Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8351 |
Resumo: | Acting in the very stable learning ecosystem of classrooms, there was no need in the past to reflect on the role of teachers as designers of their activities, in fact teachers saw themselves predominantly as carriers and transmitters of the values and knowledge of which our cultures are made. However, things have changed and the current consensus seems to be that teachers can only face these challenges if they adopt the mindset of a designer if they begin to see themselves as designers of learning experiences. But what is perpetuated without the professional teacher realizes, the importance of this reflexive work, what prevents a new vision from being installed in the reflection of their practices, a competence that is clearly important for the exercise of their profession. For this, a new modus operandi is necessary so that this professional can seek a critical and reflexive approach on educational phenomenon. In recent years there has been the emergence and popularization of a design chain called Design Thinking (BROWN, 2010). This chain synthesizes guidelines on designing and solving problems and presents the design thinking as a tool for any professional. Design thinking has been applied in basic education in several countries of the world, including in Brazil to collaborate in the search for solutions to various educational problems. However, many of these practices are documented only with empirical experiential character and are presented on websites and social networks. Our focus is the premises of Design Thinking and the way in which teachers take ownership of them, analyzing from the perspective of the abductive logic present in this approach to the planning of teaching sequences learning in a formative process following the guidelines of the phases of Design Thinking . The delimitation of the study and the research problem was defined by the following question: Can teachers act as designers in the process of planning teaching and learning sequences based on the principles and tools of the Design Thinking approach? We seek to understand how teachers take ownership of the premises and principles of Design Thinking in a training space and to plan teaching and learning sequences; to relate the abductive operators present in the structuring of the proposal of Design Thinking for educators; and, to identify the abductive operators mobilized by the teachers, during the training space from the premises of Design Thinking. We conclude that proposing a methodologically oriented formative moment by Design Thinking through the set of proposed activities and actions proved to be potentially important in providing the tools and offering new ways of acting intentionally and collaboratively in the planning of new solutions to educational challenges and reveal how the change in teachers' interpretive systems can be detected, in particular by examining the iterations of written subjects created by the group of teachers and their conversations captured on video from the viewpoint of abductive taxonomy. At the end of the study we recommend recommendations for future application of the developed models, we suggest that new groups of subjects involve more teachers and different areas, but considering that with a larger group to allow the mobilized abductive operators to be observed so clearly, the degree of influence between individuals and context can be broken down, a greater number of researchers will be needed to work together. It is also necessary to carry out a greater documentation of the practices that are being applied in schools, of studies that point out the use of Design Thinking in basic education in an effective and long-term way. |
id |
URPE_71824d4c0ade1a3a2d12175629753738 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/8351 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FERREIRA, Helaine SiviniGOMES, Alex SandroCAVALCANTE, Patrícia SmithARAÚJO, Monica Lopes FolenaAMARAL, Edenia Maria Ribeiro dohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6436168587984014BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de2019-11-19T12:20:30Z2018-08-31BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de. Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem. 2018. 232 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das Ciências) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8351Acting in the very stable learning ecosystem of classrooms, there was no need in the past to reflect on the role of teachers as designers of their activities, in fact teachers saw themselves predominantly as carriers and transmitters of the values and knowledge of which our cultures are made. However, things have changed and the current consensus seems to be that teachers can only face these challenges if they adopt the mindset of a designer if they begin to see themselves as designers of learning experiences. But what is perpetuated without the professional teacher realizes, the importance of this reflexive work, what prevents a new vision from being installed in the reflection of their practices, a competence that is clearly important for the exercise of their profession. For this, a new modus operandi is necessary so that this professional can seek a critical and reflexive approach on educational phenomenon. In recent years there has been the emergence and popularization of a design chain called Design Thinking (BROWN, 2010). This chain synthesizes guidelines on designing and solving problems and presents the design thinking as a tool for any professional. Design thinking has been applied in basic education in several countries of the world, including in Brazil to collaborate in the search for solutions to various educational problems. However, many of these practices are documented only with empirical experiential character and are presented on websites and social networks. Our focus is the premises of Design Thinking and the way in which teachers take ownership of them, analyzing from the perspective of the abductive logic present in this approach to the planning of teaching sequences learning in a formative process following the guidelines of the phases of Design Thinking . The delimitation of the study and the research problem was defined by the following question: Can teachers act as designers in the process of planning teaching and learning sequences based on the principles and tools of the Design Thinking approach? We seek to understand how teachers take ownership of the premises and principles of Design Thinking in a training space and to plan teaching and learning sequences; to relate the abductive operators present in the