Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: PASSARONE, Rafaela
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
Texto Completo: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9002
Resumo: Despite the great socio-economic relevance, the fisheries cause changes of the ecosystem and populations. Trawl fishing is not very selective and captures a large biomass of bycatch, composed by fish, mollusk, echinoderms, crustaceans, and others. The artisanal shrimp fisheries carried through beach seining has great economic and social importance in the state of Paraiba. However, there is no information on the incidental catch of this fishery and its effects on the ecosystem. This study aims to evaluate the effects of shrimp fishing on the species of bycatch in Lucena (PB), in the Northeast of Brazil and makes a comparative analysis of the impacts of beach seining (BS) and motorized trawling (MT), which currently is prohibited by legislation. To describe the beach seining in Lucena, monthly samplings were conducted between December 2016 and November 2017. Ichthyofauna was identified and described in abundance in number and biomass. Specimens were measured and their size classes were correlated to the Size at first maturity (L50). Ichthyofauna was also described in the risk of extinction, using parameters of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and they were classified considering feeding mode functional groups (FMFG) and estuary use functional groups (EUFG). The allometric coefficient was calculated for species with n exceeding 30 individuals that contained a satisfactory size range (33 species) of those 30 had negative allometric coefficient. A total of 199 kg (30.2%) of shrimp and 460 kg of fish (69.8%) were caught. The average catch proportion of target species and bycatch observed was 1:2.3. The bycatch was composed of 31.008 individuals of 11 orders, 36 families and 119 species. The most representative families were Sciaenidae, Pristigasteridae and Clupeidae, and the most expressive species were Opisthonema oglinum, Cetengraulis edentulus, and Pellona harroweri. The abiotic factors that most influenced this cycle of changes in the community were rainfall, flow and salinity and the species that varied most in abundance and/or biomass along this cycle were Lycengraulis grossidens, Menticirrhus americanus, Trichiurus lepturus, Chloroscombrus chrysurus e Cathorops spixii, Centropomus parallelus e Rhinosardinia bahiensis. According to the risk classification (IUCN), most (88) of the species were categorized as least concern (LC). A total of 66% of captured individuals did not reach sexual maturity (L50), indicating a high capture of juveniles. Considering the feeding functional group (FMFG), most species (61) were classified as zoobentivorous, indicating a higher susceptibility of species associated with the seabed. Regarding the use of the estuary (EUFG), the majority (49) were classified as marine migrant and marine stragglers (36), indicating the predominant migratory behavior in the captured species and the use of the coastal region as feeding and shelter area. The ecological indexes did not show a pattern of monthly or seasonal variation. Beach trawling captured a superior richness of species (AP 119; AM 58), while the proportion of bycatch was higher for motor trawling (AP 1:2,3; AM 1:3,2). The composition of ichthyofauna showed great similarity (81%), as well as the proportion of distribution of functional groups and the annual estimate of capture: shrimp (AP 87.9; AM 65.6 ton) and bycatch (AP 202; AM 210 ton). The similarities between these fishing modalities break a paradigm of low impact regarding beach trawling, whose effects are similar to motorized fishing in the different aspects approached.
