Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ríos, Liliana María Nieto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ortega, Francisco Javier Ruiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548
Resumo: Argumentation, as an indispensable activity in the construction of science, is also an option in school settings to bring students closer to public understanding of knowledge. The research work developed answers the question: How does the case study, used as a teaching and learning strategy for the theories of the Psychology of Learning, allow the development of argumentative processes in trainee teachers? The main objective is to identify the contribution of the application of the case study as a teaching and learning strategy of the Psychology of Learning to the development of the argumentative processes of trainee teachers of the Higher Normal School of Quindío. To respond to this objective, the didactic intervention was designed which constituted: 1) characterize the argumentative processes of the students, having as reference the Toulminian Model of Argumentation and the Argumentative Levels of Osborne (OSBORNE, 2009); 2) incorporate the case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation into the teaching processes of the Psychology of Learning; 3) characterize, after the application of the case study in Theories of Learning, the changes that occur in the argumentative levels of the students, again referenced in Toulmin and Osborne (TOULMIN, 2007; OSBORNE, 2009). Research work that, in addition to allowing us to understand that learning to argue is also learning to think, also supported learning processes on disciplinary issues in the area of the Psychology of Learning.
id USP-11_d998d64c2d50d5254a70cd34126d7790
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/170548
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachersEstudio de caso como estrategia para el desarrollo de la argumentación en docentes en formaciónArgumentationCase studyProblem solvingPsychology of learningTrainee teacherArgumentaciónEstudio de casoResolución de problemasPsicología del aprendizajeMaestro en formaciónArgumentation, as an indispensable activity in the construction of science, is also an option in school settings to bring students closer to public understanding of knowledge. The research work developed answers the question: How does the case study, used as a teaching and learning strategy for the theories of the Psychology of Learning, allow the development of argumentative processes in trainee teachers? The main objective is to identify the contribution of the application of the case study as a teaching and learning strategy of the Psychology of Learning to the development of the argumentative processes of trainee teachers of the Higher Normal School of Quindío. To respond to this objective, the didactic intervention was designed which constituted: 1) characterize the argumentative processes of the students, having as reference the Toulminian Model of Argumentation and the Argumentative Levels of Osborne (OSBORNE, 2009); 2) incorporate the case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation into the teaching processes of the Psychology of Learning; 3) characterize, after the application of the case study in Theories of Learning, the changes that occur in the argumentative levels of the students, again referenced in Toulmin and Osborne (TOULMIN, 2007; OSBORNE, 2009). Research work that, in addition to allowing us to understand that learning to argue is also learning to think, also supported learning processes on disciplinary issues in the area of the Psychology of Learning.La argumentación, como actividad indispensable en la construcción de la ciencia, es también una opción en los escenarios escolares para acercar a los estudiantes a la comprensión pública del conocimiento. El trabajo de indagación desarrollado responde a la pregunta: ¿Cómo el estudio de casos, utilizado como estrategia de enseñanza y aprendizaje de las teorías de Psicología del Aprendizaje, permite el desarrollo de los procesos argumentativos en los maestros en formación? El objetivo central es identificar el aporte de la aplicación del estudio de casos como estrategia de enseñanza y aprendizaje de la Psicología del Aprendizaje al desarrollo de los procesos argumentativos de los docentes en formación de la Escuela Normal Superior del Quindío. Para dar respuesta a este objetivo se diseñó la intervención didáctica que constituyó: 1) caracterizar los procesos argumentativos de los estudiantes, teniendo como referente el Modelo Toulminiano de Argumentación y los Niveles Argumentativos de Osborne (OSBORNE, 2009); 2) incorporar a los procesos de enseñanza de la Psicología del Aprendizaje el estudio de casos como estrategia para el desarrollo de la argumentación; 3) caracterizar, tras la aplicación del estudio de caso en Teorías del Aprendizaje, los cambios que se dan en los niveles argumentativos de los estudiantes, nuevamente referenciados en Toulmin y Osborne (TOULMIN, 2007; OSBORNE, 2009). Este trabajo investigativo, además de permitir comprender que aprender a argumentar es también aprender a pensar, también apoyó procesos de aprendizaje sobre temas disciplinares en el área de la Psicología del Aprendizaje.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2021-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/17054810.1590/s1678-4634202046216221Educação e Pesquisa; v. 46 (2020); e216221Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e216221Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e2162211678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPspahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548/161089https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548/161090Copyright (c) 2020 Educação e Pesquisahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRíos, Liliana María NietoOrtega, Francisco Javier Ruiz2021-06-14T21:56:24Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/170548Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2021-06-14T21:56:24Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
Estudio de caso como estrategia para el desarrollo de la argumentación en docentes en formación
title Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
spellingShingle Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
Ríos, Liliana María Nieto
Argumentation
Case study
Problem solving
Psychology of learning
Trainee teacher
Argumentación
Estudio de caso
Resolución de problemas
Psicología del aprendizaje
Maestro en formación
title_short Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
title_full Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
title_fullStr Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
title_full_unstemmed Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
title_sort Case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation in trainee teachers
author Ríos, Liliana María Nieto
author_facet Ríos, Liliana María Nieto
Ortega, Francisco Javier Ruiz
author_role author
author2 Ortega, Francisco Javier Ruiz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ríos, Liliana María Nieto
Ortega, Francisco Javier Ruiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumentation
Case study
Problem solving
Psychology of learning
Trainee teacher
Argumentación
Estudio de caso
Resolución de problemas
Psicología del aprendizaje
Maestro en formación
topic Argumentation
Case study
Problem solving
Psychology of learning
Trainee teacher
Argumentación
Estudio de caso
Resolución de problemas
Psicología del aprendizaje
Maestro en formación
description Argumentation, as an indispensable activity in the construction of science, is also an option in school settings to bring students closer to public understanding of knowledge. The research work developed answers the question: How does the case study, used as a teaching and learning strategy for the theories of the Psychology of Learning, allow the development of argumentative processes in trainee teachers? The main objective is to identify the contribution of the application of the case study as a teaching and learning strategy of the Psychology of Learning to the development of the argumentative processes of trainee teachers of the Higher Normal School of Quindío. To respond to this objective, the didactic intervention was designed which constituted: 1) characterize the argumentative processes of the students, having as reference the Toulminian Model of Argumentation and the Argumentative Levels of Osborne (OSBORNE, 2009); 2) incorporate the case study as a strategy for the development of argumentation into the teaching processes of the Psychology of Learning; 3) characterize, after the application of the case study in Theories of Learning, the changes that occur in the argumentative levels of the students, again referenced in Toulmin and Osborne (TOULMIN, 2007; OSBORNE, 2009). Research work that, in addition to allowing us to understand that learning to argue is also learning to think, also supported learning processes on disciplinary issues in the area of the Psychology of Learning.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548
10.1590/s1678-4634202046216221
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/s1678-4634202046216221
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548/161089
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/170548/161090
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação e Pesquisa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Educação e Pesquisa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 46 (2020); e216221
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e216221
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 46 (2020); e216221
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713813654536192