Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
Texto Completo: | http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225 |
Resumo: | Beneficial arthropods provide significant services for crop production, such as natural biological control of pest species. Despite that, there is a lack of data on the response of beneficial epigeal arthropod community to the insecticides used on the plant canopy, especially, in the cotton ecosystem, where pest control relies highly on the use of synthetic insecticides. For example, the epigeal predator earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), can contribute to the control of different cotton pest species, mainly preying upon larvae and pupae of boll weevil inside flower buds fallen to the ground. This work aimed to assess the impact of insecticide use on the beneficial arthropods from the plant canopy and epigeal community (i), and to study the impact of 12 selected insecticides, recommended for the control of cotton pest species, for the epigeal predator, E. annulipes (ii), through insecticide dried-residues, ingestion of contaminated prey, and predation rate under insecticides-treated prey and plant. Response of beneficial arthropod communities to the insecticides was assessed through principal response curves (PRC), abundance, richness, and dominance indices. The impact of non-selective insecticides was detected in 2018, through lower predator abundance, and change in the predator community from plant canopy with significant contribution of ants and spiders for the outcome. There was a lack of impact on the plant canopy predator community, in 2020, and on the epigeal community for both seasons, 2018 and 2020. Across the 12 tested insecticides under laboratory conditions, pymetrozine, chlorantraniliprole, and spinetoram were of low impact to the predator regardless the population, developmental stage, and exposition routes. Cyantraniliprole exhibited impact depending on the predator age and exposition route; while, pyriproxyfen was harmless to the adults, but did not allow nymphs to molt to the adult stage. Chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and malathion were harmful to the predator. The field data revealed the importance of insecticide application when the pest populations reach the economic threshold resulting in variable numbers and time of insecticide applications and, hence, showing a variable impact on communities of predator and beneficial arthropods from plant canopy and epigeal. The results from laboratory assays explain that the selectivity outcome varies as a function of predator contact with the insecticides, stage, and behavior of the predator and with the insecticide tested. |
id |
URPE_93855220bf2dac9f8c66be4a29df551b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2:tede2/9225 |
network_acronym_str |
URPE |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TORRES, Jorge BrazBASTOS, Cristina SchetinoANDRADE, Gilberto SantosMARTINS, Ivan Carlos FernandesBATISTA, Jacinto de Lunahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9743571728996841POTIN, Denner Manthay2023-07-13T19:16:13Z2021-05-21POTIN, Denner Manthay. Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos. 2021. 123 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225Beneficial arthropods provide significant services for crop production, such as natural biological control of pest species. Despite that, there is a lack of data on the response of beneficial epigeal arthropod community to the insecticides used on the plant canopy, especially, in the cotton ecosystem, where pest control relies highly on the use of synthetic insecticides. For example, the epigeal predator earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), can contribute to the control of different cotton pest species, mainly preying upon larvae and pupae of boll weevil inside flower buds fallen to the ground. This work aimed to assess the impact of insecticide use on the beneficial arthropods from the plant canopy and epigeal community (i), and to study the impact of 12 selected insecticides, recommended for the control of cotton pest species, for the epigeal predator, E. annulipes (ii), through insecticide dried-residues, ingestion of contaminated prey, and predation rate under insecticides-treated prey and plant. Response of beneficial arthropod communities to the insecticides was assessed through principal response curves (PRC), abundance, richness, and dominance indices. The impact of non-selective insecticides was detected in 2018, through lower predator abundance, and change in the predator community from plant canopy with significant contribution of ants and spiders for the outcome. There was a lack of impact on the plant canopy predator community, in 2020, and on the epigeal community for both seasons, 2018 and 2020. Across the 12 tested insecticides under laboratory conditions, pymetrozine, chlorantraniliprole, and spinetoram were of low impact to the predator regardless the population, developmental stage, and exposition routes. Cyantraniliprole exhibited impact depending on the predator age and exposition route; while, pyriproxyfen was harmless to the adults, but did not allow nymphs to molt to the adult stage. Chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and malathion were harmful to the predator. The field data revealed