id URPE_7f3ef99a8328d625e9ec14ffd50a2758
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/9002
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling FRÉDOU, Flávia LucenaEL-DEIR, Ana Carla AsforaSILVA, Francisco Marcante Santana daFRÉDOU, Thierryhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8096305567799187PASSARONE, Rafaela2023-05-29T14:34:02Z2020-02-27PASSARONE, Rafaela. Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro. 2020. 99 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9002Despite the great socio-economic relevance, the fisheries cause changes of the ecosystem and populations. Trawl fishing is not very selective and captures a large biomass of bycatch, composed by fish, mollusk, echinoderms, crustaceans, and others. The artisanal shrimp fisheries carried through beach seining has great economic and social importance in the state of Paraiba. However, there is no information on the incidental catch of this fishery and its effects on the ecosystem. This study aims to evaluate the effects of shrimp fishing on the species of bycatch in Lucena (PB), in the Northeast of Brazil and makes a comparative analysis of the impacts of beach seining (BS) and motorized trawling (MT), which currently is prohibited by legislation. To describe the beach seining in Lucena, monthly samplings were conducted between December 2016 and November 2017. Ichthyofauna was identified and described in abundance in number and biomass. Specimens were measured and their size classes were correlated to the Size at first maturity (L50). Ichthyofauna was also described in the risk of extinction, using parameters of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and they were classified considering feeding mode functional groups (FMFG) and estuary use functional groups (EUFG). The allometric coefficient was calculated for species with n exceeding 30 individuals that contained a satisfactory size range (33 species) of those 30 had negative allometric coefficient. A total of 199 kg (30.2%) of shrimp and 460 kg of fish (69.8%) were caught. The average catch proportion of target species and bycatch observed was 1:2.3. The bycatch was composed of 31.008 individuals of 11 orders, 36 families and 119 species. The most representative families were Sciaenidae, Pristigasteridae and Clupeidae, and the most expressive species were Opisthonema oglinum, Cetengraulis edentulus, and Pellona harroweri. The abiotic factors that most influenced this cycle of changes in the community were rainfall, flow and salinity and the species that varied most in abundance and/or biomass along this cycle were Lycengraulis grossidens, Menticirrhus americanus, Trichiurus lepturus, Chloroscombrus chrysurus e Cathorops spixii, Centropomus parallelus e Rhinosardinia bahiensis. According to the risk classification (IUCN), most (88) of the species were categorized as least concern (LC). A total of 66% of captured individuals did not reach sexual maturity (L50), indicating a high capture of juveniles. Considering the feeding functional group (FMFG), most species (61) were classified as zoobentivorous, indicating a higher susceptibility of species associated with the seabed. Regarding the use of the estuary (EUFG), the majority (49) were classified as marine migrant and marine stragglers (36), indicating the predominant migratory behavior in the captured species and the use of the coastal region as feeding and shelter area. The ecological indexes did not show a pattern of monthly or seasonal variation. Beach trawling captured a superior richness of species (AP 119; AM 58), while the proportion of bycatch was higher for motor trawling (AP 1:2,3; AM 1:3,2). The composition of ichthyofauna showed great similarity (81%), as well as the proportion of distribution of functional groups and the annual estimate of capture: shrimp (AP 87.9; AM 65.6 ton) and bycatch (AP 202; AM 210 ton). The similarities between these fishing modalities break a paradigm of low impact regarding beach trawling, whose effects are similar to motorized fishing in the different aspects approached.Apesar da grande relevância socioeconômica, a pesca provoca alterações no ecossistema e populações. A pesca de arrasto é pouco seletiva e captura uma grande biomassa de fauna acompanhante ou bycatch, composta por peixes, moluscos, equinodermos, crustáceos etc. A pesca camaroneira artesanal, por arrasto de praia, tem grande importância socioeconômica no estado da Paraíba. Porém, não há informações acerca da captura incidental desta pescaria e seus efeitos no ecossistema. O presente estudo tem como objetivo avaliar os efeitos da pesca camaroneira sob a ictiofauna acompanhante em Lucena (PB), no Nordeste do Brasil e comparar a pesca de arrasto de praia (AP) com a pesca de arrasto motorizada (AM), atualmente proibida pela legislação. Para a descrição do bycatch da pesca de arrasto de praia em Lucena, foram realizadas coletas mensais entre dezembro de 2016 e novembro de 2017. A ictiofauna foi identificada e descrita quanto a sua abundância relativa em número e biomassa. Os espécimes foram medidos e suas classes de tamanho relacionadas ao tamanho de primeira maturação (L50), obtidos na literatura. A ictiofauna