The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
Texto Completo: http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/7862
Resumo: One of the blind spots of the traditional rationale in the Brazilian Supreme Court judicial authority is the description of the function and discursive use of their own impartiality. Based upon data and discourses related to how the Court ruled regarding its judges performance, this article aims to observe the singular paradoxical relationship between law and politics reflected in the STF decisions. Therefore, this study adopted a methodological approach with its own focus of quantitative research. In order to do so, we scrutinized all decisions on procedures questioning a supposed partiality of ministers. We highlighted the deliberative criteria, the power agenda of the Presidency of the Court and, in particular, a confidence-building capacity for the impartial performance of jurisdiction. Last but not least, a clear diagnosis presented on the visibility deficit related to the judicial impartiality at the Court and the impact born from legitimated responses during constitutional adjudication.
id UPF-4_f505709c7156c35fa26e0194b0a7dd1c
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.upf.br:article/7862
network_acronym_str UPF-4
network_name_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme CourtA Imparcialidade Autoavaliada: as arguições de impedimento e suspeição no Supremo Tribunal FederalOne of the blind spots of the traditional rationale in the Brazilian Supreme Court judicial authority is the description of the function and discursive use of their own impartiality. Based upon data and discourses related to how the Court ruled regarding its judges performance, this article aims to observe the singular paradoxical relationship between law and politics reflected in the STF decisions. Therefore, this study adopted a methodological approach with its own focus of quantitative research. In order to do so, we scrutinized all decisions on procedures questioning a supposed partiality of ministers. We highlighted the deliberative criteria, the power agenda of the Presidency of the Court and, in particular, a confidence-building capacity for the impartial performance of jurisdiction. Last but not least, a clear diagnosis presented on the visibility deficit related to the judicial impartiality at the Court and the impact born from legitimated responses during constitutional adjudication.Um dos pontos cegos da tradicional justificativa da autoridade jurisdicional do Supremo Tribunal Federal está na descrição da função e do uso discursivo da sua própria imparcialidade. A partir da aproximação aos dados e discursos relativos à forma como a Corte decide sobre as condições da atuação de seus ministros, este artigo procura preencher essa lacuna ao observar o modo peculiar da articulação paradoxal entre o direito e política refletida no discurso decisório do STF. Para tanto, o trabalho adotou uma abordagem metodológica com enfoque próprio de pesquisa quantitativa. Foram levantadas todas as decisões que encerram os incidentes de suspeição e impedimento no Tribunal, destacando os critérios deliberativos, o poder de agenda da Presidência da Corte e, em especial, a capacidade de reforço da confiança no desempenho imparcial da jurisdição. Por fim, procura-se apresentar um diagnóstico claro do déficit de visibilidade da imparcialidade dos ministros e o seu impacto para a legitimação das respostas da Corte no exercício da jurisdição constitucional.Universidade de Passo Fundo2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/786210.5335/rjd.v35i2.7862Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 35 n. 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 288-317Law of Justice Journal; Vol 35 No 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 288-3172238-32121413-7038reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFporhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/7862/114116190Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direitohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de2021-11-04T20:39:47Zoai:seer.upf.br:article/7862Revistahttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjdPUBhttp://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/oairevistajusticadodireito@gmail.com2238-32121413-7038opendoar:2021-11-04T20:39:47Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
A Imparcialidade Autoavaliada: as arguições de impedimento e suspeição no Supremo Tribunal Federal
title The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
spellingShingle The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de
title_short The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
title_full The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
title_fullStr The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
title_full_unstemmed The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
title_sort The impartiality self-assessed: the allegations of impediment and suspicion in Brazilian Supreme Court
author Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de
author_facet Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Alexandre Douglas Zaidan de
description One of the blind spots of the traditional rationale in the Brazilian Supreme Court judicial authority is the description of the function and discursive use of their own impartiality. Based upon data and discourses related to how the Court ruled regarding its judges performance, this article aims to observe the singular paradoxical relationship between law and politics reflected in the STF decisions. Therefore, this study adopted a methodological approach with its own focus of quantitative research. In order to do so, we scrutinized all decisions on procedures questioning a supposed partiality of ministers. We highlighted the deliberative criteria, the power agenda of the Presidency of the Court and, in particular, a confidence-building capacity for the impartial performance of jurisdiction. Last but not least, a clear diagnosis presented on the visibility deficit related to the judicial impartiality at the Court and the impact born from legitimated responses during constitutional adjudication.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/7862
10.5335/rjd.v35i2.7862
url http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/7862
identifier_str_mv 10.5335/rjd.v35i2.7862
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://seer.upf.br/index.php/rjd/article/view/7862/114116190
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Justiça do Direito
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito; v. 35 n. 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 288-317
Law of Justice Journal; Vol 35 No 2 (2021): Justiça do Direito; 288-317
2238-3212
1413-7038
reponame:Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
collection Revista Justiça do Direito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Justiça do Direito (Online) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistajusticadodireito@gmail.com
_version_ 1776750980416667648

Registros relacionados