Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bizelli, Vinícius Ferreira [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Ramos, Edith Umasi [UNESP], Veras, Allice Santos Cruz [UNESP], Teixeira, Giovana Rampazzo [UNESP], Faverani, Leonardo P. [UNESP], Bassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050461
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240026
Resumo: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a common practice in implantology, and it is necessary to use membranes in this process. The present study aimed to evaluate the osteopromotive principle of two porcine collagen membranes in critical-size defects at rats calvaria. Ninety-six Albinus Wistar rats were divided into BG (positive control), JS, CS, and CG (negative control) groups and were sacrificed at 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The samples were assessed by histological, histometric, immunohistochemical, and microtomographic analyses. More intense inflammatory profile was seen in the JS and CS groups (p < 0.05). At 60 days, the JS group showed a satisfactory osteopromotive behavior compared to BG (p = 0.193), while CS did not demonstrate the capacity to promote bone formation. At the immunohistochemical analysis, the CS showed mild labeling for osteocalcin (OC) and osteopontin (OP), the JS demonstrated mild to moderate for OC and OP and the BG demonstrated moderate to intense for OC and OP. The tridimensional analysis found the lowest average for the total volume of newly formed bone in the CS (84,901 mm2), compared to the BG (319,834 mm2) (p < 0.05). We conclude that the different thicknesses and treatment techniques of each membrane may interfere with its biological behavior.
id UNSP_f2bc4ba577687b66aedd1fb07b093190
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240026
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Studybone regenerationinflammationmembranesGuided bone regeneration (GBR) is a common practice in implantology, and it is necessary to use membranes in this process. The present study aimed to evaluate the osteopromotive principle of two porcine collagen membranes in critical-size defects at rats calvaria. Ninety-six Albinus Wistar rats were divided into BG (positive control), JS, CS, and CG (negative control) groups and were sacrificed at 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The samples were assessed by histological, histometric, immunohistochemical, and microtomographic analyses. More intense inflammatory profile was seen in the JS and CS groups (p < 0.05). At 60 days, the JS group showed a satisfactory osteopromotive behavior compared to BG (p = 0.193), while CS did not demonstrate the capacity to promote bone formation. At the immunohistochemical analysis, the CS showed mild labeling for osteocalcin (OC) and osteopontin (OP), the JS demonstrated mild to moderate for OC and OP and the BG demonstrated moderate to intense for OC and OP. The tridimensional analysis found the lowest average for the total volume of newly formed bone in the CS (84,901 mm2), compared to the BG (319,834 mm2) (p < 0.05). We conclude that the different thicknesses and treatment techniques of each membrane may interfere with its biological behavior.Department of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua José Bonifácio, 1193 SPMulticenter Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences SBFIS São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Roberto Simonsen, 305 SPDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua José Bonifácio, 1193 SPMulticenter Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences SBFIS São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Roberto Simonsen, 305 SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Bizelli, Vinícius Ferreira [UNESP]Ramos, Edith Umasi [UNESP]Veras, Allice Santos Cruz [UNESP]Teixeira, Giovana Rampazzo [UNESP]Faverani, Leonardo P. [UNESP]Bassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]2023-03-01T19:58:08Z2023-03-01T19:58:08Z2022-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050461Membranes, v. 12, n. 5, 2022.2077-0375http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24002610.3390/membranes120504612-s2.0-85129759198Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengMembranesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T19:58:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240026Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:55:39.599996Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
title Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
spellingShingle Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
Bizelli, Vinícius Ferreira [UNESP]
bone regeneration
inflammation
membranes
title_short Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
title_full Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
title_fullStr Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
title_full_unstemmed Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
title_sort Calvaria Critical Size Defects Regeneration Using Collagen Membranes to Assess the Osteopromotive Principle: An Animal Study
author Bizelli, Vinícius Ferreira [UNESP]
author_facet Bizelli, Vinícius Ferreira [UNESP]
Ramos, Edith Umasi [UNESP]
Veras, Allice Santos Cruz [UNESP]
Teixeira, Giovana Rampazzo [UNESP]
Faverani, Leonardo P. [UNESP]
Bassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Ramos, Edith Umasi [UNESP]
Veras, Allice Santos Cruz [UNESP]
Teixeira, Giovana Rampazzo [UNESP]
Faverani, Leonardo P. [UNESP]
Bassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bizelli, Vinícius Ferreira [UNESP]
Ramos, Edith Umasi [UNESP]
Veras, Allice Santos Cruz [UNESP]
Teixeira, Giovana Rampazzo [UNESP]
Faverani, Leonardo P. [UNESP]
Bassi, Ana Paula Farnezi [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bone regeneration
inflammation
membranes
topic bone regeneration
inflammation
membranes
description Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a common practice in implantology, and it is necessary to use membranes in this process. The present study aimed to evaluate the osteopromotive principle of two porcine collagen membranes in critical-size defects at rats calvaria. Ninety-six Albinus Wistar rats were divided into BG (positive control), JS, CS, and CG (negative control) groups and were sacrificed at 7, 15, 30, and 60 days postoperatively. The samples were assessed by histological, histometric, immunohistochemical, and microtomographic analyses. More intense inflammatory profile was seen in the JS and CS groups (p < 0.05). At 60 days, the JS group showed a satisfactory osteopromotive behavior compared to BG (p = 0.193), while CS did not demonstrate the capacity to promote bone formation. At the immunohistochemical analysis, the CS showed mild labeling for osteocalcin (OC) and osteopontin (OP), the JS demonstrated mild to moderate for OC and OP and the BG demonstrated moderate to intense for OC and OP. The tridimensional analysis found the lowest average for the total volume of newly formed bone in the CS (84,901 mm2), compared to the BG (319,834 mm2) (p < 0.05). We conclude that the different thicknesses and treatment techniques of each membrane may interfere with its biological behavior.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01
2023-03-01T19:58:08Z
2023-03-01T19:58:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050461
Membranes, v. 12, n. 5, 2022.
2077-0375
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240026
10.3390/membranes12050461
2-s2.0-85129759198
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050461
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240026
identifier_str_mv Membranes, v. 12, n. 5, 2022.
2077-0375
10.3390/membranes12050461
2-s2.0-85129759198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Membranes
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128876605341696