the importance of insecticide application when the pest populations reach the economic threshold resulting in variable numbers and time of insecticide applications and, hence, showing a variable impact on communities of predator and beneficial arthropods from plant canopy and epigeal. The results from laboratory assays explain that the selectivity outcome varies as a function of predator contact with the insecticides, stage, and behavior of the predator and with the insecticide tested.Artrópodes benéficos oferecem serviços relevantes para os agroecossistemas, entre eles, o controle biológico natural de pragas. Contudo, a comunidade de artrópodes edáficos é pouco conhecida nesses agroecossistemas, bem como a resposta desses aos inseticidas usados no controle de pragas. No agroecossistema algodoeiro, o controle de pragas é altamente dependente do uso de inseticidas sintéticos, o que pode afetar negativamente artrópodes benéficos, como por exemplo, a tesourinha predadora edáfica, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), que contribui no controle de diferentes espécies praga, em especial de larvas e pupas do bicudo-do-algodoeiro, localizadas no interior de botões florais caídos ao solo. Assim, este trabalho objetivou avaliar o manejo de inseticidas, entre seletivos e não seletivos, sobre as comunidades de artrópodes benéficos do dossel e edáficos (i), e determinar o efeito de 12 inseticidas recomendados para o controle de pragas do algodoeiro, sobre a tesourinha, E. annulipes (ii), mediante bioensaios de contato residual, ingestão de presa contaminada e taxa de predação sobre presa e plantas pulverizadas. Abundância, riqueza, dominância de espécies, e curvas de resposta principal (PRC) foram empregadas para avaliar o impacto do manejo de inseticidas sobre as comunidades de predadores do dossel das plantas e artrópodes benéficos edáficos (predadores e outros não herbívoros). Houve menor abundância de predadores e impacto sobre a comunidade de predadores do dossel, em 2018, no tratamento com inseticida não seletivo, com significante contribuição das espécies de formigas e aranhas para esse resultado. Os resultados não mostraram efeito do manejo dos inseticidas sobre os predadores do dossel das plantas, em 2020, e para a comunidade epigeal, em 2018 e 2020. Em laboratório, entre os 12 inseticidas estudados, pimetrozina, clorantraniliprole e espinetoram foram seletivos, independente da forma de contato, população e idade do predador. Ciantraniliprole apresentou efeito dependente da idade do predador e forma de contato, enquanto o piriproxifem não matou tesourinhas adultas, mas impediu as ninfas de realizarem a muda para a fase adulta. Clorfenapir, indoxacarbe, lambda-cialotrina, clorpirifós, dimetoato e malationa foram tóxicos para o predador. Os resultados de campo revelaram a importância do manejo de inseticidas para o controle de pragas quando atingem o nível de controle, bem como diferenças no efeito sobre as comunidades de predadores do dossel e artrópodes benéficos edáficos, em função do número e época das aplicações dos inseticidas. Os resultados de laboratório revelaram que a seletividade varia em função da forma de contato, idade e comportamento do predador e do inseticida testado.Submitted by (ana.araujo@ufrpe.br) on 2023-07-13T19:16:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Denner Manthay Potin.pdf: 3254925 bytes, checksum: 67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-13T19:16:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Denner Manthay Potin.pdf: 3254925 bytes, checksum: 67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021-05-21Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia AgrícolaUFRPEBrasilDepartamento de AgronomiaAlgodoeiroInseticida seletivoEcotoxicologiaInsetos úteisArtrópodeControle biológicoFITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLAManejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficosInsecticides management for cotton pest control and beneficial arthropods interactioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis1292500575037930971600600600600-680055387997222920519080153008238414002075167498588264571info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPEinstname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEORIGINALDenner Manthay Potin.pdfDenner Manthay Potin.pdfapplication/pdf3254925http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/2/Denner+Manthay+Potin.pdf67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede2/92252023-07-13 16:16:13.305oai:tede2: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede/PUBhttp://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/oai/requestbdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.bropendoar:2023-07-13T19:16:13Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
Insecticides management for cotton pest control and beneficial arthropods interaction |
title |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
spellingShingle |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos POTIN, Denner Manthay Algodoeiro Inseticida seletivo Ecotoxicologia Insetos úteis Artrópode Controle biológico FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
title_short |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
title_full |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
title_fullStr |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
