Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189191 |
Resumo: | This study aimed at comparing the performance of hydroxylation and direct photolysis for removing diclofenac from water. Several parameters were assessed: degradation kinetics, mineralization degree, lipophilicity (log D)of the identified initial intermediates, acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa), and chronic ecotoxicity predictions (ECOSAR 1.11). Hydroxylation was achieved by TiO2-assisted photodegradation. Direct photolysis experiments were performed in the same reaction system, but with no TiO2 addition. At least initially (up to 10 min), both processes followed a zero order kinetics, but direct photolysis was faster than hydroxylation: k = (1.4 ± 0.038)× 10−1 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.991)and (8.7 ± 0.29)× 10−2 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.996), respectively. No mineralization was observed up to 30 min. During TiO2-assisted photodegradation, only hydroxylated intermediates were detected. Direct photolysis proceeded via carbazoles formation. Only direct photolysis was capable of forming hydrophilic products (log D < 0). Acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa)showed that DCF toxicity was successfully removed and no additional ecotoxicity was produced by the degradation products. Chronic ecotoxicity predictions (fish, daphnids, and algae)showed that direct photolysis would produce less toxic substances. In summary, the results point out that direct photolysis is a better choice for removing diclofenac from water, in comparison to TiO2-induced hydroxylation. |
id |
UNSP_efda6361127a63a6940974ffc1d3c48b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189191 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?AOPDiclofenacEcotoxicityLipophilicityPhotolysisTiO2This study aimed at comparing the performance of hydroxylation and direct photolysis for removing diclofenac from water. Several parameters were assessed: degradation kinetics, mineralization degree, lipophilicity (log D)of the identified initial intermediates, acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa), and chronic ecotoxicity predictions (ECOSAR 1.11). Hydroxylation was achieved by TiO2-assisted photodegradation. Direct photolysis experiments were performed in the same reaction system, but with no TiO2 addition. At least initially (up to 10 min), both processes followed a zero order kinetics, but direct photolysis was faster than hydroxylation: k = (1.4 ± 0.038)× 10−1 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.991)and (8.7 ± 0.29)× 10−2 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.996), respectively. No mineralization was observed up to 30 min. During TiO2-assisted photodegradation, only hydroxylated intermediates were detected. Direct photolysis proceeded via carbazoles formation. Only direct photolysis was capable of forming hydrophilic products (log D < 0). Acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa)showed that DCF toxicity was successfully removed and no additional ecotoxicity was produced by the degradation products. Chronic ecotoxicity predictions (fish, daphnids, and algae)showed that direct photolysis would produce less toxic substances. In summary, the results point out that direct photolysis is a better choice for removing diclofenac from water, in comparison to TiO2-induced hydroxylation.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)University of São Paulo Institute of Chemistry of São Carlos Laboratório de Desenvolvimento de Tecnologias Ambientais LDTAmb, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400, Centro, P. O. Box: 780UNESP Institute of Chemistry of Araraquara Analytical Chemistry Department NDCOM, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55, QuitandinhaUniversity of São Paulo São Carlos School of Engineering Centro de Ciências da Engenharia Aplicadas ao Meio Ambiente CCEAMA, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400, Centro, P.O. Box: 292UNESP Institute of Chemistry of Araraquara Analytical Chemistry Department NDCOM, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55, QuitandinhaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pintoda Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]Spadoto, MariângelaClarice Maria Rispoli, BottaAzevedo, Eduardo Bessa2019-10-06T16:32:52Z2019-10-06T16:32:52Z2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, v. 382.1010-6030http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18919110.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.1118792-s2.0-85066453928Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:16:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189191Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:12:06.455471Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
title |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
spellingShingle |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto AOP Diclofenac Ecotoxicity Lipophilicity Photolysis TiO2 |
title_short |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
title_full |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
title_fullStr |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
title_sort |
Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis? |
author |
Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto |
author_facet |
Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP] Spadoto, Mariângela Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP] Spadoto, Mariângela Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP] Spadoto, Mariângela Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
AOP Diclofenac Ecotoxicity Lipophilicity Photolysis TiO2 |
topic |
AOP Diclofenac Ecotoxicity Lipophilicity Photolysis TiO2 |
description |
This study aimed at comparing the performance of hydroxylation and direct photolysis for removing diclofenac from water. Several parameters were assessed: degradation kinetics, mineralization degree, lipophilicity (log D)of the identified initial intermediates, acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa), and chronic ecotoxicity predictions (ECOSAR 1.11). Hydroxylation was achieved by TiO2-assisted photodegradation. Direct photolysis experiments were performed in the same reaction system, but with no TiO2 addition. At least initially (up to 10 min), both processes followed a zero order kinetics, but direct photolysis was faster than hydroxylation: k = (1.4 ± 0.038)× 10−1 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.991)and (8.7 ± 0.29)× 10−2 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.996), respectively. No mineralization was observed up to 30 min. During TiO2-assisted photodegradation, only hydroxylated intermediates were detected. Direct photolysis proceeded via carbazoles formation. Only direct photolysis was capable of forming hydrophilic products (log D < 0). Acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa)showed that DCF toxicity was successfully removed and no additional ecotoxicity was produced by the degradation products. Chronic ecotoxicity predictions (fish, daphnids, and algae)showed that direct photolysis would produce less toxic substances. In summary, the results point out that direct photolysis is a better choice for removing diclofenac from water, in comparison to TiO2-induced hydroxylation. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-06T16:32:52Z 2019-10-06T16:32:52Z 2019-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879 Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, v. 382. 1010-6030 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189191 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879 2-s2.0-85066453928 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189191 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, v. 382. 1010-6030 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879 2-s2.0-85066453928 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128770241986560 |