Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bernardino Freitas, José Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: arq.urb
Texto Completo: https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/101
Resumo: The arrival of the Portuguese Royal Family in Brazil and the opening of its Ports to international trade trigger the need for coast to inland surface connections to promote the import and the export of goods. In 1835 Decree no. 101 grants concession to companies of public interest for construction and exploration of railways. In 1866 the province of Ceará, apparently the first to embrace this modality, adopts similar solution as related to its port. The 1869 plan for the improvement of Brazilian ports (Melhoramento de Portos do Brasil) is defined taking into consideration such regime for concessions. This study intends to identify possible relationships between that regime and the land-fills implemented in port areas. As a main reference, it uses the major plans proposed, from the imperial until the early republican period, to two of the most important ports at the time, the port of Rio de Janeiro and the port of Recife. The relevance of this study goes beyond the possible identification of the relationship between theses concessions and the land-fills associated to port activity. It brings up an array of related questions that deserve further examination. These may point towards rather contemporary concerns.
id USJT_e95aaac29870d48bfd6c0bc0b01f1efa
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/101
network_acronym_str USJT
network_name_str arq.urb
repository_id_str
spelling Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fillsPortos e o regime de concessões: construção, exploração e aterrosPortosaterrosconcessões públicasportsland fillingspublic concessionsThe arrival of the Portuguese Royal Family in Brazil and the opening of its Ports to international trade trigger the need for coast to inland surface connections to promote the import and the export of goods. In 1835 Decree no. 101 grants concession to companies of public interest for construction and exploration of railways. In 1866 the province of Ceará, apparently the first to embrace this modality, adopts similar solution as related to its port. The 1869 plan for the improvement of Brazilian ports (Melhoramento de Portos do Brasil) is defined taking into consideration such regime for concessions. This study intends to identify possible relationships between that regime and the land-fills implemented in port areas. As a main reference, it uses the major plans proposed, from the imperial until the early republican period, to two of the most important ports at the time, the port of Rio de Janeiro and the port of Recife. The relevance of this study goes beyond the possible identification of the relationship between theses concessions and the land-fills associated to port activity. It brings up an array of related questions that deserve further examination. These may point towards rather contemporary concerns.Com a chegada da família real e a abertura dos Portos ao comércio exterior, urge a necessidade de extensão de caminhos ao interior do Brasil que facilitassem a exportação ou a importação de produtos. Em 1835, o decreto no. 101 permite o regime de concessão a empresas de interesse público para construção e exploração de estradas de ferro. Em 1866, a província do Ceará, aparentemente a precursora em abraçar a modalidade, adota solução semelhante com relação a seu porto. O plano para Melhoramento de Portos do Brasil de 1869 é construído com base na adoção desse tipo de concessão. Esse estudo pretende identificar possibilidades de relações entre o regime de concessões e os aterros realizados em áreas portuárias. Utiliza como principal fonte de referência os principais planos do período imperial até os primeiros anos da república para dois dos mais importantes portos do Brasil à época, os portos do Rio de Janeiro e do Recife. Destarte, a importância desse estudo não se restringe apenas a possibilidade de se verificar a relação entre esse tipo de concessão e os aterros associados às atividades portuárias. Como resultados das questões que emergem para aprofundamento em investigações futuras, revelam-se preocupações bastante contemporâneas.Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo2010-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/101arq.urb; No. 2 (2010): jan. - abr.; 4-21arq.urb; Núm. 2 (2010): jan. - abr.; 4-21arq.urb; n. 2 (2010): jan. - abr.; 4-211984-5766reponame:arq.urbinstname:Universidade São Judas Tadeuinstacron:USJTporhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/101/87Copyright (c) 2010 José Francisco Bernardino Freitashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernardino Freitas, José Francisco 2021-03-26T19:33:19Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/101Revistahttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurbPRIhttps://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/oairevista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||1984-57661984-5766opendoar:2021-03-26T19:33:19arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeufalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
Portos e o regime de concessões: construção, exploração e aterros
title Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
spellingShingle Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
Bernardino Freitas, José Francisco
Portos
aterros
concessões públicas
ports
land fillings
public concessions
title_short Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
title_full Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
title_fullStr Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
title_full_unstemmed Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
title_sort Ports and the public interest concession regime: construction, explorations and land-fills
author Bernardino Freitas, José Francisco
author_facet Bernardino Freitas, José Francisco
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bernardino Freitas, José Francisco
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Portos
aterros
concessões públicas
ports
land fillings
public concessions
topic Portos
aterros
concessões públicas
ports
land fillings
public concessions
description The arrival of the Portuguese Royal Family in Brazil and the opening of its Ports to international trade trigger the need for coast to inland surface connections to promote the import and the export of goods. In 1835 Decree no. 101 grants concession to companies of public interest for construction and exploration of railways. In 1866 the province of Ceará, apparently the first to embrace this modality, adopts similar solution as related to its port. The 1869 plan for the improvement of Brazilian ports (Melhoramento de Portos do Brasil) is defined taking into consideration such regime for concessions. This study intends to identify possible relationships between that regime and the land-fills implemented in port areas. As a main reference, it uses the major plans proposed, from the imperial until the early republican period, to two of the most important ports at the time, the port of Rio de Janeiro and the port of Recife. The relevance of this study goes beyond the possible identification of the relationship between theses concessions and the land-fills associated to port activity. It brings up an array of related questions that deserve further examination. These may point towards rather contemporary concerns.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/101
url https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaarqurb.com.br/arqurb/article/view/101/87
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2010 José Francisco Bernardino Freitas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2010 José Francisco Bernardino Freitas
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade São Judas Tadeu – Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Arquitetura e Urbanismo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv arq.urb; No. 2 (2010): jan. - abr.; 4-21
arq.urb; Núm. 2 (2010): jan. - abr.; 4-21
arq.urb; n. 2 (2010): jan. - abr.; 4-21
1984-5766
reponame:arq.urb
instname:Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron:USJT
instname_str Universidade São Judas Tadeu
instacron_str USJT
institution USJT
reponame_str arq.urb
collection arq.urb
repository.name.fl_str_mv arq.urb - Universidade São Judas Tadeu
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.arq.urb@saojudas.br||
_version_ 1809730427326300160