Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Educação e Pesquisa |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28200 |
Resumo: | Nowadays we witness a huge proliferation of environmental education projects, but a similar development cannot be observed with respect to the methods employed to evaluate these projects. The present article seeks to contribute to the process by constructing a matrix to evaluate this kind of project. Two projects developed in Petrópolis (RJ) having solid waste as their main issue were taken as test cases. The matrix analyzed the adherence of the projects Araras sem lixo (Waste-free Araras) and Petrópolis recicla (Petrópolis recycles) to the main public policies for the region and to the themes they elected. Thirteen questions were formulated to evaluate whether or not the projects were aligned with the assumptions of the chosen public policies. Each project could achieve a maximum of 39 and a minimum of 13 points overall, and they could be evaluated as: (i) not in accordance with the public policies analyzed (score between 13 and 21); (ii) partly in accordance (between 22 and 30 points); and (iii) in accordance (between 31 and 39 points). According to the assessment made, the Araras sem lixo Project had its principles and objectives partly in accordance with those proposed by the public policies analyzed, whereas the Petrópolis recicla Project turned out to be inadequate to the proposals of those public policies. The assessment matrix was shown to be an adequate instrument to evaluate and later compare projects of environmental education, and it can be adapted to various themes and realities. |
id |
USP-11_a74fc94bb89dba46e55f5e587b081959 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/28200 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-11 |
network_name_str |
Educação e Pesquisa |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects Contribuições para a construção de uma matriz para avaliação de projetos de educação ambiental Educação ambientalAvaliação de projetos de educação ambientalResíduos sólidosPolíticas públicasEnvironmental educationAssessment of environmental education projectsSolid wastePublic policies Nowadays we witness a huge proliferation of environmental education projects, but a similar development cannot be observed with respect to the methods employed to evaluate these projects. The present article seeks to contribute to the process by constructing a matrix to evaluate this kind of project. Two projects developed in Petrópolis (RJ) having solid waste as their main issue were taken as test cases. The matrix analyzed the adherence of the projects Araras sem lixo (Waste-free Araras) and Petrópolis recicla (Petrópolis recycles) to the main public policies for the region and to the themes they elected. Thirteen questions were formulated to evaluate whether or not the projects were aligned with the assumptions of the chosen public policies. Each project could achieve a maximum of 39 and a minimum of 13 points overall, and they could be evaluated as: (i) not in accordance with the public policies analyzed (score between 13 and 21); (ii) partly in accordance (between 22 and 30 points); and (iii) in accordance (between 31 and 39 points). According to the assessment made, the Araras sem lixo Project had its principles and objectives partly in accordance with those proposed by the public policies analyzed, whereas the Petrópolis recicla Project turned out to be inadequate to the proposals of those public policies. The assessment matrix was shown to be an adequate instrument to evaluate and later compare projects of environmental education, and it can be adapted to various themes and realities. Hoje em dia, presenciamos uma grande proliferação de projetos de educação ambiental, mas não se observa esse mesmo desenvolvimento em relação aos métodos para avaliação destes. O presente artigo teve por objetivo colaborar com a construção de uma matriz para avaliação de tais projetos. Foram utilizados, como exemplo de avaliação, dois projetos desenvolvidos no município de Petrópolis (RJ), que apresentam os resíduos sólidos como tema central. A matriz analisou a adequação dos projetos Araras sem lixo e Petrópolis recicla com as principais políticas públicas que regem a região e o tema escolhido. Foram elaboradas 13 questões para avaliar se os projetos estavam ou não de acordo com os propostos pelas políticas públicas escolhidas. No total, cada projeto poderia pontuar um máximo de 39 e um mínimo de 13 pontos, podendo ser avaliados como: (i) não de acordo com as políticas públicas analisadas (pontuação entre 13-21); (ii) parcialmente de acordo (entre 22 e 30 pontos); e (iii) de acordo (entre 31-39 pontos). Segundo a avaliação, o projeto Araras sem lixo tem seus princípios e objetivos parcialmente de acordo com aqueles propostos pelas políticas públicas analisadas. Já o projeto Petrópolis recicla mostrou-se inadequado aos propostos por essas políticas públicas. A matriz de avaliação mostrou ser um instrumento adequado para avaliação e posterior comparação de projetos de educação ambiental, podendo ser adaptada aos mais diferentes temas e realidades. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/2820010.1590/S1517-97022009000200012Educação e Pesquisa; v. 35 n. 2 (2009); 399-411Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2009); 399-411Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 35 Núm. 2 (2009); 399-4111678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28200/30015Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuanabara, RachelGama, ThaisEigenheer, Emílio Maciel2014-10-24T15:46:58Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/28200Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2014-10-24T15:46:58Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects Contribuições para a construção de uma matriz para avaliação de projetos de educação ambiental |
title |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects |
spellingShingle |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects Guanabara, Rachel Educação ambiental Avaliação de projetos de educação ambiental Resíduos sólidos Políticas públicas Environmental education Assessment of environmental education projects Solid waste Public policies |
title_short |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects |
title_full |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects |
title_fullStr |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects |
title_sort |
Contributions to the construction of an assessment matrix for environmental education projects |
author |
Guanabara, Rachel |
author_facet |
Guanabara, Rachel Gama, Thais Eigenheer, Emílio Maciel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Gama, Thais Eigenheer, Emílio Maciel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guanabara, Rachel Gama, Thais Eigenheer, Emílio Maciel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educação ambiental Avaliação de projetos de educação ambiental Resíduos sólidos Políticas públicas Environmental education Assessment of environmental education projects Solid waste Public policies |
topic |
Educação ambiental Avaliação de projetos de educação ambiental Resíduos sólidos Políticas públicas Environmental education Assessment of environmental education projects Solid waste Public policies |
description |
Nowadays we witness a huge proliferation of environmental education projects, but a similar development cannot be observed with respect to the methods employed to evaluate these projects. The present article seeks to contribute to the process by constructing a matrix to evaluate this kind of project. Two projects developed in Petrópolis (RJ) having solid waste as their main issue were taken as test cases. The matrix analyzed the adherence of the projects Araras sem lixo (Waste-free Araras) and Petrópolis recicla (Petrópolis recycles) to the main public policies for the region and to the themes they elected. Thirteen questions were formulated to evaluate whether or not the projects were aligned with the assumptions of the chosen public policies. Each project could achieve a maximum of 39 and a minimum of 13 points overall, and they could be evaluated as: (i) not in accordance with the public policies analyzed (score between 13 and 21); (ii) partly in accordance (between 22 and 30 points); and (iii) in accordance (between 31 and 39 points). According to the assessment made, the Araras sem lixo Project had its principles and objectives partly in accordance with those proposed by the public policies analyzed, whereas the Petrópolis recicla Project turned out to be inadequate to the proposals of those public policies. The assessment matrix was shown to be an adequate instrument to evaluate and later compare projects of environmental education, and it can be adapted to various themes and realities. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28200 10.1590/S1517-97022009000200012 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28200 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-97022009000200012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/28200/30015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação e Pesquisa; v. 35 n. 2 (2009); 399-411 Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 35 No. 2 (2009); 399-411 Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 35 Núm. 2 (2009); 399-411 1678-4634 1517-9702 reponame:Educação e Pesquisa instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Educação e Pesquisa |
collection |
Educação e Pesquisa |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revedu@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713808216621056 |