Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077 |
Resumo: | Studies have been conducted in order to demonstrate the benefits of the use of irrigation in the annual yield of forage cactus. But they still need improvement, as soon as they do not address the need for water culture, and the less different clones. The purpose of this proposal was to evaluate the adoption of different water management in the plantation system of forage cactus clones in semi-arid environment. The experiment was conducted in the city of Serra Talhada-PE (2012/2014), with cactus pear clones Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), Submitted to three water schemes: rainfed (S), irrigation without coverage (ISC) and irrigation with mulch on the soil (ICC). The experiment was arranged in randomized block design in a split plot arrangement with three replications. At the time of harvest were recorded biometric data of the plant and cladodes. The crop yield was determined in fresh and dry base in tonnes per hectare. From these data were calculated water use efficiency indicators (EUA), economic productivity and economic viability of the adoption of different water management. For this, the total production costs for implementation and maintenance of the irrigation system were calculated, driving culture, gross and net profitability, and benefit / cost ratio. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance when necessary compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. There was no interaction among the factors water regimes and clones. On the other hand, the yield of green matter (MV) was no significant difference (p> 0.05) with the isolated effect of clones and water regimes, highlighting, in that order, the OEM and the ICC. In the dry matter (MS) there was difference only for water systems, where the ICC showed better performance in relation to other treatments. Water efficiency was higher for o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), followed by IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) and MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). In terms of economic analysis, the total cost of production of irrigated forage cactus was R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considering the fate of forages, OEM clone showed the average net income of R$ 4.745,49 and the benefit / cost ratio of 0,57, indicating no economic viability. Already considering the sale of cladodes as "seed" the Miúda showed higher values of net revenues and cost/benefit, averaging R$ 57.902,55 and 6,95 respectively, that is, for every R$ 1,00 investment in irrigated forage palm production system for an average return of R$ 6,95. Thus it is concluded that (i) the OEM clone with the irrigation events showed a good growth performance, particularly for the sale of fodder, and MIU for the sale of cladodes intended for "seed". (ii) the combination of irrigation with the use of mulch contributed to the production increase of forage cactus, but did not minimize the disparity in productivity Nopalea genre clones in relation to the genres Opuntia. |
id |
URPE_2e34432438048ccbf4e34c55f7ac68e2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/8077 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SILVA, Thieres George Freire daSTEIDLE NETO, Antônio JoséSILVA, Maria da ConceiçãoSOUZA, Luciana Sandra Bastos deLEITE, Mauricio Luiz de Mello VieiraTEIXEIRA, Vicente Imbroisihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5013608631745971HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto2019-06-03T13:00:48Z2016-07-27HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto. Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos. 2016. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077Studies have been conducted in order to demonstrate the benefits of the use of irrigation in the annual yield of forage cactus. But they still need improvement, as soon as they do not address the need for water culture, and the less different clones. The purpose of this proposal was to evaluate the adoption of different water management in the plantation system of forage cactus clones in semi-arid environment. The experiment was conducted in the city of Serra Talhada-PE (2012/2014), with cactus pear clones Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), Submitted to three water schemes: rainfed (S), irrigation without coverage (ISC) and irrigation with mulch on the soil (ICC). The experiment was arranged in randomized block design in a split plot arrangement with three replications. At the time of harvest were recorded biometric data of the plant and cladodes. The crop yield was determined in fresh and dry base in tonnes per hectare. From these data were calculated water use efficiency indicators (EUA), economic productivity and economic viability of the adoption of different water management. For this, the total production costs for implementation and maintenance of the irrigation system were calculated, driving culture, gross and net profitability, and benefit / cost ratio. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance when necessary compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. There was no interaction among the factors water regimes and clones. On the other hand, the yield of green matter (MV) was no significant difference (p> 0.05) with the isolated effect of clones and water regimes, highlighting, in that order, the OEM and the ICC. In the dry matter (MS) there was difference only for water systems, where the ICC showed better performance in relation to other treatments. Water efficiency was higher for o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), followed by IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) and MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). In terms of economic analysis, the total cost of production of irrigated forage cactus was R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considering the fate of forages, OEM clone showed the average net income of R$ 4.745,49 and the benefit / cost ratio of 0,57, indicating no economic viability. Already considering the sale of cladodes as "seed" the Miúda showed higher values of net revenues and cost/benefit, averaging R$ 57.902,55 and 6,95 respectively, that is, for every R$ 1,00 investment in irrigated forage palm production system for an average return of R$ 6,95. Thus it is concluded that (i) the OEM clone with the irrigation events showed a good growth performance, particularly for the sale of fodder, and MIU for the sale of cladodes intended for "seed". (ii) the combination of irrigation with the use of mulch contributed to the production increase of forage cactus, but did not minimize the disparity in productivity Nopalea genre clones in relation to the genres Opuntia.Estudos tem sido realizados com intuito de demonstrar os benefícios do uso da irrigação no rendimento anual da palma forrageira. Mas, os mesmos ainda precisam de aperfeiçoamento, logo que não contemplam a necessidade de água da cultura, e quanto menos diferentes clones. O objetivo foi avaliar a adoção do manejo hídrico diferenciado no sistema de plantio de clones de palma forrageira em ambiente Semiárido. O experimento foi conduzido no município de Serra Talhada-PE entre os anos de 2012 e 2014, com clones de palma forrageira Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), submetidos a três regimes hídricos: sequeiro (S), irrigação sem cobertura (ISC) e irrigação com cobertura morta sobre o solo (ICC). O experimento foi disposto em delineamento em blocos ao acaso, em arranjo de parcelas subdivididas com três repetições. Na ocasião da colheita foram registrados os dados biométricos da planta e dos cladódios. O rendimento da cultura foi determinado em base fresca e seca, em toneladas por hectare. A partir desses dados foram calculados os indicadores de eficiência do uso da água (EUA), produtividade econômica e a viabilidade econômica da adoção dos manejos hídricos diferenciados. Para isso, foram calculados os custos totais de produção para implantação e manutenção do sistema de irrigação, condução da cultura, lucratividade bruta e líquida, e relação benefício/custo. Os dados experimentais foram submetidos à análise de variância, quando necessário, as médias comparadas pelo teste Tukey ao nível de 5% de probabilidade. Não houve interação entre os fatores regime hídrico e clone. Por outro lado, no rendimento de matéria verde (MV) houve diferença significativa (p>0,05) com o efeito isolado dos clones e dos regimes hídricos, destacando-se, nessa ordem, a OEM e o ICC. Na matéria seca (MS) apresentou diferença apenas entre os regimes hídricos, sendo o ICC aquele que apresentou melhor desempenho. A eficiência no uso da água foi maior para o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), seguida da IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) e da MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). Em termos de análise econômica, o custo total de produção da palma forrageira irrigada foi de R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considerando-se o destino para forragem, o clone OEM apresentou a receita líquida média de R$ 4.745,49 e a relação benefício/custo de 0,57, indicando a não viabilidade econômica no ciclo de dois anos. Já considerando a venda dos cladódios como “semente”, a Miúda apresentou valores superiores de receita líquida e benefício/custo, com média de R$ 57.902,55 e 6,95, respectivamente, ou seja, para cada R$ 1,00 de investimento no sistema de produção de palma forrageira irrigada há um retorno médio de R$ 6,95 logo após a primeira colheita. Desta forma, conclui-se que, (i) o clone OEM com os eventos de irrigação apresentou um bom desempenho produtivo, principalmente para venda de forragem, e a MIU para a venda dos cladódios destinados para “semente”. (ii) a associação da irrigação com o uso de cobertura morta contribuiu com o incremento produtivo da palma forrageira, porém não minimizou a disparidade na produtividade dos clones do gênero Nopalea em relação ao do gênero Opuntia.Submitted by Mario BC (mario@bc.ufrpe.br) on 2019-06-03T13:00:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Leandro Calixto Henriques.pdf: 1394050 bytes, checksum: e3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-06-03T13:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leandro Calixto Henriques.pdf: 1394050 bytes, checksum: e3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-27application/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Produção VegetalUFRPEBrasilUnidade Acadêmica de Serra TalhadaPalma forrageiraIrrigaçãoSemiáridoFITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETALDesempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricosPerformance bioeconomic of forage cactus clones under different water managementsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1747323715939935130600600600-69689050375526628842615607299470131967info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALLeandro Calixto Henriques.pdfLeandro Calixto Henriques.pdfapplication/pdf1394050http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/2/Leandro+Calixto+Henriques.pdfe3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/80772019-06-03 10:00:48.395oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:36:29.873098Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Performance bioeconomic of forage cactus clones under different water managements |