também foi descrita quanto ao risco de extinção, utilizando os parâmetros da União Internacional para a Conservação da Natureza e dos Recursos Naturais (IUCN) e classificada considerando os grupos funcionais alimentares (FMFG) e de uso do estuário (EUFG). O coeficiente alométrico foi calculado para espécies com n superior a 30 indivíduos que continham satisfatória amplitude de tamanho (33 espécies), destas 30 espécies apresentaram coeficiente alométrico negativo. Foram capturados no total 199 kg (30,2%) de camarão e 460 kg de peixe (69,8%). A proporção média de captura de camarão e ictiofauna foi de 1:2,3. O bycatch foi composto por 31.008 peixes de 11 ordens, 36 famílias e 119 espécies. As famílias mais representativas foram Sciaenidae, Pristigasteridae e Clupeidae, e as espécies mais representativas Opisthonema oglinum, Cetengraulis edentulus e Pellona harroweri. Os fatores abióticos que mais influenciaram no ciclo de mudanças na comunidade foram pluviometria, vazão e salinidade e as espécies que que mais variaram em abundância e/ou biomassa ao longo deste ciclo foram Lycengraulis grossidens, Menticirrhus americanus, Trichiurus lepturus, Chloroscombrus chrysurus, Cathorops spixii, Centropomus parallelus e Rhinosardinia bahiensis. Segundo a classificação de risco (IUCN), 88 espécies foram categorizadas como menos preocupante (LC). Um total de 66% dos espécimes capturados não atingiu a maturidade sexual (L50), indicando uma alta captura de jovens. Considerando o grupo funcional (FMFG), a maioria das espécies (61) foram classificadas como zoobentívoras, indicando uma maior suscetibilidade das espécies associadas com o fundo marinho. Com relação ao uso do estuário (EUFG), a maioria (49) foi classificada como marinho migrante e marinho visitante (36), indicando o predominante comportamento migratório nas espécies capturadas e o uso da região costeira como área de alimentação e abrigo. Uma alta riqueza e diversidade de espécies foram observadas na localidade. Os índices ecológicos não apresentaram um padrão de variação mensal ou sazonal. A pesca de arrasto de praia capturou uma riqueza superior de espécies (AP 119; AM 58), enquanto a proporção de fauna acompanhante foi superior para o arrasto motorizado (AP 1:2,3; AM 1:3,2). A composição da ictiofauna apresentou grande semelhança (44 esp. em comum), assim como a proporção de distribuição dos grupos funcionais e a estimativa anual de captura: camarão (AP 87.9; AM 65,6 ton) e bycatch (AP 202; AM 210 ton). As similaridades entre estas modalidades de pesca quebram um paradigma de baixo impacto relacionado a pesca de arrasto de praia, cujo efeitos são similares com a pesca motorizada nos diversos aspectos abordados.Submitted by (ana.araujo@ufrpe.br) on 2023-05-29T14:34:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafaela Passarone.pdf: 2377829 bytes, checksum: 1123bc209a8bb8f3b9c9a9e0b1c09c51 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-29T14:34:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rafaela Passarone.pdf: 2377829 bytes, checksum: 1123bc209a8bb8f3b9c9a9e0b1c09c51 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020-02-27Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPqapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em EcologiaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de BiologiaCamarãoPesca de arrastoCaptura incidentalFauna acompanhanteCapturas acessórias (pescas)CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIAAvaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-3370416653406378150600600600600-26967445355890967003263499605295365002-2555911436985713659info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALRafaela Passarone.pdfRafaela Passarone.pdfapplication/pdf2377829http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9002/2/Rafaela+Passarone.pdf1123bc209a8bb8f3b9c9a9e0b1c09c51MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9002/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/90022023-05-29 11:34:02.406oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2023-05-29T14:34:02Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
title Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
spellingShingle Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
PASSARONE, Rafaela
Camarão
Pesca de arrasto
Captura incidental
Fauna acompanhante
Capturas acessórias (pescas)
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
title_short Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
title_full Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
title_fullStr Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
title_sort Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro
author PASSARONE, Rafaela
author_facet PASSARONE, Rafaela
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv FRÉDOU, Flávia Lucena
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv EL-DEIR, Ana Carla Asfora
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv SILVA, Francisco Marcante Santana da
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv FRÉDOU, Thierry
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8096305567799187
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv PASSARONE, Rafaela
