Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx041 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179780 |
Resumo: | This article aims to contribute to the discussion on authorship in contemporary science from Foucauldian and Kuhnian perspectives, highlighting the social aspects of science and the role of authorship in scientific revolutions. Thus, it describes the functions of the 'author' discussed by Foucault that can assist to reveal the characteristics of the scientific practice and examples of how theories are materialized. As a result, it identifies the ways in which modern science is developed and how knowledge is construed by multiple authors, group authors, the merit that is attributed by citations, etc. This article highlights the complexity of authorship attribution and the need to rethink generalized bibliometric techniques to evaluate science considering other aspects that go beyond the mere listing of the authors. |
id |
UNSP_fd258c3d589e5c6c0207638f0cde62b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179780 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspectiveauthorshipFoucaultKuhnscientometricssociology of scienceThis article aims to contribute to the discussion on authorship in contemporary science from Foucauldian and Kuhnian perspectives, highlighting the social aspects of science and the role of authorship in scientific revolutions. Thus, it describes the functions of the 'author' discussed by Foucault that can assist to reveal the characteristics of the scientific practice and examples of how theories are materialized. As a result, it identifies the ways in which modern science is developed and how knowledge is construed by multiple authors, group authors, the merit that is attributed by citations, etc. This article highlights the complexity of authorship attribution and the need to rethink generalized bibliometric techniques to evaluate science considering other aspects that go beyond the mere listing of the authors.São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737School of Information Science University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM), P.O. Box 413São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM)Hilário, Carla Mara [UNESP]Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP]Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini [UNESP]Wolfram, DIetmar2018-12-11T17:36:44Z2018-12-11T17:36:44Z2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article63-72application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx041Research Evaluation, v. 27, n. 2, p. 63-72, 2018.1471-54490958-2029http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17978010.1093/reseval/rvx0412-s2.0-850455078462-s2.0-85045507846.pdf5170688300970006Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengResearch Evaluation1,2671,267info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-09T18:36:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/179780Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-08-09T18:36:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
title |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
spellingShingle |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective Hilário, Carla Mara [UNESP] authorship Foucault Kuhn scientometrics sociology of science |
title_short |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
title_full |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
title_fullStr |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
title_sort |
Authorship in science: A critical analysis from a Foucauldian perspective |
author |
Hilário, Carla Mara [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Hilário, Carla Mara [UNESP] Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP] Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini [UNESP] Wolfram, DIetmar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP] Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini [UNESP] Wolfram, DIetmar |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hilário, Carla Mara [UNESP] Martínez-Ávila, Daniel [UNESP] Grácio, Maria Cláudia Cabrini [UNESP] Wolfram, DIetmar |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
authorship Foucault Kuhn scientometrics sociology of science |
topic |
authorship Foucault Kuhn scientometrics sociology of science |
description |
This article aims to contribute to the discussion on authorship in contemporary science from Foucauldian and Kuhnian perspectives, highlighting the social aspects of science and the role of authorship in scientific revolutions. Thus, it describes the functions of the 'author' discussed by Foucault that can assist to reveal the characteristics of the scientific practice and examples of how theories are materialized. As a result, it identifies the ways in which modern science is developed and how knowledge is construed by multiple authors, group authors, the merit that is attributed by citations, etc. This article highlights the complexity of authorship attribution and the need to rethink generalized bibliometric techniques to evaluate science considering other aspects that go beyond the mere listing of the authors. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-11T17:36:44Z 2018-12-11T17:36:44Z 2018-04-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx041 Research Evaluation, v. 27, n. 2, p. 63-72, 2018. 1471-5449 0958-2029 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179780 10.1093/reseval/rvx041 2-s2.0-85045507846 2-s2.0-85045507846.pdf 5170688300970006 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx041 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/179780 |
identifier_str_mv |
Research Evaluation, v. 27, n. 2, p. 63-72, 2018. 1471-5449 0958-2029 10.1093/reseval/rvx041 2-s2.0-85045507846 2-s2.0-85045507846.pdf 5170688300970006 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Research Evaluation 1,267 1,267 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
63-72 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1826304579041492992 |