Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
Texto Completo: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077
Resumo: Studies have been conducted in order to demonstrate the benefits of the use of irrigation in the annual yield of forage cactus. But they still need improvement, as soon as they do not address the need for water culture, and the less different clones. The purpose of this proposal was to evaluate the adoption of different water management in the plantation system of forage cactus clones in semi-arid environment. The experiment was conducted in the city of Serra Talhada-PE (2012/2014), with cactus pear clones Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), Submitted to three water schemes: rainfed (S), irrigation without coverage (ISC) and irrigation with mulch on the soil (ICC). The experiment was arranged in randomized block design in a split plot arrangement with three replications. At the time of harvest were recorded biometric data of the plant and cladodes. The crop yield was determined in fresh and dry base in tonnes per hectare. From these data were calculated water use efficiency indicators (EUA), economic productivity and economic viability of the adoption of different water management. For this, the total production costs for implementation and maintenance of the irrigation system were calculated, driving culture, gross and net profitability, and benefit / cost ratio. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance when necessary compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. There was no interaction among the factors water regimes and clones. On the other hand, the yield of green matter (MV) was no significant difference (p> 0.05) with the isolated effect of clones and water regimes, highlighting, in that order, the OEM and the ICC. In the dry matter (MS) there was difference only for water systems, where the ICC showed better performance in relation to other treatments. Water efficiency was higher for o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), followed by IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) and MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). In terms of economic analysis, the total cost of production of irrigated forage cactus was R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considering the fate of forages, OEM clone showed the average net income of R$ 4.745,49 and the benefit / cost ratio of 0,57, indicating no economic viability. Already considering the sale of cladodes as "seed" the Miúda showed higher values of net revenues and cost/benefit, averaging R$ 57.902,55 and 6,95 respectively, that is, for every R$ 1,00 investment in irrigated forage palm production system for an average return of R$ 6,95. Thus it is concluded that (i) the OEM clone with the irrigation events showed a good growth performance, particularly for the sale of fodder, and MIU for the sale of cladodes intended for "seed". (ii) the combination of irrigation with the use of mulch contributed to the production increase of forage cactus, but did not minimize the disparity in productivity Nopalea genre clones in relation to the genres Opuntia.
id URPE_2e34432438048ccbf4e34c55f7ac68e2
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/8077
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling SILVA, Thieres George Freire daSTEIDLE NETO, Antônio JoséSILVA, Maria da ConceiçãoSOUZA, Luciana Sandra Bastos deLEITE, Mauricio Luiz de Mello VieiraTEIXEIRA, Vicente Imbroisihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5013608631745971HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto2019-06-03T13:00:48Z2016-07-27HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto. Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos. 2016. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077Studies have been conducted in order to demonstrate the benefits of the use of irrigation in the annual yield of forage cactus. But they still need improvement, as soon as they do not address the need for water culture, and the less different clones. The purpose of this proposal was to evaluate the adoption of different water management in the plantation system of forage cactus clones in semi-arid environment. The experiment was conducted in the city of Serra Talhada-PE (2012/2014), with cactus pear clones Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), Submitted to three water schemes: rainfed (S), irrigation without coverage (ISC) and irrigation with mulch on the soil (ICC). The experiment was arranged in randomized block design in a split plot arrangement with three replications. At the time of harvest were recorded biometric data of the plant and cladodes. The crop yield was determined in fresh and dry base in tonnes per hectare. From these data were calculated water use efficiency indicators (EUA), economic productivity and economic viability of the adoption of different water management. For this, the total production costs for implementation and maintenance of the irrigation system were calculated, driving culture, gross and net profitability, and benefit / cost ratio. