Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kokke, Marcelo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Rezende, Elcio Nacur
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9346
Resumo: The protection of environmental goods can be carried out by several legal areas. The environmental protection is detachable in the civil area, in order to repair damages, beside punitive state activities, by means of sanctioning and criminal law. Although ius puniendi can be made effective both by criminal rules and administrative sanctioning rules, there are significant differences. The differences are linked to typicality, culpability and proof requirements in order to impose legal penalties. From the methodology of the dialogue of sources, the paper analyzes the legal areas integration, in special, the relationship between criminal and administrative areas. For comparative purposes, the paper proposes analyzes of judgments from Brazilian, Colombian and Spanish Courts. The development allows to conclude that the elements of criminal persecution, included cases without guilty verdict, can be used in the environmental administrative sanction, such as in the case of Brazilian plea agreement.
id UPF-4_8bf1a19e4251fe5b08fe0d1c93c96cf6
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.upf.br:article/9346
network_acronym_str UPF-4
network_name_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal CulpabilityProcesso Sancionador Ambiental e a Culpabilidade PenalThe protection of environmental goods can be carried out by several legal areas. The environmental protection is detachable in the civil area, in order to repair damages, beside punitive state activities, by means of sanctioning and criminal law. Although ius puniendi can be made effective both by criminal rules and administrative sanctioning rules, there are significant differences. The differences are linked to typicality, culpability and proof requirements in order to impose legal penalties. From the methodology of the dialogue of sources, the paper analyzes the legal areas integration, in special, the relationship between criminal and administrative areas. For comparative purposes, the paper proposes analyzes of judgments from Brazilian, Colombian and Spanish Courts. The development allows to conclude that the elements of criminal persecution, included cases without guilty verdict, can be used in the environmental administrative sanction, such as in the case of Brazilian plea agreement. A proteção dos bens ambientais pode ser realizada por diversos ramos jurídicos. Destacam-se a proteção ambiental na esfera cível, voltada para a reparação do dano, e as atuações estatais punitivas, por meio do direito sancionador e do direito penal. Embora o ius puniendi seja efetivado tanto por normas penais quanto por normas de direito administrativo sancionador, há profundas diferenças entre elas. As diferenças são ligadas à tipicidade, à culpabilidade e às exigências de provas para a imposição de penalidades. A partir do método do diálogo das fontes, o artigo analisa a integração entre as esferas, principalmente entre as esferas penal e administrativa. Para fins comparativos, o trabalho propõe uma análise de decisões de tribunais brasileiro, colombiano e espanhol. O desenvolvimento permite concluir que elementos da apuração penal, mesmo sem sentença condenatória, podem ser suporte para a aplicação de sanção administrativa ambiental, como ocorre no instituto da transação penal.Universidade de Passo Fundo2019-06-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/934610.5335/rjd.v33i1.9346Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 1 (2019); 37-77Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 1 (2019); 37-772238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9346/114114646Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKokke, MarceloRezende, Elcio Nacur2019-06-07T19:02:29Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/9346Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2019-06-07T19:02:29Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
Processo Sancionador Ambiental e a Culpabilidade Penal
title Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
spellingShingle Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
Kokke, Marcelo
title_short Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
title_full Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
title_fullStr Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
title_sort Environmental Sanctioning Process and Criminal Culpability
author Kokke, Marcelo
author_facet Kokke, Marcelo
Rezende, Elcio Nacur
author_role author
author2 Rezende, Elcio Nacur
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kokke, Marcelo
Rezende, Elcio Nacur
description The protection of environmental goods can be carried out by several legal areas. The environmental protection is detachable in the civil area, in order to repair damages, beside punitive state activities, by means of sanctioning and criminal law. Although ius puniendi can be made effective both by criminal rules and administrative sanctioning rules, there are significant differences. The differences are linked to typicality, culpability and proof requirements in order to impose legal penalties. From the methodology of the dialogue of sources, the paper analyzes the legal areas integration, in special, the relationship between criminal and administrative areas. For comparative purposes, the paper proposes analyzes of judgments from Brazilian, Colombian and Spanish Courts. The development allows to conclude that the elements of criminal persecution, included cases without guilty verdict, can be used in the environmental administrative sanction, such as in the case of Brazilian plea agreement.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9346
10.5335/rjd.v33i1.9346
url http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9346
identifier_str_mv 10.5335/rjd.v33i1.9346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/9346/114114646
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 33 n. 1 (2019); 37-77
Law of Justice Journal; Vol 33 No 1 (2019); 37-77
2238-3212
1413-7038
reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
collection Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com
_version_ 1776750980473290752

Registros relacionados