title |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
spellingShingle |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto Palma forrageira Irrigação Semiárido FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL |
title_short |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
title_full |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
title_fullStr |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
title_sort |
Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos |
author |
HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto |
author_facet |
HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Thieres George Freire da |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
STEIDLE NETO, Antônio José |
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv |
SILVA, Maria da Conceição |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
SOUZA, Luciana Sandra Bastos de |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
LEITE, Mauricio Luiz de Mello Vieira |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
TEIXEIRA, Vicente Imbroisi |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5013608631745971 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto |
contributor_str_mv |
SILVA, Thieres George Freire da STEIDLE NETO, Antônio José SILVA, Maria da Conceição SOUZA, Luciana Sandra Bastos de LEITE, Mauricio Luiz de Mello Vieira TEIXEIRA, Vicente Imbroisi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Palma forrageira Irrigação Semiárido |
topic |
Palma forrageira Irrigação Semiárido FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL |
description |
Studies have been conducted in order to demonstrate the benefits of the use of irrigation in the annual yield of forage cactus. But they still need improvement, as soon as they do not address the need for water culture, and the less different clones. The purpose of this proposal was to evaluate the adoption of different water management in the plantation system of forage cactus clones in semi-arid environment. The experiment was conducted in the city of Serra Talhada-PE (2012/2014), with cactus pear clones Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), Submitted to three water schemes: rainfed (S), irrigation without coverage (ISC) and irrigation with mulch on the soil (ICC). The experiment was arranged in randomized block design in a split plot arrangement with three replications. At the time of harvest were recorded biometric data of the plant and cladodes. The crop yield was determined in fresh and dry base in tonnes per hectare. From these data were calculated water use efficiency indicators (EUA), economic productivity and economic viability of the adoption of different water management. For this, the total production costs for implementation and maintenance of the irrigation system were calculated, driving culture, gross and net profitability, and benefit / cost ratio. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance when necessary compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. There was no interaction among the factors water regimes and clones. On the other hand, the yield of green matter (MV) was no significant difference (p> 0.05) with the isolated effect of clones and water regimes, highlighting, in that order, the OEM and the ICC. In the dry matter (MS) there was difference only for water systems, where the ICC showed better performance in relation to other treatments. Water efficiency was higher for o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), followed by IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) and MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). In terms of economic analysis, the total cost of production of irrigated forage cactus was R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considering the fate of forages, OEM clone showed the average net income of R$ 4.745,49 and the benefit / cost ratio of 0,57, indicating no economic viability. Already considering the sale of cladodes as "seed" the Miúda showed higher values of net revenues and cost/benefit, averaging R$ 57.902,55 and 6,95 respectively, that is, for every R$ 1,00 investment in irrigated forage palm production system for an average return of R$ 6,95. Thus it is concluded that (i) the OEM clone with the irrigation events showed a good growth performance, particularly for the sale of fodder, and MIU for the sale of cladodes intended for "seed". (ii) the combination of irrigation with the use of mulch contributed to the production increase of forage cactus, but did not minimize the disparity in productivity Nopalea genre clones in relation to the genres Opuntia. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-27 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-03T13:00:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto. Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos. 2016. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077 |
identifier_str_mv |
HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto. Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos. 2016. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-1747323715939935130 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6968905037552662884 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
2615607299470131967 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/2/Leandro+Calixto+Henriques.pdf http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102259236732928 |