title_sort |
Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos |
author |
POTIN, Denner Manthay |
author_facet |
POTIN, Denner Manthay |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
TORRES, Jorge Braz |
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv |
BASTOS, Cristina Schetino |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
ANDRADE, Gilberto Santos |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
MARTINS, Ivan Carlos Fernandes |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
BATISTA, Jacinto de Luna |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9743571728996841 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
POTIN, Denner Manthay |
contributor_str_mv |
TORRES, Jorge Braz BASTOS, Cristina Schetino ANDRADE, Gilberto Santos MARTINS, Ivan Carlos Fernandes BATISTA, Jacinto de Luna |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Algodoeiro Inseticida seletivo Ecotoxicologia Insetos úteis Artrópode Controle biológico |
topic |
Algodoeiro Inseticida seletivo Ecotoxicologia Insetos úteis Artrópode Controle biológico FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
FITOSSANIDADE::ENTOMOLOGIA AGRICOLA |
description |
Beneficial arthropods provide significant services for crop production, such as natural biological control of pest species. Despite that, there is a lack of data on the response of beneficial epigeal arthropod community to the insecticides used on the plant canopy, especially, in the cotton ecosystem, where pest control relies highly on the use of synthetic insecticides. For example, the epigeal predator earwig, Euborellia annulipes (Lucas), can contribute to the control of different cotton pest species, mainly preying upon larvae and pupae of boll weevil inside flower buds fallen to the ground. This work aimed to assess the impact of insecticide use on the beneficial arthropods from the plant canopy and epigeal community (i), and to study the impact of 12 selected insecticides, recommended for the control of cotton pest species, for the epigeal predator, E. annulipes (ii), through insecticide dried-residues, ingestion of contaminated prey, and predation rate under insecticides-treated prey and plant. Response of beneficial arthropod communities to the insecticides was assessed through principal response curves (PRC), abundance, richness, and dominance indices. The impact of non-selective insecticides was detected in 2018, through lower predator abundance, and change in the predator community from plant canopy with significant contribution of ants and spiders for the outcome. There was a lack of impact on the plant canopy predator community, in 2020, and on the epigeal community for both seasons, 2018 and 2020. Across the 12 tested insecticides under laboratory conditions, pymetrozine, chlorantraniliprole, and spinetoram were of low impact to the predator regardless the population, developmental stage, and exposition routes. Cyantraniliprole exhibited impact depending on the predator age and exposition route; while, pyriproxyfen was harmless to the adults, but did not allow nymphs to molt to the adult stage. Chlorfenapyr, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, dimethoate, and malathion were harmful to the predator. The field data revealed the importance of insecticide application when the pest populations reach the economic threshold resulting in variable numbers and time of insecticide applications and, hence, showing a variable impact on communities of predator and beneficial arthropods from plant canopy and epigeal. The results from laboratory assays explain that the selectivity outcome varies as a function of predator contact with the insecticides, stage, and behavior of the predator and with the insecticide tested. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-21 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-13T19:16:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
POTIN, Denner Manthay. Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos. 2021. 123 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225 |
identifier_str_mv |
POTIN, Denner Manthay. Manejo de inseticidas para controle de pragas do algodoeiro e interação com artrópodes benéficos. 2021. 123 f. Tese (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife. |
url |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/handle/tede2/9225 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
1292500575037930971 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 600 600 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
-6800553879972229205 |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
1908015300823841400 |
dc.relation.sponsorship.fl_str_mv |
2075167498588264571 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Entomologia Agrícola |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFRPE |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Agronomia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/2/Denner+Manthay+Potin.pdf http://www.tede2.ufrpe.br:8080/tede2/bitstream/tede2/9225/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
67d5b66a2f2dfbe32e53fe497bac78b5 bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRPE - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd@ufrpe.br ||bdtd@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1800311508821868544 |