Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Alexandre Nascimento de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/144802
Resumo: By utilizing the funds from the Federal University Restructuring and Expansion Plans (REUNI), the University of Brasília (UnB) increased and democratized the number of vacancies, prioritizing the creation of night courses in the poor areas of Brasilia. In this context, the Environmental Management course (GAM) was created at the Faculdade UnB de Planaltina (FUP) in 2008. In its first evaluation by the Ministry of Education (MEC), UnB GAM course achieved grade 4, not far from the maximum mark, which is 5. Research results, however, revealed a high dropout rate and low employability of degree holders, raising doubts about its quality as well as the effectiveness of MEC evaluation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of the UnB GAM course by identifying its strengths and weaknesses through the perception of its former students. To do so, 43 questionnaires were reviewed through cluster analysis. The study revealed that the strengths were associated with the high quality of professors, workers and overall infrastructure of UnB. Weaknesses are found in difficulties inherent to the fact that the course is new and has not yet been recognized by an official professional board. Questions related to the curricular structure of the course, the quality of the laboratories and the library as well as incorporating students in projects of supervised undergraduate research, extension and internships in the respective training area were seen as showing intermediate-level quality.
id USP-11_8d141d2444b66587e490de26ca8ad4aa
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/144802
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of BrasíliaForças e fraquezas do curso de Gestão Ambiental da Universidade de BrasíliaEnvironmental managementFormer studentsInstitutional evaluationGestão ambientalEgressosAvaliação institucional By utilizing the funds from the Federal University Restructuring and Expansion Plans (REUNI), the University of Brasília (UnB) increased and democratized the number of vacancies, prioritizing the creation of night courses in the poor areas of Brasilia. In this context, the Environmental Management course (GAM) was created at the Faculdade UnB de Planaltina (FUP) in 2008. In its first evaluation by the Ministry of Education (MEC), UnB GAM course achieved grade 4, not far from the maximum mark, which is 5. Research results, however, revealed a high dropout rate and low employability of degree holders, raising doubts about its quality as well as the effectiveness of MEC evaluation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of the UnB GAM course by identifying its strengths and weaknesses through the perception of its former students. To do so, 43 questionnaires were reviewed through cluster analysis. The study revealed that the strengths were associated with the high quality of professors, workers and overall infrastructure of UnB. Weaknesses are found in difficulties inherent to the fact that the course is new and has not yet been recognized by an official professional board. Questions related to the curricular structure of the course, the quality of the laboratories and the library as well as incorporating students in projects of supervised undergraduate research, extension and internships in the respective training area were seen as showing intermediate-level quality. Com a aplicação dos recursos do Programa de Apoio a Planos de Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais (REUNI), a Universidade de Brasília (UnB) ampliou e democratizou seu número de vagas, priorizando a criação de cursos noturnos em regiões periféricas de Brasília. Nesse contexto, criou-se o curso de Gestão Ambiental (GAM) na Faculdade UnB de Planaltina (FUP), em 2008. Em sua primeira avaliação pelo Ministério da Educação (MEC), o curso de GAM da UnB alcançou nota 4, aproximando-se da nota máxima, que é 5. Resultados de pesquisa, porém, revelaram uma alta taxa de evasão e uma baixa empregabilidade do curso, levantando dúvidas sobre sua qualidade e a efetividade da avaliação do MEC. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a qualidade do curso de GAM da UnB, identificando seus pontos fortes e fracos por meio da percepção de seus egressos. Para tanto, analisaram-se 43 questionários respondidos por egressos do curso por meio da análise de cluster. O estudo revelou que os pontos fortes estiveram relacionados à alta qualidade dos professores, dos servidores e da infraestrutura geral da UnB. Os pontos fracos referem-se a dificuldades inerentes ao fato de o curso ser novo e ainda não reconhecido por um conselho de classe. Questões relacionadas à grade curricular do curso, à qualidade dos laboratórios e da biblioteca, bem como à inclusão dos alunos em projetos de iniciação cientifica, de extensão e em estágios na área de formação se encontraram com qualidade intermediária.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/14480210.1590/s1678-4634201844166602Educação e Pesquisa; v. 44 (2018); e166602Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 44 (2018); e166602Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 44 (2018); e1666021678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/144802/139045Copyright (c) 2018 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlmeida, Alexandre Nascimento de2018-05-18T13:02:02Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/144802Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2018-05-18T13:02:02Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
Forças e fraquezas do curso de Gestão Ambiental da Universidade de Brasília
title Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
spellingShingle Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
Almeida, Alexandre Nascimento de
Environmental management
Former students
Institutional evaluation
Gestão ambiental
Egressos
Avaliação institucional
title_short Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
title_full Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
title_fullStr Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
title_full_unstemmed Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
title_sort Strengths and weaknesses of the Environmental Management course at the University of Brasília
author Almeida, Alexandre Nascimento de
author_facet Almeida, Alexandre Nascimento de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Alexandre Nascimento de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Environmental management
Former students
Institutional evaluation
Gestão ambiental
Egressos
Avaliação institucional
topic Environmental management
Former students
Institutional evaluation
Gestão ambiental
Egressos
Avaliação institucional
description By utilizing the funds from the Federal University Restructuring and Expansion Plans (REUNI), the University of Brasília (UnB) increased and democratized the number of vacancies, prioritizing the creation of night courses in the poor areas of Brasilia. In this context, the Environmental Management course (GAM) was created at the Faculdade UnB de Planaltina (FUP) in 2008. In its first evaluation by the Ministry of Education (MEC), UnB GAM course achieved grade 4, not far from the maximum mark, which is 5. Research results, however, revealed a high dropout rate and low employability of degree holders, raising doubts about its quality as well as the effectiveness of MEC evaluation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of the UnB GAM course by identifying its strengths and weaknesses through the perception of its former students. To do so, 43 questionnaires were reviewed through cluster analysis. The study revealed that the strengths were associated with the high quality of professors, workers and overall infrastructure of UnB. Weaknesses are found in difficulties inherent to the fact that the course is new and has not yet been recognized by an official professional board. Questions related to the curricular structure of the course, the quality of the laboratories and the library as well as incorporating students in projects of supervised undergraduate research, extension and internships in the respective training area were seen as showing intermediate-level quality.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/144802
10.1590/s1678-4634201844166602
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/144802
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1678-4634201844166602
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/144802/139045
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Educação e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Educação e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 44 (2018); e166602
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 44 (2018); e166602
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 44 (2018); e166602
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713812612251648