Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone. |
id |
USP-17_45911106286fee269283dc1c198626b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-77572010000400016 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog boneImplant surfacePrimary stabilityBone qualityHistomorphometryResonance frequency analysisOBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2010-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016Journal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.4 2010reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKim,Sun-JongKim,Myung-RaeRim,Jae-SukChung,Sung-MinShin,Sang-Waneng2010-09-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572010000400016Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2010-09-01T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
title |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone Kim,Sun-Jong Implant surface Primary stability Bone quality Histomorphometry Resonance frequency analysis |
title_short |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
title_full |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
title_sort |
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone |
author |
Kim,Sun-Jong |
author_facet |
Kim,Sun-Jong Kim,Myung-Rae Rim,Jae-Suk Chung,Sung-Min Shin,Sang-Wan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kim,Myung-Rae Rim,Jae-Suk Chung,Sung-Min Shin,Sang-Wan |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kim,Sun-Jong Kim,Myung-Rae Rim,Jae-Suk Chung,Sung-Min Shin,Sang-Wan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Implant surface Primary stability Bone quality Histomorphometry Resonance frequency analysis |
topic |
Implant surface Primary stability Bone quality Histomorphometry Resonance frequency analysis |
description |
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.4 2010 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936436122386432 |