Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: POTIN, Denner Manthay
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
Texto Completo: http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225
Resumo: Beneficial arthropods provide significant services for crop production, such as natural biological control of pest species. Despite that, there is a lack of data on the response of beneficial epigeal arthropod community to the insecticides used on the plant canopy, especially, in the cotton ecosystem, where pest control relies highly on the use of synthetic insecticides. For example, the epigeal predator earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), can contribute to the control of different cotton pest species, mainly preying upon larvae and pupae of boll weevil inside flower buds fallen to the ground. This work aimed to assess the impact of insecticide use on the beneficial arthropods from the plant canopy and epigeal community (i), and to study the impact of 12 selected insecticides, recommended for the control of cotton pest species, for the epigeal predator, E. annulipes (ii), through insecticide dried-residues, ingestion of contaminated prey, and predation rate under insecticides-treated prey and plant. Response of beneficial arthropod communities to the insecticides was assessed through principal response curves (PRC), abundance, richness, and dominance indices. The impact of non-selective insecticides was detected in 2018, through lower predator abundance, and change in the predator community from plant canopy with significant contribution of ants and spiders for the outcome. There was a lack of impact on the plant canopy predator community, in 2020, and on the epigeal community for both seasons, 2018 and 2020. Across the 12 tested insecticides under laboratory conditions, pymetrozine, chlorantraniliprole, and spinetoram were of low impact to the predator regardless the population, developmental stage, and exposition routes. Cyantraniliprole exhibited impact depending on the predator age and exposition route; while, pyriproxyfen was harmless to the adults, but did not allow nymphs to molt to the adult stage. Chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and malathion were harmful to the predator. The field data revealed the importance of insecticide application when the pest populations reach the economic threshold resulting in variable numbers and time of insecticide applications and, hence, showing a variable impact on communities of predator and beneficial arthropods from plant canopy and epigeal. The results from laboratory assays explain that the selectivity outcome varies as a function of predator contact with the insecticides, stage, and behavior of the predator and with the insecticide tested.
id URPE_93855220bf2dac9f8c66be4a29df551b
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2:tede2/9225
network_acronym_str URPE
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
repository_id_str
spelling TORRES, Jorge BrazBASTOS, Cristina SchetinoANDRADE, Gilberto SantosMARTINS, Ivan Carlos FernandesBATISTA, Jacinto de Lunahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9743571728996841POTIN, Denner Manthay2023-07-13T19:16:13Z2021-05-21POTIN, Denner Manthay. Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos. 2021. 123 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225Beneficial arthropods provide significant services for crop production, such as natural biological control of pest species. Despite that, there is a lack of data on the response of beneficial epigeal arthropod community to the insecticides used on the plant canopy, especially, in the cotton ecosystem, where pest control relies highly on the use of synthetic insecticides. For example, the epigeal predator earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), can contribute to the control of different cotton pest species, mainly preying upon larvae and pupae of boll weevil inside flower buds fallen to the ground. This work aimed to assess the impact of insecticide use on the beneficial arthropods from the plant canopy and epigeal community (i), and to study the impact of 12 selected insecticides, recommended for the control of cotton pest species, for the epigeal predator, E. annulipes (ii), through insecticide dried-residues, ingestion of contaminated prey, and predation rate under insecticides-treated prey and plant. Response of beneficial arthropod communities to the insecticides was assessed through principal response curves (PRC), abundance, richness, and dominance indices. The impact of non-selective insecticides was detected in 2018, through lower predator abundance, and change in the predator community from plant canopy with significant contribution of ants and spiders for the outcome. There was a lack of impact on the plant canopy predator community, in 2020, and on the epigeal community for both seasons, 2018 and 2020. Across the 12 tested insecticides under laboratory conditions, pymetrozine, chlorantraniliprole, and spinetoram were of low impact to the predator regardless the population, developmental stage, and exposition routes. Cyantraniliprole exhibited impact depending on the predator age and exposition route; while, pyriproxyfen was harmless to the adults, but did not allow nymphs to molt to the adult stage. Chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and malathion were harmful to the predator. The field data revealed the importance of insecticide application when the pest populations reach the economic threshold resulting in variable numbers and time of insecticide applications and, hence, showing a variable impact on communities of predator and beneficial arthropods from plant canopy and epigeal. The results from laboratory assays explain that the selectivity outcome varies as a function of predator contact with the insecticides, stage, and behavior of the predator and with the insecticide tested.Artrópodes benéficos oferecem serviços relevantes para os agroecossistemas, entre eles, o controle biológico natural de pragas. Contudo, a comunidade de artrópodes edáficos é pouco conhecida nesses agroecossistemas, bem como a resposta desses aos inseticidas usados no controle de pragas. No agroecossistema algodoeiro, o controle de pragas é altamente dependente do uso de inseticidas sintéticos, o que pode afetar negativamente artrópodes benéficos, como por exemplo, a tesourinha predadora edáfica, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), que contribui no controle de diferentes espécies praga, em especial de larvas e pupas do bicudo-do-algodoeiro, localizadas no interior de botões florais caídos ao solo. Assim, este trabalho objetivou avaliar o manejo de inseticidas, entre seletivos e não seletivos, sobre as comunidades de artrópodes benéficos do dossel e edáficos (i), e determinar o efeito de 12 inseticidas recomendados para o controle de pragas do algodoeiro, sobre a tesourinha, E. annulipes (ii), mediante bioensaios de contato residual, ingestão de presa contaminada e taxa de predação sobre presa e plantas pulverizadas. Abundância, riqueza, dominância de espécies, e curvas de resposta principal (PRC) foram empregadas para avaliar o impacto do manejo de inseticidas sobre as comunidades de predadores do dossel das plantas e artrópodes benéficos edáficos (predadores e outros não herbívoros). Houve menor abundância de predadores e impacto sobre a comunidade de predadores do dossel, em 2018, no tratamento com inseticida não seletivo, com significante contribuição das espécies de formigas e aranhas para esse resultado. Os resultados não mostraram efeito do manejo dos inseticidas sobre os predadores do dossel das plantas, em 2020, e para a comunidade epigeal, em 2018 e 2020. Em laboratório, entre os 12 inseticidas estudados, pimetrozina, clorantraniliprole e