Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lepper, Fábio Gustavo Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Ramos, Tamara M., Trindade Filho, José C.S., Vale, Fabiana R., Padovani, Carlos R., Goissis, Gilberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230924
Resumo: Introduction: The use of bowel segments to perform bladder augmentation is associated with several metabolic and surgical complications. A great variety of synthetic materials, biodegradable or not, have been tested. Collagen-based biomaterials have shown effectiveness for the regeneration and obtainment of a functional bladder. Objective: Assess the functional and histological response of the rabbit bladder to anionic collagen membrane (ACM), either when it is anastomosed to the bladder or it is placed onto bladder after vesicomyectomy. Materials and methods: In 15 male rabbit a partial cystectomy was performed. After 4 weeks they were divided in 3 groups. Group 1 (G1)-bladder augmentation with ACM. Group 2 (G2) ACM is placed onto bladder after vesicomyectomy. Group 3 (G3) control group. Maximal bladder capacity (MBC) and weight were assessed with 4 (M1), 8 (M2) and 12 (M3) weeks after partial cystectomy. In M3 was performed the sacrifice and extraction of the bladder and kidneys for anatomopathologic study. Results: There were neither bladder stones, nor implant extrusion in M3. There was a significant increase in MBC in G1 and G2 (p<0.05), but no statistical differences in G3 (p=0.35). There is no significant difference comparing G1 and G2. In M3, both groups have shown a bigger MBC than G3 (p<0.05). The microscopic assessment showed an inflammatory reaction in the bladder augmented, with urothelium preserved. Conclusions: The ACM was effective for the increase of MBC. The bladders with preservation of the urothelium have shown an extensive inflammatory process.
id UNSP_fed96fb49a8db49337de95b13390f95d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230924
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluationBladderCollagenRabbit modelTransplantUrodynamicsIntroduction: The use of bowel segments to perform bladder augmentation is associated with several metabolic and surgical complications. A great variety of synthetic materials, biodegradable or not, have been tested. Collagen-based biomaterials have shown effectiveness for the regeneration and obtainment of a functional bladder. Objective: Assess the functional and histological response of the rabbit bladder to anionic collagen membrane (ACM), either when it is anastomosed to the bladder or it is placed onto bladder after vesicomyectomy. Materials and methods: In 15 male rabbit a partial cystectomy was performed. After 4 weeks they were divided in 3 groups. Group 1 (G1)-bladder augmentation with ACM. Group 2 (G2) ACM is placed onto bladder after vesicomyectomy. Group 3 (G3) control group. Maximal bladder capacity (MBC) and weight were assessed with 4 (M1), 8 (M2) and 12 (M3) weeks after partial cystectomy. In M3 was performed the sacrifice and extraction of the bladder and kidneys for anatomopathologic study. Results: There were neither bladder stones, nor implant extrusion in M3. There was a significant increase in MBC in G1 and G2 (p<0.05), but no statistical differences in G3 (p=0.35). There is no significant difference comparing G1 and G2. In M3, both groups have shown a bigger MBC than G3 (p<0.05). The microscopic assessment showed an inflammatory reaction in the bladder augmented, with urothelium preserved. Conclusions: The ACM was effective for the increase of MBC. The bladders with preservation of the urothelium have shown an extensive inflammatory process.Department of Urology Botucatu School of Medicine State University of São Paulo, R. Cr. Manoel Luiz dos Santos 465/24, Botucatu, SP 18603-310Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Lepper, Fábio Gustavo OliveiraRamos, Tamara M.Trindade Filho, José C.S.Vale, Fabiana R.Padovani, Carlos R.Goissis, Gilberto2022-04-29T08:42:46Z2022-04-29T08:42:46Z2002-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article464-469International Braz J Urol, v. 28, n. 5, p. 464-469, 2002.1677-5538http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2309242-s2.0-0036765749Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Braz J Urolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-03T14:30:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/230924Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-03T14:30:12Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
title Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
spellingShingle Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
Lepper, Fábio Gustavo Oliveira
Bladder
Collagen
Rabbit model
Transplant
Urodynamics
title_short Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
title_full Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
title_fullStr Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
title_sort Bladder augmentation in rabbits with anionic collagen membrane, with or without urotelial preservation. Cistometric and hystologic evaluation
author Lepper, Fábio Gustavo Oliveira
author_facet Lepper, Fábio Gustavo Oliveira
Ramos, Tamara M.
Trindade Filho, José C.S.
Vale, Fabiana R.
Padovani, Carlos R.
Goissis, Gilberto
author_role author
author2 Ramos, Tamara M.
Trindade Filho, José C.S.
Vale, Fabiana R.
Padovani, Carlos R.
Goissis, Gilberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lepper, Fábio Gustavo Oliveira
Ramos, Tamara M.
Trindade Filho, José C.S.
Vale, Fabiana R.
Padovani, Carlos R.
Goissis, Gilberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bladder
Collagen
Rabbit model
Transplant
Urodynamics
topic Bladder
Collagen
Rabbit model
Transplant
Urodynamics
description Introduction: The use of bowel segments to perform bladder augmentation is associated with several metabolic and surgical complications. A great variety of synthetic materials, biodegradable or not, have been tested. Collagen-based biomaterials have shown effectiveness for the regeneration and obtainment of a functional bladder. Objective: Assess the functional and histological response of the rabbit bladder to anionic collagen membrane (ACM), either when it is anastomosed to the bladder or it is placed onto bladder after vesicomyectomy. Materials and methods: In 15 male rabbit a partial cystectomy was performed. After 4 weeks they were divided in 3 groups. Group 1 (G1)-bladder augmentation with ACM. Group 2 (G2) ACM is placed onto bladder after vesicomyectomy. Group 3 (G3) control group. Maximal bladder capacity (MBC) and weight were assessed with 4 (M1), 8 (M2) and 12 (M3) weeks after partial cystectomy. In M3 was performed the sacrifice and extraction of the bladder and kidneys for anatomopathologic study. Results: There were neither bladder stones, nor implant extrusion in M3. There was a significant increase in MBC in G1 and G2 (p<0.05), but no statistical differences in G3 (p=0.35). There is no significant difference comparing G1 and G2. In M3, both groups have shown a bigger MBC than G3 (p<0.05). The microscopic assessment showed an inflammatory reaction in the bladder augmented, with urothelium preserved. Conclusions: The ACM was effective for the increase of MBC. The bladders with preservation of the urothelium have shown an extensive inflammatory process.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-09-01
2022-04-29T08:42:46Z
2022-04-29T08:42:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol, v. 28, n. 5, p. 464-469, 2002.
1677-5538
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230924
2-s2.0-0036765749
identifier_str_mv International Braz J Urol, v. 28, n. 5, p. 464-469, 2002.
1677-5538
2-s2.0-0036765749
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/230924
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 464-469
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1810021401410666496