Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barretti, Pasqual [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Pereira Doles, Joao Vitor [UNESP], Pinotti, Douglas Goncalves [UNESP], El Dib, Regina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-445
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117311
Resumo: Background: The choice of antimicrobials for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus about the best therapy; few prospective controlled studies have been published, and the only published systematic reviews did not report superiority of any class of antimicrobials. The objective of this review was to analyze the results of PD peritonitis treatment in adult patients by employing a new methodology, the proportional meta-analysis.Methods: A review of the literature was conducted. There was no language restriction. Studies were obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were: (a) case series and RCTs with the number of reported patients in each study greater than five, (b) use of any antibiotic therapy for initial treatment (e.g., cefazolin plus gentamicin or vancomycin plus gentamicin), for Gram-positive (e.g., vancomycin or a first generation cephalosporin), or for Gram-negative rods (e.g., gentamicin, ceftazidime, and fluoroquinolone), (c) patients with PD-related peritonitis, and (d) studies specifying the rates of resolution. A proportional meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using a random-effects model, and the pooled resolution rates were calculated.Results: A total of 64 studies (32 for initial treatment and negative culture, 28 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 24 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods) and 21 RCTs met all inclusion criteria (14 for initial treatment and negative culture, 8 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 8 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods). The pooled resolution rate of ceftazidime plus glycopeptide as initial treatment (pooled proportion = 86% [95% CI 0.82-0.89]) was significantly higher than first generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 66% [95% CI 0.57-0.75]) and significantly higher than glycopeptides plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 75% [95% CI 0.69-0.80]. Other comparisons of regimens used for either initial treatment, treatment for Gram-positive rods or Gram-negative rods did not show statistically significant differences.Conclusion: We showed that the association of a glycopeptide plus ceftazidime is superior to other regimens for initial treatment of PD peritonitis. This result should be carefully analyzed and does not exclude the necessity of monitoring the local microbiologic profile in each dialysis center to choice the initial therapeutic protocol.
id UNSP_ef265bc26663258f9254785874ec8534
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117311
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysisPeritonitisPeritoneal dialysisTreatmentMeta-analysisBackground: The choice of antimicrobials for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus about the best therapy; few prospective controlled studies have been published, and the only published systematic reviews did not report superiority of any class of antimicrobials. The objective of this review was to analyze the results of PD peritonitis treatment in adult patients by employing a new methodology, the proportional meta-analysis.Methods: A review of the literature was conducted. There was no language restriction. Studies were obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were: (a) case series and RCTs with the number of reported patients in each study greater than five, (b) use of any antibiotic therapy for initial treatment (e.g., cefazolin plus gentamicin or vancomycin plus gentamicin), for Gram-positive (e.g., vancomycin or a first generation cephalosporin), or for Gram-negative rods (e.g., gentamicin, ceftazidime, and fluoroquinolone), (c) patients with PD-related peritonitis, and (d) studies specifying the rates of resolution. A proportional meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using a random-effects model, and the pooled resolution rates were calculated.Results: A total of 64 studies (32 for initial treatment and negative culture, 28 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 24 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods) and 21 RCTs met all inclusion criteria (14 for initial treatment and negative culture, 8 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 8 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods). The pooled resolution rate of ceftazidime plus glycopeptide as initial treatment (pooled proportion = 86% [95% CI 0.82-0.89]) was significantly higher than first generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 66% [95% CI 0.57-0.75]) and significantly higher than glycopeptides plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 75% [95% CI 0.69-0.80]. Other comparisons of regimens used for either initial treatment, treatment for Gram-positive rods or Gram-negative rods did not show statistically significant differences.Conclusion: We showed that the association of a glycopeptide plus ceftazidime is superior to other regimens for initial treatment of PD peritonitis. This result should be carefully analyzed and does not exclude the necessity of monitoring the local microbiologic profile in each dialysis center to choice the initial therapeutic protocol.