structuring of the proposal of Design Thinking for educators; and, to identify the abductive operators mobilized by the teachers, during the training space from the premises of Design Thinking. We conclude that proposing a methodologically oriented formative moment by Design Thinking through the set of proposed activities and actions proved to be potentially important in providing the tools and offering new ways of acting intentionally and collaboratively in the planning of new solutions to educational challenges and reveal how the change in teachers' interpretive systems can be detected, in particular by examining the iterations of written subjects created by the group of teachers and their conversations captured on video from the viewpoint of abductive taxonomy. At the end of the study we recommend recommendations for future application of the developed models, we suggest that new groups of subjects involve more teachers and different areas, but considering that with a larger group to allow the mobilized abductive operators to be observed so clearly, the degree of influence between individuals and context can be broken down, a greater number of researchers will be needed to work together. It is also necessary to carry out a greater documentation of the practices that are being applied in schools, of studies that point out the use of Design Thinking in basic education in an effective and long-term way.Atuando no ecossistema de aprendizagem bastante estável das salas de aula, não havia necessidade, no passado, de refletir sobre seu o papel dos professores como designers de suas atividades, na verdade os professores se viam predominantemente como portadores e transmissores dos valores e conhecimentos de que nossas culturas são feitas. No entanto, as coisas mudaram e o consenso atual parece ser que os professores só podem enfrentar esses desafios se adotarem a mentalidade de um designer, se começarem a se ver como projetistas de experiências de aprendizagem. Porém o que se perpetua sem que o profissional professor perceba, a importância desse trabalho reflexivo o que impede que se instale uma nova visão do sentido de refletir sob suas práticas, competência essa de evidente importância para o exercício de sua profissão. Para isso se faz necessário um novo modus operandi para que este profissional possa buscar uma abordagem crítica e reflexiva sobre fenômeno educacional. Nos últimos anos houve o surgimento e a popularização de uma corrente de design denominada Design Thinking (BROWN, 2010). Essa corrente sintetiza orientações sobre a concepção e resolução de problemas e apresenta o raciocínio de design como ferramenta para qualquer profissional. O design thinking tem sido aplicado na educação básica em diversos países do mundo, inclusive no Brasil no sentido de colaborar com a busca de soluções para diversos problemas educacionais. Todavia, muitas dessas práticas estão documentadas apenas com caráter experiencial empírico e estão apresentadas em sites e redes sociais. Nosso foco de observação são as premissas do Design Thinking e a maneira com que os docentes se apropriam delas, analisando sob a ótica da lógica abdutiva presente nessa abordagem para o planejamento de sequencias de ensino e aprendizagem num processo formativo seguindo as orientações das fases do Design Thinking. A delimitação do estudo e do problema de pesquisa foi definido pelas seguinte pergunta: Os professores podem atuar como designer no processo de planejamento de sequências de ensino e aprendizagem apoiados nos princípios e ferramentas da abordagem Design Thinking? Buscamos compreender de que forma os professores se apropriam das premissas e princípios do Design Thinking em um espaço de formação e para planejar sequências de ensino e aprendizagem; relacionar os operadores abdutivos presentes na estruturação da proposta de Design Thinking para educadores; e, identificar os operadores abdutivos mobilizados pelos docentes, durante o espaço de formação a partir das premissas do Design Thinking. Concluímos que o propor um momento formativo orientado metodologicamente pelo Design Thinking por meio do conjunto de atividades e ações propostas mostrou-se potencialmente importante no sentido de fornecer as ferramentas e oferecer novas maneiras de agir intencionalmente e colaborativamente no planejamento de novas soluções para desafios educacionais e revelar como a mudança nos sistemas interpretativos dos professores pode ser detectada, em particular ao examinar as iterações dos matérias escritos criados pelo grupo de professores e suas conversas capturadas em vídeo sob a ótica da taxonomia abdutiva. Ao final o estudo elencamos recomendações para futuras aplicação dos modelos desenvolvidos, sugerimos que novos grupos de sujeitos envolvam maior número de professores e de diferentes áreas, porém considerando que com um grupo maior para permitir que os operadores abdutivos mobilizados sejam observados tão claramente, e que o grau de influência entre indivíduos e contexto possa ser discriminado, será preciso um número maior de pesquisadores trabalhando conjuntamente. É preciso também que seja realizada uma documentação maior das práticas que estão sendo aplicadas nas escolas, de estudos que apontem o uso do Design Thinking na educação básica de maneira efetiva e em longo prazo.Submitted by Mario BC (mario@bc.ufrpe.br) on 2019-11-19T12:20:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Roseli Maria Goncalves Monteiro de Britto.pdf: 2902337 bytes, checksum: 7b8fe3e31f7b821ba8664d509b88f786 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-11-19T12:20:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Roseli Maria Goncalves Monteiro de Britto.pdf: 2902337 bytes, checksum: 7b8fe3e31f7b821ba8664d509b88f786 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-31application/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das CiênciasUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de EducaçãoDesign thinkingFormação de professoresEnsino-aprendizagemCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAOContribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizageminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis-6099596823942813476006006007124334461228751377-240345818910352367info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALRoseli Maria Goncalves Monteiro de Britto.pdfRoseli Maria Goncalves Monteiro de Britto.pdfapplication/pdf2902337http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8351/2/Roseli+Maria+Goncalves+Monteiro+de+Britto.pdf7b8fe3e31f7b821ba8664d509b88f786MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8351/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/83512019-11-19 09:20:30.727oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2024-05-28T12:36:51.399860Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