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance when necessary compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. There was no interaction among the factors water regimes and clones. On the other hand, the yield of green matter (MV) was no significant difference (p> 0.05) with the isolated effect of clones and water regimes, highlighting, in that order, the OEM and the ICC. In the dry matter (MS) there was difference only for water systems, where the ICC showed better performance in relation to other treatments. Water efficiency was higher for o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), followed by IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) and MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). In terms of economic analysis, the total cost of production of irrigated forage cactus was R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considering the fate of forages, OEM clone showed the average net income of R$ 4.745,49 and the benefit / cost ratio of 0,57, indicating no economic viability. Already considering the sale of cladodes as "seed" the Miúda showed higher values of net revenues and cost/benefit, averaging R$ 57.902,55 and 6,95 respectively, that is, for every R$ 1,00 investment in irrigated forage palm production system for an average return of R$ 6,95. Thus it is concluded that (i) the OEM clone with the irrigation events showed a good growth performance, particularly for the sale of fodder, and MIU for the sale of cladodes intended for "seed". (ii) the combination of irrigation with the use of mulch contributed to the production increase of forage cactus, but did not minimize the disparity in productivity Nopalea genre clones in relation to the genres Opuntia.Estudos tem sido realizados com intuito de demonstrar os benefícios do uso da irrigação no rendimento anual da palma forrageira. Mas, os mesmos ainda precisam de aperfeiçoamento, logo que não contemplam a necessidade de água da cultura, e quanto menos diferentes clones. O objetivo foi avaliar a adoção do manejo hídrico diferenciado no sistema de plantio de clones de palma forrageira em ambiente Semiárido. O experimento foi conduzido no município de Serra Talhada-PE entre os anos de 2012 e 2014, com clones de palma forrageira Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), submetidos a três regimes hídricos: sequeiro (S), irrigação sem cobertura (ISC) e irrigação com cobertura morta sobre o solo (ICC). O experimento foi disposto em delineamento em blocos ao acaso, em arranjo de parcelas subdivididas com três repetições. Na ocasião da colheita foram registrados os dados biométricos da planta e dos cladódios. O rendimento da cultura foi determinado em base fresca e seca, em toneladas por hectare. A partir desses dados foram calculados os indicadores de eficiência do uso da água (EUA), produtividade econômica e a viabilidade econômica da adoção dos manejos hídricos diferenciados. Para isso, foram calculados os custos totais de produção para implantação e manutenção do sistema de irrigação, condução da cultura, lucratividade bruta e líquida, e relação benefício/custo. Os dados experimentais foram submetidos à análise de variância, quando necessário, as médias comparadas pelo teste Tukey ao nível de 5% de probabilidade. Não houve interação entre os fatores regime hídrico e clone. Por outro lado, no rendimento de matéria verde (MV) houve diferença significativa (p>0,05) com o efeito isolado dos clones e dos regimes hídricos, destacando-se, nessa ordem, a OEM e o ICC. Na matéria seca (MS) apresentou diferença apenas entre os regimes hídricos, sendo o ICC aquele que apresentou melhor desempenho. A eficiência no uso da água foi maior para o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), seguida da IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) e da MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). Em termos de análise econômica, o custo total de produção da palma forrageira irrigada foi de R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considerando-se o destino para forragem, o clone OEM apresentou a receita líquida média de R$ 4.745,49 e a relação benefício/custo de 0,57, indicando a não viabilidade econômica no ciclo de dois anos. Já considerando a venda dos cladódios como “semente”, a Miúda apresentou valores superiores de receita líquida e benefício/custo, com média de R$ 57.902,55 e 6,95, respectivamente, ou seja, para cada R$ 1,00 de investimento no sistema de produção de palma forrageira irrigada há um retorno médio de R$ 6,95 logo após a primeira colheita. Desta forma, conclui-se que, (i) o clone OEM com os eventos de irrigação apresentou um bom desempenho produtivo, principalmente para venda de forragem, e a MIU para a venda dos cladódios destinados para “semente”. (ii) a associação da irrigação com o uso de cobertura morta contribuiu com o incremento produtivo da palma forrageira, porém não minimizou a disparidade na produtividade dos clones do gênero Nopalea em relação ao do gênero Opuntia.Submitted by Mario BC (mario@bc.ufrpe.br) on 2019-06-03T13:00:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Leandro Calixto Henriques.pdf: 1394050 bytes, checksum: e3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-06-03T13:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leandro Calixto Henriques.pdf: 1394050 bytes, checksum: e3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-27application/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Produção VegetalUFRPEBrasilUnidade Acadêmica de Serra TalhadaPalma forrageiraIrrigaçãoSemiáridoFITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETALDesempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricosPerformance bioeconomic of forage cactus clones under different water managementsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-1747323715939935130600600600-69689050375526628842615607299470131967info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALLeandro Calixto Henriques.pdfLeandro Calixto Henriques.pdfapplication/pdf1394050http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/2/Leandro+Calixto+Henriques.pdfe3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/80772019-06-03 10:00:48.395oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:36:29.873098Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Performance bioeconomic of forage cactus clones under different water managements
title Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
