impulse test, generated by the pencil lead break technique, allowed the comparative analysis of the spectral performance between the acoustic emission sensor and the knock sensor. The performance of the knock sensor in an industrial environment was also verified in a case study. The results showed a similar spectral behavior between both sensors when subjected to the same stimulus, demonstrating the feasibility of using the knock sensor to monitor the grinding process.School of Engineering University Center of Lins (UNILINS)Electrical Engineering Department School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)Electrical Engineering Department School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)University Center of Lins (UNILINS)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Fernandez, Breno O.Aguiar, Paulo R. [UNESP]Alexandre, Felipe A. [UNESP]Aulestia Viera, Martin A. [UNESP]Bianchi, Eduardo C. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:41:38Z2020-12-12T02:41:38Z2020-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article6038-6045http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972778IEEE Sensors Journal, v. 20, n. 11, p. 6038-6045, 2020.1558-17481530-437Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/20177910.1109/JSEN.2020.29727782-s2.0-85085069329Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengIEEE Sensors Journalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-28T13:55:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201779Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T23:04:15.566549Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
title |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
spellingShingle |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors Fernandez, Breno O. Acoustic emission grinding knock sensor process monitoring |
title_short |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
title_full |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
title_fullStr |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
title_sort |
Study of Knock Sensors as Low-Cost Alternatives to Acoustic Emission Sensors |
author |
Fernandez, Breno O. |
author_facet |
Fernandez, Breno O. Aguiar, Paulo R. [UNESP] Alexandre, Felipe A. [UNESP] Aulestia Viera, Martin A. [UNESP] Bianchi, Eduardo C. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aguiar, Paulo R. [UNESP] Alexandre, Felipe A. [UNESP] Aulestia Viera, Martin A. [UNESP] Bianchi, Eduardo C. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
University Center of Lins (UNILINS) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandez, Breno O. Aguiar, Paulo R. [UNESP] Alexandre, Felipe A. [UNESP] Aulestia Viera, Martin A. [UNESP] Bianchi, Eduardo C. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acoustic emission grinding knock sensor process monitoring |
topic |
Acoustic emission grinding knock sensor process monitoring |
description |
The real-time monitoring of manufacturing processes is essential to achieve high-quality standards and uniformity at reduced costs. The monitoring of machining processes is usually performed by acoustic emission sensors, which measure the dynamic waves of mechanical stress that propagate through the material during the grinding process. This work studies the application of knock sensors, commonly used in the monitoring of combustion engines, as a low-cost and high-robustness alternative to acoustic emission sensors in the monitoring of the grinding process. Built to operate mechanically attached to the engine block, the knock sensor is resistant to high temperatures, liquids, and particles. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of the sensor, different tests were performed. By determining its resonant frequency, it was possible to identify the response curve of the sensor and its optimal operating range. The acoustic impulse test, generated by the pencil lead break technique, allowed the comparative analysis of the spectral performance between the acoustic emission sensor and the knock sensor. The performance of the knock sensor in an industrial environment was also verified in a case study. The results showed a similar spectral behavior between both sensors when subjected to the same stimulus, demonstrating the feasibility of using the knock sensor to monitor the grinding process. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:41:38Z 2020-12-12T02:41:38Z 2020-06-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972778 IEEE Sensors Journal, v. 20, n. 11, p. 6038-6045, 2020. 1558-1748 1530-437X http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201779 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972778 2-s2.0-85085069329 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972778 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201779 |
identifier_str_mv |
IEEE Sensors Journal, v. 20, n. 11, p. 6038-6045, 2020. 1558-1748 1530-437X 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2972778 2-s2.0-85085069329 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
IEEE Sensors Journal |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
6038-6045 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129487887400960 |