title |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
spellingShingle |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de Design thinking Formação de professores Ensino-aprendizagem CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
title_short |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
title_full |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
title_fullStr |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
title_sort |
Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem |
author |
BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de |
author_facet |
BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
FERREIRA, Helaine Sivini |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
GOMES, Alex Sandro |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
CAVALCANTE, Patrícia Smith |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
ARAÚJO, Monica Lopes Folena |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
AMARAL, Edenia Maria Ribeiro do |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6436168587984014 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de |
contributor_str_mv |
FERREIRA, Helaine Sivini GOMES, Alex Sandro CAVALCANTE, Patrícia Smith ARAÚJO, Monica Lopes Folena AMARAL, Edenia Maria Ribeiro do |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Design thinking Formação de professores Ensino-aprendizagem |
topic |
Design thinking Formação de professores Ensino-aprendizagem CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO |
description |
Acting in the very stable learning ecosystem of classrooms, there was no need in the past to reflect on the role of teachers as designers of their activities, in fact teachers saw themselves predominantly as carriers and transmitters of the values and knowledge of which our cultures are made. However, things have changed and the current consensus seems to be that teachers can only face these challenges if they adopt the mindset of a designer if they begin to see themselves as designers of learning experiences. But what is perpetuated without the professional teacher realizes, the importance of this reflexive work, what prevents a new vision from being installed in the reflection of their practices, a competence that is clearly important for the exercise of their profession. For this, a new modus operandi is necessary so that this professional can seek a critical and reflexive approach on educational phenomenon. In recent years there has been the emergence and popularization of a design chain called Design Thinking (BROWN, 2010). This chain synthesizes guidelines on designing and solving problems and presents the design thinking as a tool for any professional. Design thinking has been applied in basic education in several countries of the world, including in Brazil to collaborate in the search for solutions to various educational problems. However, many of these practices are documented only with empirical experiential character and are presented on websites and social networks. Our focus is the premises of Design Thinking and the way in which teachers take ownership of them, analyzing from the perspective of the abductive logic present in this approach to the planning of teaching sequences learning in a formative process following the guidelines of the phases of Design Thinking . The delimitation of the study and the research problem was defined by the following question: Can teachers act as designers in the process of planning teaching and learning sequences based on the principles and tools of the Design Thinking approach? We seek to understand how teachers take ownership of the premises and principles of Design Thinking in a training space and to plan teaching and learning sequences; to relate the abductive operators present in the structuring of the proposal of Design Thinking for educators; and, to identify the abductive operators mobilized by the teachers, during the training space from the premises of Design Thinking. We conclude that proposing a methodologically oriented formative moment by Design Thinking through the set of proposed activities and actions proved to be potentially important in providing the tools and offering new ways of acting intentionally and collaboratively in the planning of new solutions to educational challenges and reveal how the change in teachers' interpretive systems can be detected, in particular by examining the iterations of written subjects created by the group of teachers and their conversations captured on video from the viewpoint of abductive taxonomy. At the end of the study we recommend recommendations for future application of the developed models, we suggest that new groups of subjects involve more teachers and different areas, but considering that with a larger group to allow the mobilized abductive operators to be observed so clearly, the degree of influence between individuals and context can be broken down, a greater number of researchers will be needed to work together. It is also necessary to carry out a greater documentation of the practices that are being applied in schools, of studies that point out the use of Design Thinking in basic education in an effective and long-term way. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-31 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-19T12:20:30Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de. Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem. 2018. 232 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das Ciências) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8351 |
identifier_str_mv |
BRITTO, Roseli Maria Gonçalves Monteiro de. Contribuições do design thinking para a formação docente : planejamento de atividade de ensino e aprendizagem. 2018. 232 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das Ciências) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/8351 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
-609959682394281347 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
7124334461228751377 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
-240345818910352367 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino das Ciências |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Educação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8351/2/Roseli+Maria+Goncalves+Monteiro+de+Britto.pdf http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/8351/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7b8fe3e31f7b821ba8664d509b88f786 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1810102262269214720 |