Interference of the assessment method in pH values of an epoxy-based cement

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Daniele Fockink da
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Outros Autores: Stang, Elize Cristina, Campos, Edson Alves [UNESP], Kuga, Milton Carlos [UNESP], Faria, Gisele [UNESP], Kuga, Gabriel Keine
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://revodonto.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-56852012000200003&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/125882
• topic: pH; Resin cement; Distilled water

Introduction: Alkalinization potential is a fundamental property of endodontic epoxy-based cements containing calcium hydroxide. Studies have shown discrepant pH results for same materials at different evaluation periods. A possible reason accounting for these differences may be the assessment procedures. Objective: To evaluate the pH value of an epoxy-based cement (Sealer 26) in different periods of analysis, using two assessment methods. Material and methods: Sealer 26 was manipulated and immediately placed into polyethylene tubes (n=10, each group) and immersed in distilled water. In G1, the tubes were kept in the same water during all experiment; and in G2, the tubes were removed and placed into another flask with an equal amount of water after the pH evaluation. The pH of these solutions was measured at 24 hours, 7, 14 and 28 days. Analysis were made within the same group according to the experimental periods and between groups in each experimental period. Data were submitted to ANOVA (α = 5%) and t test, respectively. Results: For G1 and G2, all periods showed different pH values (p < 0.05), except between 14 and 28 days (p > 0.05) and between 7 and 14 days (p > 0.05), respectively. In each period, no significant differences were observed between the groups. Conclusion: The method to obtain the pH values in different experimental periods no interfered in the final results. However, difference was observed when the results were analyzed at same group.