Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kim,Sun-Jong
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Kim,Myung-Rae, Rim,Jae-Suk, Chung,Sung-Min, Shin,Sang-Wan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.
id USP-17_45911106286fee269283dc1c198626b6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-77572010000400016
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog boneImplant surfacePrimary stabilityBone qualityHistomorphometryResonance frequency analysisOBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2010-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016Journal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.4 2010reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKim,Sun-JongKim,Myung-RaeRim,Jae-SukChung,Sung-MinShin,Sang-Waneng2010-09-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572010000400016Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2010-09-01T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
spellingShingle Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
Kim,Sun-Jong
Implant surface
Primary stability
Bone quality
Histomorphometry
Resonance frequency analysis
title_short Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_full Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_fullStr Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
title_sort Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
author Kim,Sun-Jong
author_facet Kim,Sun-Jong
Kim,Myung-Rae
Rim,Jae-Suk
Chung,Sung-Min
Shin,Sang-Wan
author_role author
author2 Kim,Myung-Rae
Rim,Jae-Suk
Chung,Sung-Min
Shin,Sang-Wan
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kim,Sun-Jong
Kim,Myung-Rae
Rim,Jae-Suk
Chung,Sung-Min
Shin,Sang-Wan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Implant surface
Primary stability
Bone quality
Histomorphometry
Resonance frequency analysis
topic Implant surface
Primary stability
Bone quality
Histomorphometry
Resonance frequency analysis
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An OsstellTM resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000400016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572010000400016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.4 2010
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1748936436122386432