Justiça itinerante: política judicial de acesso à justiça e cidadania

• Autor(a) principal: Resende, Adêilda Coelho de
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do Mackenzie
• Texto Completo: http://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/23074
• topic: acesso à justiça; políticas públicas judiciárias; cidadania; justiça itinerante; access to justice; judicial public policy; citizenship; justice itinerant; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

The democratization of Justice in Brazil can be defined as a series of reform measures that involve changes in substantive law and procedural law. The reform of the judiciary has been established gradually and EC 45/2004 is a symbol of this process. Reform that builds a new profile of access to justice in the country by the discourse of administer Justice (National Council of Justice) and the measures agreed in Compacts Republicans. Reforms are needed to better jurisdictional provision and access to justice. The conduction process is under construction and are an effective public policies Judicial Access to Justice. In this process there is a meeting of the National Judicial Administration programs with access to justice that were already established in the Courts of Justice, before the EC 45/2004. Dynamic programs such as Justice Itinerant seeking access to a legal right, and, as an experiential reality constitute legal instrument of public policy. Thinking judicial policy in the country necessarily to reveal structural and regulatory aspects of the experiential meaning of public policy and judicial policy. And this means, observing the phenomena of court Legalization and Control of Public Policies for interdisciplinary Law and Political Science. The country has undeniably socio-economic contradictions that influence the way people grasp the meaning of citizenship for the proper exercise of their rights, by the mechanism of access to justice. For this aspect of access to justice axiological dimensions will be differentiated, so silent that access reform by judicial public policy implementation is a topic that should be studied and scientifically observed to improving access to justice.