Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Liu, Shoujia
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: He, Tuo, Wang, Jiajun, Chen, Jiabao, Guo, Juan, Jiang, Xiaomei, Wiedenhoeft, Alex C. [UNESP], Yin, Yafang
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240628
Resumo: Due to increasing global trade of timber commodities and illegal logging activities, wood species listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) appendices are facing extinction, and their international trade has been banned or is under supervision. Reliable and applicable species-level discrimination methods have become urgent to protect global forest resources and promote the legal trade of timbers. This study aims to discriminate CITES-listed species from their look-alikes in international trade using quantitative wood anatomy (QWA) data coupled with machine learning (ML) analysis. Herein, the QWA data of 14 CITES-listed species and 15 of their look-alike species were collected from microscope slide collection, and four ML classifiers, J48, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, and SMO, were used to analyze the QWA data. The results indicated that ML classifiers exhibited better performance than traditional wood identification methods. Specifically, Multinomial Naïve Bayes outperformed other classifiers, and successfully discriminated CITES-listed Pterocarpus species from their look-alike species with an accuracy of 95.83%. Furthermore, the discrimination accuracy was affected by the combinations of wood anatomical features, and combinations with fewer features included could result in higher accuracy at the species level. In conclusion, the QWA data coupled with ML analysis could unlock the potential of wood anatomy to discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes for forensic applications.
id UNSP_f5070cbef4a5e5bf05a8642732808465
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240628
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?Due to increasing global trade of timber commodities and illegal logging activities, wood species listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) appendices are facing extinction, and their international trade has been banned or is under supervision. Reliable and applicable species-level discrimination methods have become urgent to protect global forest resources and promote the legal trade of timbers. This study aims to discriminate CITES-listed species from their look-alikes in international trade using quantitative wood anatomy (QWA) data coupled with machine learning (ML) analysis. Herein, the QWA data of 14 CITES-listed species and 15 of their look-alike species were collected from microscope slide collection, and four ML classifiers, J48, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, and SMO, were used to analyze the QWA data. The results indicated that ML classifiers exhibited better performance than traditional wood identification methods. Specifically, Multinomial Naïve Bayes outperformed other classifiers, and successfully discriminated CITES-listed Pterocarpus species from their look-alike species with an accuracy of 95.83%. Furthermore, the discrimination accuracy was affected by the combinations of wood anatomical features, and combinations with fewer features included could result in higher accuracy at the species level. In conclusion, the QWA data coupled with ML analysis could unlock the potential of wood anatomy to discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes for forensic applications.Department of Wood Anatomy and Utilization Research Institute of Wood Industry Chinese Academy of ForestryWood Collections Chinese Academy of ForestryCenter for Wood Anatomy Research Forest Products Laboratory USDA Forest ServiceDepartment of Botany University of WisconsinDepartment of Forestry and National Resources Purdue UniversityCiências Biológicas (Botânica) Universidade Estadual Paulista, São PauloDepartment of Sustainable Biomaterials Mississippi State UniversityCiências Biológicas (Botânica) Universidade Estadual Paulista, São PauloChinese Academy of ForestryUSDA Forest ServiceUniversity of WisconsinPurdue UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mississippi State UniversityLiu, ShoujiaHe, TuoWang, JiajunChen, JiabaoGuo, JuanJiang, XiaomeiWiedenhoeft, Alex C. [UNESP]Yin, Yafang2023-03-01T20:25:42Z2023-03-01T20:25:42Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-022-01404-yWood Science and Technology.1432-52250043-7719http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24062810.1007/s00226-022-01404-y2-s2.0-85135798152Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengWood Science and Technologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:25:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240628Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-03-01T20:25:42Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
title Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
spellingShingle Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
Liu, Shoujia
title_short Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
title_full Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
title_fullStr Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
title_full_unstemmed Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
title_sort Can quantitative wood anatomy data coupled with machine learning analysis discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes?
author Liu, Shoujia
author_facet Liu, Shoujia
He, Tuo
Wang, Jiajun
Chen, Jiabao
Guo, Juan
Jiang, Xiaomei
Wiedenhoeft, Alex C. [UNESP]
Yin, Yafang
author_role author
author2 He, Tuo
Wang, Jiajun
Chen, Jiabao
Guo, Juan
Jiang, Xiaomei
Wiedenhoeft, Alex C. [UNESP]
Yin, Yafang
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Chinese Academy of Forestry
USDA Forest Service
University of Wisconsin
Purdue University
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Mississippi State University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Liu, Shoujia
He, Tuo
Wang, Jiajun
Chen, Jiabao
Guo, Juan
Jiang, Xiaomei
Wiedenhoeft, Alex C. [UNESP]
Yin, Yafang
description Due to increasing global trade of timber commodities and illegal logging activities, wood species listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) appendices are facing extinction, and their international trade has been banned or is under supervision. Reliable and applicable species-level discrimination methods have become urgent to protect global forest resources and promote the legal trade of timbers. This study aims to discriminate CITES-listed species from their look-alikes in international trade using quantitative wood anatomy (QWA) data coupled with machine learning (ML) analysis. Herein, the QWA data of 14 CITES-listed species and 15 of their look-alike species were collected from microscope slide collection, and four ML classifiers, J48, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Random Forest, and SMO, were used to analyze the QWA data. The results indicated that ML classifiers exhibited better performance than traditional wood identification methods. Specifically, Multinomial Naïve Bayes outperformed other classifiers, and successfully discriminated CITES-listed Pterocarpus species from their look-alike species with an accuracy of 95.83%. Furthermore, the discrimination accuracy was affected by the combinations of wood anatomical features, and combinations with fewer features included could result in higher accuracy at the species level. In conclusion, the QWA data coupled with ML analysis could unlock the potential of wood anatomy to discriminate CITES species from their look-alikes for forensic applications.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T20:25:42Z
2023-03-01T20:25:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
Wood Science and Technology.
1432-5225
0043-7719
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240628
10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
2-s2.0-85135798152
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240628
identifier_str_mv Wood Science and Technology.
1432-5225
0043-7719
10.1007/s00226-022-01404-y
2-s2.0-85135798152
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Wood Science and Technology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803046600140914688