Monstr.: entre monstros e aparelhos

• Autor(a) principal: Candiotto, Bruno Ferres
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
• Texto Completo: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/24801
• topic: fotografia; manipulação; monstruosidade; interdisciplinaridade; photography; manipulation; monstrosity; interdisciplinarity; CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::ARTES::FOTOGRAFIA

MONSTR. BETWEEN MONSTERS AND APPARATUS is a theoretical and practical, literary, essayistic and imagery experiment based on applying an artistic operator: monstr. . Through this operator the text of the thesis was constructed proposing a self-questioning of the principles that govern the form of a dissertation in which images and words interacts without hierarchy. What emerges in the dissertation as "monstr." refers to the mode of appointing the creation process, while this process happens considering the strangeness of the act of creation, when creation is actually an interdiction of the creation itself. A radical investment in interdisciplinary dissertation led to the effect of this methodological application. Important authors of the theoretical scenario were used in the process we call "monstrification". Among them fundamentally i quote from Vilém Flusser. He and others served not as authority, but as partners who enter into a dialogue under the proposed methodology. A glossary was built to explain the terms of the text. This glossary aims at bringing the reader closer of the epistemology "monstr." which was used throughout the dissertation extending the theoretical horizons of the reader. The images produced by the "manipulation" of photographs, aims at not to illustrate the text, but to enable a dialogue with it. It suggests a dive in the deep water; a sensory and abysmal depths. All photographs displayed here are nothing more than self-portraits produced by the artistic operator, which exposes them through an admittedly nonlinear aesthetic, emphasizing hybrid characteristics and unusual "plurality" of himself. Actually these photographs have been manipulated and were set to "manipulate" and to be manipulated, causing reflections not only about the "visual" but also about the "sensory" and the myriad of possibilities that this dialectic allows.