Deference to public choices

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Hogemann, Edna Raquel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591
Resumo: This work aims to identify the limits of the judicial decision on the planned choices of the public administration and to describe the possible consequences of the law 13.655/2018. Starting from the decision of the North American Supreme Court on the Chevron case, specifically with regard to the bases of the judicial deference to the administrative rules, the research focuses its focus on the action of the judiciary on public choices which are justified by the technical circumstances and specificity, affecting the administrative act, according to legislative delimitation and prior planning. Aiming to achieve the objective described above, the dialectical-descriptive methodology is used, which encompasses the survey of the bibliography focused on the theme, as well as the comparison of theoretical concepts that enable the construction of critical descriptions, the understanding of the practical effects of decision-making processes in the administrative environment and detecting the reasons that lead to judicial interventions on the judgment of the Administration.
id UPF-4_67e5a95070ae2334044f5a5140575215
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.upf.br:article/9591
network_acronym_str UPF-4
network_name_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Deference to public choicesDeferência com as escolhas públicasThis work aims to identify the limits of the judicial decision on the planned choices of the public administration and to describe the possible consequences of the law 13.655/2018. Starting from the decision of the North American Supreme Court on the Chevron case, specifically with regard to the bases of the judicial deference to the administrative rules, the research focuses its focus on the action of the judiciary on public choices which are justified by the technical circumstances and specificity, affecting the administrative act, according to legislative delimitation and prior planning. Aiming to achieve the objective described above, the dialectical-descriptive methodology is used, which encompasses the survey of the bibliography focused on the theme, as well as the comparison of theoretical concepts that enable the construction of critical descriptions, the understanding of the practical effects of decision-making processes in the administrative environment and detecting the reasons that lead to judicial interventions on the judgment of the Administration.Este trabalho tem por objetivo identificar os limites decisão judicial sobre as escolhas planejadas da Administração Pública e descrever os possíveis desdobramentos da Lei 13.655/2018. Partindo-se da decisão da Suprema Corte norte americana sobre o caso Chevron, especificamente no que se refere às bases da deferência judicial para as regras administrativas, a pesquisa volta seu foco contra a atuação do Poder Judiciário sobre as escolhas públicas que se justificam pelas circunstâncias e especificidade técnica, afetas ao agir administrativo, conforme delimitação legislativa e planejamento prévio. Visando atingir o objetivo acima descrito, é empregada a metodologia dialético-descritiva que engloba o levantamento da bibliografia voltada para a temática, bem como a comparação de conceitos teóricos que viabilizem a construção de descrições críticas, a compreensão dos efeitos práticos dos processos de tomada de decisão no ambiente administrativo e detectar os motivos que levam a intervenções do Judiciário sobre o juízo da Administração. Universidade de Passo Fundo2019-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/959110.5335/rjd.v33i2.9591Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-249Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-2492238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591/114114847Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira dos Santos, MarceloHogemann, Edna Raquel2019-11-19T02:19:19Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/9591Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2019-11-19T02:19:19Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Deference to public choices
Deferência com as escolhas públicas
title Deference to public choices
spellingShingle Deference to public choices
Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo
title_short Deference to public choices
title_full Deference to public choices
title_fullStr Deference to public choices
title_full_unstemmed Deference to public choices
title_sort Deference to public choices
author Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo
author_facet Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo
Hogemann, Edna Raquel
author_role author
author2 Hogemann, Edna Raquel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo
Hogemann, Edna Raquel
description This work aims to identify the limits of the judicial decision on the planned choices of the public administration and to describe the possible consequences of the law 13.655/2018. Starting from the decision of the North American Supreme Court on the Chevron case, specifically with regard to the bases of the judicial deference to the administrative rules, the research focuses its focus on the action of the judiciary on public choices which are justified by the technical circumstances and specificity, affecting the administrative act, according to legislative delimitation and prior planning. Aiming to achieve the objective described above, the dialectical-descriptive methodology is used, which encompasses the survey of the bibliography focused on the theme, as well as the comparison of theoretical concepts that enable the construction of critical descriptions, the understanding of the practical effects of decision-making processes in the administrative environment and detecting the reasons that lead to judicial interventions on the judgment of the Administration.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591
10.5335/rjd.v33i2.9591
url http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591
identifier_str_mv 10.5335/rjd.v33i2.9591
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591/114114847
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-249
Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-249
2238-3212
1413-7038
reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
collection Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com
_version_ 1776750980486922240