contributor_str_mv FRÉDOU, Flávia Lucena
EL-DEIR, Ana Carla Asfora
SILVA, Francisco Marcante Santana da
FRÉDOU, Thierry
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Camarão
Pesca de arrasto
Captura incidental
Fauna acompanhante
Capturas acessórias (pescas)
topic Camarão
Pesca de arrasto
Captura incidental
Fauna acompanhante
Capturas acessórias (pescas)
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
description Despite the great socio-economic relevance, the fisheries cause changes of the ecosystem and populations. Trawl fishing is not very selective and captures a large biomass of bycatch, composed by fish, mollusk, echinoderms, crustaceans, and others. The artisanal shrimp fisheries carried through beach seining has great economic and social importance in the state of Paraiba. However, there is no information on the incidental catch of this fishery and its effects on the ecosystem. This study aims to evaluate the effects of shrimp fishing on the species of bycatch in Lucena (PB), in the Northeast of Brazil and makes a comparative analysis of the impacts of beach seining (BS) and motorized trawling (MT), which currently is prohibited by legislation. To describe the beach seining in Lucena, monthly samplings were conducted between December 2016 and November 2017. Ichthyofauna was identified and described in abundance in number and biomass. Specimens were measured and their size classes were correlated to the Size at first maturity (L50). Ichthyofauna was also described in the risk of extinction, using parameters of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and they were classified considering feeding mode functional groups (FMFG) and estuary use functional groups (EUFG). The allometric coefficient was calculated for species with n exceeding 30 individuals that contained a satisfactory size range (33 species) of those 30 had negative allometric coefficient. A total of 199 kg (30.2%) of shrimp and 460 kg of fish (69.8%) were caught. The average catch proportion of target species and bycatch observed was 1:2.3. The bycatch was composed of 31.008 individuals of 11 orders, 36 families and 119 species. The most representative families were Sciaenidae, Pristigasteridae and Clupeidae, and the most expressive species were Opisthonema oglinum, Cetengraulis edentulus, and Pellona harroweri. The abiotic factors that most influenced this cycle of changes in the community were rainfall, flow and salinity and the species that varied most in abundance and/or biomass along this cycle were Lycengraulis grossidens, Menticirrhus americanus, Trichiurus lepturus, Chloroscombrus chrysurus e Cathorops spixii, Centropomus parallelus e Rhinosardinia bahiensis. According to the risk classification (IUCN), most (88) of the species were categorized as least concern (LC). A total of 66% of captured individuals did not reach sexual maturity (L50), indicating a high capture of juveniles. Considering the feeding functional group (FMFG), most species (61) were classified as zoobentivorous, indicating a higher susceptibility of species associated with the seabed. Regarding the use of the estuary (EUFG), the majority (49) were classified as marine migrant and marine stragglers (36), indicating the predominant migratory behavior in the captured species and the use of the coastal region as feeding and shelter area. The ecological indexes did not show a pattern of monthly or seasonal variation. Beach trawling captured a superior richness of species (AP 119; AM 58), while the proportion of bycatch was higher for motor trawling (AP 1:2,3; AM 1:3,2). The composition of ichthyofauna showed great similarity (81%), as well as the proportion of distribution of functional groups and the annual estimate of capture: shrimp (AP 87.9; AM 65.6 ton) and bycatch (AP 202; AM 210 ton). The similarities between these fishing modalities break a paradigm of low impact regarding beach trawling, whose effects are similar to motorized fishing in the different aspects approached.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-02-27
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-05-29T14:34:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv PASSARONE, Rafaela. Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro. 2020. 99 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9002
identifier_str_mv PASSARONE, Rafaela. Avaliação da fauna acompanhante da pesca camaroneira e comparação entre as modalidades de arrasto de praia e arrasto motorizado na Paraíba, Nordeste brasileiro. 2020. 99 f. Dissertação (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -3370416653406378150
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -2696744535589096700
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 3263499605295365002
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv -2555911436985713659
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Biologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9002/2/Rafaela+Passarone.pdf
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9002/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1123bc209a8bb8f3b9c9a9e0b1c09c51
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1800311504781705216