Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Fontolan, O. L. [UNESP], Pardo, P. E., Bremer Neto, H., Sartori, Alexandrina [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
DOI: 10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69163
Resumo: In this study, we compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies induced by inactivated rabies vaccine in cattle by using three alternative immunization procedures. Forty-five bovines (breed nelore) were then organized in three groups (A, B and C, with 15 animals/group). Group A received only one vaccine dose at day zero and Group B received the first dose at day zero and then another dose at day 30 (early booster). Group C was also immunized with two doses; however, the booster was postponed until day 180 after the first dose (delayed booster). Blood samples were withdrawn at days zero (before the first dose) and 30, 210, 390, and 540 after the beginning of immunization and the antibody titers were evaluated by mouse neutralization test. The protocol used to immunize Group C (booster at day 180) was clearly more efficient. In this group, antibody levels were higher and also remained higher for longer periods in comparison with the other two groups. These results show that booster timing significantly affected antibody levels. Therefore, programs addressed to control this disease in cattle should consider not only the use of a booster but also its administration time.
id UNSP_fa97a53fd947e396060745ed844bcc67
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69163
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabiesAntibodyCattleNeutralizationRabiesVaccineBos taurusIn this study, we compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies induced by inactivated rabies vaccine in cattle by using three alternative immunization procedures. Forty-five bovines (breed nelore) were then organized in three groups (A, B and C, with 15 animals/group). Group A received only one vaccine dose at day zero and Group B received the first dose at day zero and then another dose at day 30 (early booster). Group C was also immunized with two doses; however, the booster was postponed until day 180 after the first dose (delayed booster). Blood samples were withdrawn at days zero (before the first dose) and 30, 210, 390, and 540 after the beginning of immunization and the antibody titers were evaluated by mouse neutralization test. The protocol used to immunize Group C (booster at day 180) was clearly more efficient. In this group, antibody levels were higher and also remained higher for longer periods in comparison with the other two groups. These results show that booster timing significantly affected antibody levels. Therefore, programs addressed to control this disease in cattle should consider not only the use of a booster but also its administration time.Department of Tropical Diseases and Diagnostic Imaging Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo StateDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo StateSchool of Veterinary Medicine UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SPPólo Regional da Alta Sorocabana APTA, Caixa Postal 298, Presidente Prudente, SP, 19001-970Department of Tropical Diseases and Diagnostic Imaging Botucatu School of Medicine São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo StateDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology Institute of Biosciences São Paulo State University, Botucatu, São Paulo StateUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA)Albas, Avelino [UNESP]Fontolan, O. L. [UNESP]Pardo, P. E.Bremer Neto, H.Sartori, Alexandrina [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:22:00Z2014-05-27T11:22:00Z2006-10-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article476-486application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, v. 12, n. 3, p. 476-486, 2006.1678-9199http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6916310.1590/S1678-91992006000300010S1678-91992006000300010WOS:0002462816000102-s2.0-337491683672-s2.0-33749168367.pdf4977572416129527Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases1.7820,573info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-15T15:23:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69163Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-15T15:23:27Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
title Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
spellingShingle Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
Antibody
Cattle
Neutralization
Rabies
Vaccine
Bos taurus
Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
Antibody
Cattle
Neutralization
Rabies
Vaccine
Bos taurus
title_short Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
title_full Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
title_fullStr Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
title_full_unstemmed Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
title_sort Interval between first dose and booster affected antibody production in cattle vaccinated against rabies
author Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
author_facet Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
Fontolan, O. L. [UNESP]
Pardo, P. E.
Bremer Neto, H.
Sartori, Alexandrina [UNESP]
Fontolan, O. L. [UNESP]
Pardo, P. E.
Bremer Neto, H.
Sartori, Alexandrina [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Fontolan, O. L. [UNESP]
Pardo, P. E.
Bremer Neto, H.
Sartori, Alexandrina [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Albas, Avelino [UNESP]
Fontolan, O. L. [UNESP]
Pardo, P. E.
Bremer Neto, H.
Sartori, Alexandrina [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antibody
Cattle
Neutralization
Rabies
Vaccine
Bos taurus
topic Antibody
Cattle
Neutralization
Rabies
Vaccine
Bos taurus
description In this study, we compared the levels of neutralizing antibodies induced by inactivated rabies vaccine in cattle by using three alternative immunization procedures. Forty-five bovines (breed nelore) were then organized in three groups (A, B and C, with 15 animals/group). Group A received only one vaccine dose at day zero and Group B received the first dose at day zero and then another dose at day 30 (early booster). Group C was also immunized with two doses; however, the booster was postponed until day 180 after the first dose (delayed booster). Blood samples were withdrawn at days zero (before the first dose) and 30, 210, 390, and 540 after the beginning of immunization and the antibody titers were evaluated by mouse neutralization test. The protocol used to immunize Group C (booster at day 180) was clearly more efficient. In this group, antibody levels were higher and also remained higher for longer periods in comparison with the other two groups. These results show that booster timing significantly affected antibody levels. Therefore, programs addressed to control this disease in cattle should consider not only the use of a booster but also its administration time.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-10-05
2014-05-27T11:22:00Z
2014-05-27T11:22:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010
Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, v. 12, n. 3, p. 476-486, 2006.
1678-9199
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69163
10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010
S1678-91992006000300010
WOS:000246281600010
2-s2.0-33749168367
2-s2.0-33749168367.pdf
4977572416129527
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69163
identifier_str_mv Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, v. 12, n. 3, p. 476-486, 2006.
1678-9199
10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010
S1678-91992006000300010
WOS:000246281600010
2-s2.0-33749168367
2-s2.0-33749168367.pdf
4977572416129527
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases
1.782
0,573
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 476-486
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822182519874781184
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-91992006000300010