One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mailart, Mariane C. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Sakassegawa, Paula A. [UNESP], Santos, Karine C. [UNESP], Torres, Carlos R. G. [UNESP], Palo, Renato M. [UNESP], Borges, Alessandra B. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12814
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222294
Resumo: Objective: To compare at-home systems with reduced daily time of use (10% hydrogen peroxide [HP] gel with prefilled (PT) or customized trays (CT), and 10% carbamide peroxide [CP] gel), with the conventional nightguard vital bleaching (10% CP). Bleaching efficacy, adverse effects, and patient's satisfaction were evaluated. Methods: Sixty participants were randomly divided into treatments (14 days): Opalescence GO (OGO)-10%HP PT-30 min, White Class-10%HP CT-30 min, Opalescence PF-10%CP CT-2 h, and Opalescence PF-10%CP CT-8 h. Color difference (visual and spectrophotometer), tooth sensitivity (visual analogue scale), gingival condition (Löe index), enamel mineralization (laser fluorescence), and patients' satisfaction (questionnaire) were assessed. Statistical tests were applied (5%). Results: After 1 year, color difference was similar for the groups (p > 0.05). All groups showed similar sensitivity risk (p > 0.05). The intensity of sensitivity and gingival irritation was mild for all gels, but higher for OGO. Fluorescence after bleaching remained similar to those of sound enamel. All participants were satisfied with treatments. Conclusions: All systems produced similar bleaching efficacy, which was maintained after 1 year. Patients were satisfied with bleaching outcomes. Tooth sensitivity occurred in all groups, but with overall mild intensity. No relevant gingival irritation and enamel demineralization was observed. Clinical significance: Bleaching with 10% HP gels in prefilled and CTs represent efficacious alternative for tooth color change, with patients' acceptance similar to conventional 10% CP. Patients must be warned about the mild sensitivity and gingival irritation potential, mainly with PTs.
id UNSP_fa70f93ca5973d27fd81c98c19b230f0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222294
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trialbleaching agentsgingivahydrogen peroxidetooth bleachingtooth sensitivityObjective: To compare at-home systems with reduced daily time of use (10% hydrogen peroxide [HP] gel with prefilled (PT) or customized trays (CT), and 10% carbamide peroxide [CP] gel), with the conventional nightguard vital bleaching (10% CP). Bleaching efficacy, adverse effects, and patient's satisfaction were evaluated. Methods: Sixty participants were randomly divided into treatments (14 days): Opalescence GO (OGO)-10%HP PT-30 min, White Class-10%HP CT-30 min, Opalescence PF-10%CP CT-2 h, and Opalescence PF-10%CP CT-8 h. Color difference (visual and spectrophotometer), tooth sensitivity (visual analogue scale), gingival condition (Löe index), enamel mineralization (laser fluorescence), and patients' satisfaction (questionnaire) were assessed. Statistical tests were applied (5%). Results: After 1 year, color difference was similar for the groups (p > 0.05). All groups showed similar sensitivity risk (p > 0.05). The intensity of sensitivity and gingival irritation was mild for all gels, but higher for OGO. Fluorescence after bleaching remained similar to those of sound enamel. All participants were satisfied with treatments. Conclusions: All systems produced similar bleaching efficacy, which was maintained after 1 year. Patients were satisfied with bleaching outcomes. Tooth sensitivity occurred in all groups, but with overall mild intensity. No relevant gingival irritation and enamel demineralization was observed. Clinical significance: Bleaching with 10% HP gels in prefilled and CTs represent efficacious alternative for tooth color change, with patients' acceptance similar to conventional 10% CP. Patients must be warned about the mild sensitivity and gingival irritation potential, mainly with PTs.Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Department of Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Mailart, Mariane C. [UNESP]Sakassegawa, Paula A. [UNESP]Santos, Karine C. [UNESP]Torres, Carlos R. G. [UNESP]Palo, Renato M. [UNESP]Borges, Alessandra B. [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:43:45Z2022-04-28T19:43:45Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12814Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.1708-82401496-4155http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22229410.1111/jerd.128142-s2.0-85113683241Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:43:45Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/222294Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:43:45Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
title One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
Mailart, Mariane C. [UNESP]
bleaching agents
gingiva
hydrogen peroxide
tooth bleaching
tooth sensitivity
title_short One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
title_full One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
title_sort One-year follow-up comparing at-home bleaching systems outcomes and the impact on patient's satisfaction: Randomized clinical trial
author Mailart, Mariane C. [UNESP]
author_facet Mailart, Mariane C. [UNESP]
Sakassegawa, Paula A. [UNESP]
Santos, Karine C. [UNESP]
Torres, Carlos R. G. [UNESP]
Palo, Renato M. [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra B. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Sakassegawa, Paula A. [UNESP]
Santos, Karine C. [UNESP]
Torres, Carlos R. G. [UNESP]
Palo, Renato M. [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra B. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mailart, Mariane C. [UNESP]
Sakassegawa, Paula A. [UNESP]
Santos, Karine C. [UNESP]
Torres, Carlos R. G. [UNESP]
Palo, Renato M. [UNESP]
Borges, Alessandra B. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bleaching agents
gingiva
hydrogen peroxide
tooth bleaching
tooth sensitivity
topic bleaching agents
gingiva
hydrogen peroxide
tooth bleaching
tooth sensitivity
description Objective: To compare at-home systems with reduced daily time of use (10% hydrogen peroxide [HP] gel with prefilled (PT) or customized trays (CT), and 10% carbamide peroxide [CP] gel), with the conventional nightguard vital bleaching (10% CP). Bleaching efficacy, adverse effects, and patient's satisfaction were evaluated. Methods: Sixty participants were randomly divided into treatments (14 days): Opalescence GO (OGO)-10%HP PT-30 min, White Class-10%HP CT-30 min, Opalescence PF-10%CP CT-2 h, and Opalescence PF-10%CP CT-8 h. Color difference (visual and spectrophotometer), tooth sensitivity (visual analogue scale), gingival condition (Löe index), enamel mineralization (laser fluorescence), and patients' satisfaction (questionnaire) were assessed. Statistical tests were applied (5%). Results: After 1 year, color difference was similar for the groups (p > 0.05). All groups showed similar sensitivity risk (p > 0.05). The intensity of sensitivity and gingival irritation was mild for all gels, but higher for OGO. Fluorescence after bleaching remained similar to those of sound enamel. All participants were satisfied with treatments. Conclusions: All systems produced similar bleaching efficacy, which was maintained after 1 year. Patients were satisfied with bleaching outcomes. Tooth sensitivity occurred in all groups, but with overall mild intensity. No relevant gingival irritation and enamel demineralization was observed. Clinical significance: Bleaching with 10% HP gels in prefilled and CTs represent efficacious alternative for tooth color change, with patients' acceptance similar to conventional 10% CP. Patients must be warned about the mild sensitivity and gingival irritation potential, mainly with PTs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-04-28T19:43:45Z
2022-04-28T19:43:45Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12814
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.
1708-8240
1496-4155
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222294
10.1111/jerd.12814
2-s2.0-85113683241
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12814
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/222294
identifier_str_mv Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry.
1708-8240
1496-4155
10.1111/jerd.12814
2-s2.0-85113683241
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790283004379136