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Sao Paulo, BrazilBiomed Central LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Barretti, Pasqual [UNESP]Pereira Doles, Joao Vitor [UNESP]Pinotti, Douglas Goncalves [UNESP]El Dib, Regina [UNESP]2015-03-18T15:55:48Z2015-03-18T15:55:48Z2014-08-18info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-445Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 11 p., 2014.1471-2334http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11731110.1186/1471-2334-14-445WOS:000341784900001WOS000341784900001.pdf54964119838934790000-0003-4979-4836Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBmc Infectious Diseases2.6201,576info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-13T06:03:22Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/117311Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-13T06:03:22Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
title Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
spellingShingle Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
Barretti, Pasqual [UNESP]
Peritonitis
Peritoneal dialysis
Treatment
Meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
title_sort Efficacy of antibiotic therapy for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a proportional meta-analysis
author Barretti, Pasqual [UNESP]
author_facet Barretti, Pasqual [UNESP]
Pereira Doles, Joao Vitor [UNESP]
Pinotti, Douglas Goncalves [UNESP]
El Dib, Regina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Pereira Doles, Joao Vitor [UNESP]
Pinotti, Douglas Goncalves [UNESP]
El Dib, Regina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barretti, Pasqual [UNESP]
Pereira Doles, Joao Vitor [UNESP]
Pinotti, Douglas Goncalves [UNESP]
El Dib, Regina [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Peritonitis
Peritoneal dialysis
Treatment
Meta-analysis
topic Peritonitis
Peritoneal dialysis
Treatment
Meta-analysis
description Background: The choice of antimicrobials for initial treatment of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis is crucial for a favorable outcome. There is no consensus about the best therapy; few prospective controlled studies have been published, and the only published systematic reviews did not report superiority of any class of antimicrobials. The objective of this review was to analyze the results of PD peritonitis treatment in adult patients by employing a new methodology, the proportional meta-analysis.Methods: A review of the literature was conducted. There was no language restriction. Studies were obtained from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS. The inclusion criteria were: (a) case series and RCTs with the number of reported patients in each study greater than five, (b) use of any antibiotic therapy for initial treatment (e.g., cefazolin plus gentamicin or vancomycin plus gentamicin), for Gram-positive (e.g., vancomycin or a first generation cephalosporin), or for Gram-negative rods (e.g., gentamicin, ceftazidime, and fluoroquinolone), (c) patients with PD-related peritonitis, and (d) studies specifying the rates of resolution. A proportional meta-analysis was performed on outcomes using a random-effects model, and the pooled resolution rates were calculated.Results: A total of 64 studies (32 for initial treatment and negative culture, 28 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 24 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods) and 21 RCTs met all inclusion criteria (14 for initial treatment and negative culture, 8 reporting treatment for Gram-positive rods and 8 reporting treatment for Gram-negative rods). The pooled resolution rate of ceftazidime plus glycopeptide as initial treatment (pooled proportion = 86% [95% CI 0.82-0.89]) was significantly higher than first generation cephalosporin plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 66% [95% CI 0.57-0.75]) and significantly higher than glycopeptides plus aminoglycosides (pooled proportion = 75% [95% CI 0.69-0.80]. Other comparisons of regimens used for either initial treatment, treatment for Gram-positive rods or Gram-negative rods did not show statistically significant differences.Conclusion: We showed that the association of a glycopeptide plus ceftazidime is superior to other regimens for initial treatment of PD peritonitis. This result should be carefully analyzed and does not exclude the necessity of monitoring the local microbiologic profile in each dialysis center to choice the initial therapeutic protocol.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-18
2015-03-18T15:55:48Z
2015-03-18T15:55:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-445
Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 11 p., 2014.
1471-2334
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117311
10.1186/1471-2334-14-445
WOS:000341784900001
WOS000341784900001.pdf
5496411983893479
0000-0003-4979-4836
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-445
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/117311
identifier_str_mv Bmc Infectious Diseases. London: Biomed Central Ltd, v. 14, 11 p., 2014.
1471-2334
10.1186/1471-2334-14-445
WOS:000341784900001
WOS000341784900001.pdf
5496411983893479
0000-0003-4979-4836
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Bmc Infectious Diseases
2.620
1,576
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 11
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964539736817664