The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9223 |
Resumo: | The article here structured as an objective to present an analysis from a hermeneutics that reconciles constitutional efficiency in the field of Brazilian criminal procedure. Therefore, from the topic of precautionary measures, we will work with three principles, the axioms of Jurisdictionality and Motivation, Provisionality and Provisionality, and, finally, Exceptionality. So, from a bibliographic study we are concerned with the central hypothesis that the Brazilian punitive procedure, inserted in a logic of social exclusion, finds itself as the only normative limit principles that usually are forgotten in forensic practice. |
id |
UPF-4_14b3790d435c7d636a2aacb6e2ee2341 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.upf.br:article/9223 |
network_acronym_str |
UPF-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneuticsLos principios de la cautelaridad procesal penal: una visión desde la hermenéutica constitucionalThe article here structured as an objective to present an analysis from a hermeneutics that reconciles constitutional efficiency in the field of Brazilian criminal procedure. Therefore, from the topic of precautionary measures, we will work with three principles, the axioms of Jurisdictionality and Motivation, Provisionality and Provisionality, and, finally, Exceptionality. So, from a bibliographic study we are concerned with the central hypothesis that the Brazilian punitive procedure, inserted in a logic of social exclusion, finds itself as the only normative limit principles that usually are forgotten in forensic practice.El artículo aquí estructurado tiene como objetivo presentar un análisis a partir de la hermenéutica que reconoce la eficacia constitucional en la esfera del proceso penal brasileño. De esta manera, a partir del tema de la cautelaridad vamos a trabajar con tres principios, cuales son, los axiomas de la Jurisdiccionalidad y de la Motivación, la Provisionalidad y Provisoriedad, y, por fin, la Excepcionalidad. Para ello, a partir de un estudio bibliográfico tenemos como hipótesis central que el procedimiento punitivista brasileño, insertado en una lógica de exclusión social, encuentra aún como único límite normativo principios que usualmente son olvidados en la práctica forense.El artículo aquí estructurado tiene como objetivo presentar un análisis a partir de la hermenéutica que reconoce la eficacia constitucional en la esfera del proceso penal brasileño. De esta manera, a partir del tema de la cautelaridad vamos a trabajar con tres principios, cuales son, los axiomas de la Jurisdiccionalidad y de la Motivación, la Provisionalidad y Provisoriedad, y, por fin, la Excepcionalidad. Para ello, a partir de un estudio bibliográfico tenemos como hipótesis central que el procedimiento punitivista brasileño, insertado en una lógica de exclusión social, encuentra aún como único límite normativo principios que usualmente son olvidados en la práctica forense.Universidade de Passo Fundo2019-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/922310.5335/rjd.v33i1.9223Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 1 (2019); 78-93Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 1 (2019); 78-932238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFspahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9223/114114644Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGadelha Xavier, BrunoKrohling, Aloísio2019-07-10T18:58:23Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/9223Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2019-07-10T18:58:23Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics Los principios de la cautelaridad procesal penal: una visión desde la hermenéutica constitucional |
title |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics |
spellingShingle |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics Gadelha Xavier, Bruno |
title_short |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics |
title_full |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics |
title_fullStr |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics |
title_full_unstemmed |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics |
title_sort |
The principles of procedural criminal prosecution: a vision from the constitutional hermeneutics |
author |
Gadelha Xavier, Bruno |
author_facet |
Gadelha Xavier, Bruno Krohling, Aloísio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Krohling, Aloísio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gadelha Xavier, Bruno Krohling, Aloísio |
description |
The article here structured as an objective to present an analysis from a hermeneutics that reconciles constitutional efficiency in the field of Brazilian criminal procedure. Therefore, from the topic of precautionary measures, we will work with three principles, the axioms of Jurisdictionality and Motivation, Provisionality and Provisionality, and, finally, Exceptionality. So, from a bibliographic study we are concerned with the central hypothesis that the Brazilian punitive procedure, inserted in a logic of social exclusion, finds itself as the only normative limit principles that usually are forgotten in forensic practice. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9223 10.5335/rjd.v33i1.9223 |
url |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9223 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5335/rjd.v33i1.9223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9223/114114644 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 1 (2019); 78-93 Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 1 (2019); 78-93 2238-3212 1413-7038 reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) instacron:UPF |
instname_str |
Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
instacron_str |
UPF |
institution |
UPF |
reponame_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
collection |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1776750980470145024 |