spellingShingle Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto
Palma forrageira
Irrigação
Semiárido
FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL
title_short Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
title_full Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
title_fullStr Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
title_full_unstemmed Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
title_sort Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos
author HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto
author_facet HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv SILVA, Thieres George Freire da
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv STEIDLE NETO, Antônio José
dc.contributor.advisor-co2.fl_str_mv SILVA, Maria da Conceição
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv SOUZA, Luciana Sandra Bastos de
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv LEITE, Mauricio Luiz de Mello Vieira
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv TEIXEIRA, Vicente Imbroisi
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5013608631745971
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto
contributor_str_mv SILVA, Thieres George Freire da
STEIDLE NETO, Antônio José
SILVA, Maria da Conceição
SOUZA, Luciana Sandra Bastos de
LEITE, Mauricio Luiz de Mello Vieira
TEIXEIRA, Vicente Imbroisi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Palma forrageira
Irrigação
Semiárido
topic Palma forrageira
Irrigação
Semiárido
FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv FITOTECNIA::MELHORAMENTO VEGETAL
description Studies have been conducted in order to demonstrate the benefits of the use of irrigation in the annual yield of forage cactus. But they still need improvement, as soon as they do not address the need for water culture, and the less different clones. The purpose of this proposal was to evaluate the adoption of different water management in the plantation system of forage cactus clones in semi-arid environment. The experiment was conducted in the city of Serra Talhada-PE (2012/2014), with cactus pear clones Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - OEM (Opuntia stricta), IPA Sertânia - IPA e Miúda - MIU (Nopalea cochenillífera), Submitted to three water schemes: rainfed (S), irrigation without coverage (ISC) and irrigation with mulch on the soil (ICC). The experiment was arranged in randomized block design in a split plot arrangement with three replications. At the time of harvest were recorded biometric data of the plant and cladodes. The crop yield was determined in fresh and dry base in tonnes per hectare. From these data were calculated water use efficiency indicators (EUA), economic productivity and economic viability of the adoption of different water management. For this, the total production costs for implementation and maintenance of the irrigation system were calculated, driving culture, gross and net profitability, and benefit / cost ratio. The experimental data were subjected to analysis of variance when necessary compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. There was no interaction among the factors water regimes and clones. On the other hand, the yield of green matter (MV) was no significant difference (p> 0.05) with the isolated effect of clones and water regimes, highlighting, in that order, the OEM and the ICC. In the dry matter (MS) there was difference only for water systems, where the ICC showed better performance in relation to other treatments. Water efficiency was higher for o OEM (EUA~15,48 kg MS ha-1 mm-1), followed by IPA (EUA~9,64 kg MS ha-1 mm-1) and MIU (EUA~7,83 kg MS ha-1 mm-1). In terms of economic analysis, the total cost of production of irrigated forage cactus was R$ 8.442,46 ha-1. Considering the fate of forages, OEM clone showed the average net income of R$ 4.745,49 and the benefit / cost ratio of 0,57, indicating no economic viability. Already considering the sale of cladodes as "seed" the Miúda showed higher values of net revenues and cost/benefit, averaging R$ 57.902,55 and 6,95 respectively, that is, for every R$ 1,00 investment in irrigated forage palm production system for an average return of R$ 6,95. Thus it is concluded that (i) the OEM clone with the irrigation events showed a good growth performance, particularly for the sale of fodder, and MIU for the sale of cladodes intended for "seed". (ii) the combination of irrigation with the use of mulch contributed to the production increase of forage cactus, but did not minimize the disparity in productivity Nopalea genre clones in relation to the genres Opuntia.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016-07-27
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-06-03T13:00:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto. Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos. 2016. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077
identifier_str_mv HENRIQUES, Leandro Calixto. Desempenho bioeconômico de clones de palma forrageira sob diferentes manejos hídricos. 2016. 84 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Serra Talhada.
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8077
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -1747323715939935130
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6968905037552662884
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 2615607299470131967
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Produção Vegetal
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/2/Leandro+Calixto+Henriques.pdf
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8077/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e3e34e270d5402d981dbb53525367618
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1810102259236732928