Deference to public choices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591 |
Resumo: | This work aims to identify the limits of the judicial decision on the planned choices of the public administration and to describe the possible consequences of the law 13.655/2018. Starting from the decision of the North American Supreme Court on the Chevron case, specifically with regard to the bases of the judicial deference to the administrative rules, the research focuses its focus on the action of the judiciary on public choices which are justified by the technical circumstances and specificity, affecting the administrative act, according to legislative delimitation and prior planning. Aiming to achieve the objective described above, the dialectical-descriptive methodology is used, which encompasses the survey of the bibliography focused on the theme, as well as the comparison of theoretical concepts that enable the construction of critical descriptions, the understanding of the practical effects of decision-making processes in the administrative environment and detecting the reasons that lead to judicial interventions on the judgment of the Administration. |
id |
UPF-4_67e5a95070ae2334044f5a5140575215 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.upf.br:article/9591 |
network_acronym_str |
UPF-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Deference to public choicesDeferência com as escolhas públicasThis work aims to identify the limits of the judicial decision on the planned choices of the public administration and to describe the possible consequences of the law 13.655/2018. Starting from the decision of the North American Supreme Court on the Chevron case, specifically with regard to the bases of the judicial deference to the administrative rules, the research focuses its focus on the action of the judiciary on public choices which are justified by the technical circumstances and specificity, affecting the administrative act, according to legislative delimitation and prior planning. Aiming to achieve the objective described above, the dialectical-descriptive methodology is used, which encompasses the survey of the bibliography focused on the theme, as well as the comparison of theoretical concepts that enable the construction of critical descriptions, the understanding of the practical effects of decision-making processes in the administrative environment and detecting the reasons that lead to judicial interventions on the judgment of the Administration.Este trabalho tem por objetivo identificar os limites decisão judicial sobre as escolhas planejadas da Administração Pública e descrever os possíveis desdobramentos da Lei 13.655/2018. Partindo-se da decisão da Suprema Corte norte americana sobre o caso Chevron, especificamente no que se refere às bases da deferência judicial para as regras administrativas, a pesquisa volta seu foco contra a atuação do Poder Judiciário sobre as escolhas públicas que se justificam pelas circunstâncias e especificidade técnica, afetas ao agir administrativo, conforme delimitação legislativa e planejamento prévio. Visando atingir o objetivo acima descrito, é empregada a metodologia dialético-descritiva que engloba o levantamento da bibliografia voltada para a temática, bem como a comparação de conceitos teóricos que viabilizem a construção de descrições críticas, a compreensão dos efeitos práticos dos processos de tomada de decisão no ambiente administrativo e detectar os motivos que levam a intervenções do Judiciário sobre o juízo da Administração. Universidade de Passo Fundo2019-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/959110.5335/rjd.v33i2.9591Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-249Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-2492238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591/114114847Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira dos Santos, MarceloHogemann, Edna Raquel2019-11-19T02:19:19Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/9591Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2019-11-19T02:19:19Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Deference to public choices Deferência com as escolhas públicas |
title |
Deference to public choices |
spellingShingle |
Deference to public choices Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo |
title_short |
Deference to public choices |
title_full |
Deference to public choices |
title_fullStr |
Deference to public choices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deference to public choices |
title_sort |
Deference to public choices |
author |
Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo Hogemann, Edna Raquel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hogemann, Edna Raquel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira dos Santos, Marcelo Hogemann, Edna Raquel |
description |
This work aims to identify the limits of the judicial decision on the planned choices of the public administration and to describe the possible consequences of the law 13.655/2018. Starting from the decision of the North American Supreme Court on the Chevron case, specifically with regard to the bases of the judicial deference to the administrative rules, the research focuses its focus on the action of the judiciary on public choices which are justified by the technical circumstances and specificity, affecting the administrative act, according to legislative delimitation and prior planning. Aiming to achieve the objective described above, the dialectical-descriptive methodology is used, which encompasses the survey of the bibliography focused on the theme, as well as the comparison of theoretical concepts that enable the construction of critical descriptions, the understanding of the practical effects of decision-making processes in the administrative environment and detecting the reasons that lead to judicial interventions on the judgment of the Administration. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591 10.5335/rjd.v33i2.9591 |
url |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5335/rjd.v33i2.9591 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9591/114114847 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Passo Fundo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-249 Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 2 (2019): Justiça do Direito; 222-249 2238-3212 1413-7038 reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) instacron:UPF |
instname_str |
Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
instacron_str |
UPF |
institution |
UPF |
reponame_str |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
collection |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1776750980486922240 |