espinetoram foram seletivos, independente da forma de contato, população e idade do predador. Ciantraniliprole apresentou efeito dependente da idade do predador e forma de contato, enquanto o piriproxifem não matou tesourinhas adultas, mas impediu as ninfas de realizarem a muda para a fase adulta. Clorfenapir, indoxacarbe, lambda-cialotrina, clorpirifós, dimetoato e malationa foram tóxicos para o predador. Os resultados de campo revelaram a importância do manejo de inseticidas para o controle de pragas quando atingem o nível de controle, bem como diferenças no efeito sobre as comunidades de predadores do dossel e artrópodes benéficos edáficos, em função do número e época das aplicações dos inseticidas. Os resultados de laboratório revelaram que a seletividade varia em função da forma de contato, idade e comportamento do predador e do inseticida testado.Submitted by (ana.araujo@ufrpe.br) on 2023-07-13T19:16:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Denner Manthay Potin.pdf: 3254925 bytes, checksum: 67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-13T19:16:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Denner Manthay Potin.pdf: 3254925 bytes, checksum: 67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-05-21Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia AgrícolaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaAlgodoeiroInseticida seletivoEcotoxicologiaInsetos úteisArtrópodeControle biológicoFITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLAManejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficosInsecticides management for cotton pest control and beneficial arthropods interactioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis1292500575037930971600600600600-680055387997222920519080153008238414002075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALDenner Manthay Potin.pdfDenner Manthay Potin.pdfapplication/pdf3254925http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/2/Denner+Manthay+Potin.pdf67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/92252023-07-13 16:16:13.305oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2023-07-13T19:16:13Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Insecticides management for cotton pest control and beneficial arthropods interaction
title Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
spellingShingle Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
POTIN, Denner Manthay
Algodoeiro
Inseticida seletivo
Ecotoxicologia
Insetos úteis
Artrópode
Controle biológico
FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA
title_short Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
title_full Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
title_fullStr Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
title_full_unstemmed Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
title_sort Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
author POTIN, Denner Manthay
author_facet POTIN, Denner Manthay
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv TORRES, Jorge Braz
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv BASTOS, Cristina Schetino
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv ANDRADE, Gilberto Santos
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv MARTINS, Ivan Carlos Fernandes
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv BATISTA, Jacinto de Luna
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9743571728996841
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv POTIN, Denner Manthay
contributor_str_mv TORRES, Jorge Braz
BASTOS, Cristina Schetino
ANDRADE, Gilberto Santos
MARTINS, Ivan Carlos Fernandes
BATISTA, Jacinto de Luna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Algodoeiro
Inseticida seletivo
Ecotoxicologia
Insetos úteis
Artrópode
Controle biológico
topic Algodoeiro
Inseticida seletivo
Ecotoxicologia
Insetos úteis
Artrópode
Controle biológico
FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA
description Beneficial arthropods provide significant services for crop production, such as natural biological control of pest species. Despite that, there is a lack of data on the response of beneficial epigeal arthropod community to the insecticides used on the plant canopy, especially, in the cotton ecosystem, where pest control relies highly on the use of synthetic insecticides. For example, the epigeal predator earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), can contribute to the control of different cotton pest species, mainly preying upon larvae and pupae of boll weevil inside flower buds fallen to the ground. This work aimed to assess the impact of insecticide use on the beneficial arthropods from the plant canopy and epigeal community (i), and to study the impact of 12 selected insecticides, recommended for the control of cotton pest species, for the epigeal predator, E. annulipes (ii), through insecticide dried-residues, ingestion of contaminated prey, and predation rate under insecticides-treated prey and plant. Response of beneficial arthropod communities to the insecticides was assessed through principal response curves (PRC), abundance, richness, and dominance indices. The impact of non-selective insecticides was detected in 2018, through lower predator abundance, and change in the predator community from plant canopy with significant contribution of ants and spiders for the outcome. There was a lack of impact on the plant canopy predator community, in 2020, and on the epigeal community for both seasons, 2018 and 2020. Across the 12 tested insecticides under laboratory conditions, pymetrozine, chlorantraniliprole, and spinetoram were of low impact to the predator regardless the population, developmental stage, and exposition routes. Cyantraniliprole exhibited impact depending on the predator age and exposition route; while, pyriproxyfen was harmless to the adults, but did not allow nymphs to molt to the adult stage. Chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and malathion were harmful to the predator. The field data revealed the importance of insecticide application when the pest populations reach the economic threshold resulting in variable numbers and time of insecticide applications and, hence, showing a variable impact on communities of predator and beneficial arthropods from plant canopy and epigeal. The results from laboratory assays explain that the selectivity outcome varies as a function of predator contact with the insecticides, stage, and behavior of the predator and with the insecticide tested.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-05-21
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-07-13T19:16:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv POTIN, Denner Manthay. Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos. 2021. 123 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225
identifier_str_mv POTIN, Denner Manthay. Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos. 2021. 123 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
url http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 1292500575037930971
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
600
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv -6800553879972229205
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv 1908015300823841400
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv 2075167498588264571
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRPE
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Departamento de Agronomia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron:UFRPE
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
instacron_str UFRPE
institution UFRPE
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/2/Denner+Manthay+Potin.pdf
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br
_version_ 1800311508821868544