Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | arq.urb |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142 |
Resumo: | This article discusses the RIBA's recent exhibition:Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling which offers a renewed examination of two iconic architectural schemes proposed for the same site in the City of London. Mies van der Rohe’s unrealised Mansion House Square and it’sbuilt successor, Number One Poultry by James Stirling, were both commissioned by architectural patron and developer Lord Peter Palumbo and represent a unique opportunity to draw comparisons between the design methods and solutions of two of the most highly regarded architects of the 20th century. The planning history of the two schemes spans over five decades from the 1960s to the 1990s, providing a fascinating insight into a complex and transitional period in the history of British architecture which saw the successive rise and fall of modernism and postmodernism, and the growth of an influential conservation movement. Intended to replace an eclectic block of Victorian listed buildings, both schemes were opposed by heritage groups and subjected to high-profile public inquirie to decide their fate. Debate over the value of Britain’s late twentieth century architectural heritage continues to the present day, with the recent controversial listing of Number One Poultry. |
id |
USJT_5a7f58f345c3a63cb1a40cdc55d1c3ce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/142 |
network_acronym_str |
USJT |
network_name_str |
arq.urb |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James StirlingPasseando pela Praça 1: Mies van der Rohe e James Stirling.LondresExposiçãoLondonExhibitionThis article discusses the RIBA's recent exhibition:Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling which offers a renewed examination of two iconic architectural schemes proposed for the same site in the City of London. Mies van der Rohe’s unrealised Mansion House Square and it’sbuilt successor, Number One Poultry by James Stirling, were both commissioned by architectural patron and developer Lord Peter Palumbo and represent a unique opportunity to draw comparisons between the design methods and solutions of two of the most highly regarded architects of the 20th century. The planning history of the two schemes spans over five decades from the 1960s to the 1990s, providing a fascinating insight into a complex and transitional period in the history of British architecture which saw the successive rise and fall of modernism and postmodernism, and the growth of an influential conservation movement. Intended to replace an eclectic block of Victorian listed buildings, both schemes were opposed by heritage groups and subjected to high-profile public inquirie to decide their fate. Debate over the value of Britain’s late twentieth century architectural heritage continues to the present day, with the recent controversial listing of Number One Poultry.Este artigo discute a recente exposição do RIBA, “Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling”, a qual oferece uma análise renovada de dois projetos arquitetônicos icônicos propostos para o mesmo local na cidade de Londres: o projeto não realizado de Mies van der Rohe, a Mansion House Square, e o seu projeto sucessor, Number One Poultry, o qual foi construído, sendo projetado por James Stirling, e ambos comissionados pelo desenvolvedor e patrocinador arquitetônico Lord Peter Palumbo, o que representa uma oportunidade única para estabelecer comparações entre os métodos de design e as soluções de dois dos mais conceituados arquitetos do século XX. A história do planejamento desses dois projetos abrange mais de cinco décadas, de 1960 até 1990, proporcionando uma visão fascinante de um período de transição complexo na história da arquitetura britânica, que viu a sucessiva ascensão e queda do modernismo e pós-modernismo e o posterior crescimento de um influente movimento de conservação. Destinado a substituir um bloco eclético de edifícios vitorianos, ambos os projetos foram rejeitados por grupos patrimoniais e submetidos a consultas públicas de grande importância que visavam decidir o destino deles. O debate sobre o valor do patrimônio arquitetônico da Grã-Bretanha no final do século XX continua até a atualidade, com a recente e controversa listagem do Number One Poultry.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2019-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142arq.urb; No. 20 (2017): set. - dez.; 65-87arq.urb; Núm. 20 (2017): set. - dez.; 65-87arq.urb; n. 20 (2017): set. - dez.; 65-871984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTporenghttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142/129https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142/130Wilson, Victoria info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-03-26T19:30:22Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/142Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbPRIhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:30:22arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling Passeando pela Praça 1: Mies van der Rohe e James Stirling. |
title |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling |
spellingShingle |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling Wilson, Victoria Londres Exposição London Exhibition |
title_short |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling |
title_full |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling |
title_fullStr |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling |
title_sort |
Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling |
author |
Wilson, Victoria |
author_facet |
Wilson, Victoria |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Wilson, Victoria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Londres Exposição London Exhibition |
topic |
Londres Exposição London Exhibition |
description |
This article discusses the RIBA's recent exhibition:Circling the Square: Mies van der Rohe and James Stirling which offers a renewed examination of two iconic architectural schemes proposed for the same site in the City of London. Mies van der Rohe’s unrealised Mansion House Square and it’sbuilt successor, Number One Poultry by James Stirling, were both commissioned by architectural patron and developer Lord Peter Palumbo and represent a unique opportunity to draw comparisons between the design methods and solutions of two of the most highly regarded architects of the 20th century. The planning history of the two schemes spans over five decades from the 1960s to the 1990s, providing a fascinating insight into a complex and transitional period in the history of British architecture which saw the successive rise and fall of modernism and postmodernism, and the growth of an influential conservation movement. Intended to replace an eclectic block of Victorian listed buildings, both schemes were opposed by heritage groups and subjected to high-profile public inquirie to decide their fate. Debate over the value of Britain’s late twentieth century architectural heritage continues to the present day, with the recent controversial listing of Number One Poultry. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142 |
url |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142/129 https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/142/130 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb; No. 20 (2017): set. - dez.; 65-87 arq.urb; Núm. 20 (2017): set. - dez.; 65-87 arq.urb; n. 20 (2017): set. - dez.; 65-87 1984-5766 reponame:arq.urb instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu instacron:USJT |
instname_str |
Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
instacron_str |
USJT |
institution |
USJT |
reponame_str |
arq.urb |
collection |
arq.urb |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br|| |
_version_ |
1809730427669184512 |