Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/106981 |
Resumo: | Objectives To evaluate the microbial contamination of pacifiers by Mutans Streptococci(MS) and the efficacy of different methods for their disinfection.Methods Twenty-eight children were assigned to a 4-stage changeover system with a 1-week interval. In each stage, children received a new pacifier and the parents were instructed to maintain their normal habits for 1 week. After this time, the pacifiers were subjected to the following 4 disinfection methods: spraying with 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, Brushtox® or sterile tap water, and immersion in boiling tap water for 15 minutes. Microbiological culture for MS and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were performed. The results were analyzed statistically by Friedman’s non-parametric test (a=0.05).Results The 0.12% chlorhexidine spray was statistically similar to the boiling water (p>;0.05) and more effective than the Brushtox®spray and control (p |
id |
USP-17_477b82c1bcdf1f8fbdaededff34d8f47 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/106981 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers Objectives To evaluate the microbial contamination of pacifiers by Mutans Streptococci(MS) and the efficacy of different methods for their disinfection.Methods Twenty-eight children were assigned to a 4-stage changeover system with a 1-week interval. In each stage, children received a new pacifier and the parents were instructed to maintain their normal habits for 1 week. After this time, the pacifiers were subjected to the following 4 disinfection methods: spraying with 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, Brushtox® or sterile tap water, and immersion in boiling tap water for 15 minutes. Microbiological culture for MS and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were performed. The results were analyzed statistically by Friedman’s non-parametric test (a=0.05).Results The 0.12% chlorhexidine spray was statistically similar to the boiling water (p>;0.05) and more effective than the Brushtox®spray and control (pUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2015-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/10698110.1590/1678-775720150244Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2015); 523-528Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2015); 523-528Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 23 n. 5 (2015); 523-5281678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/106981/105553Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNELSON-FILHO, PauloLOUVAIN, Márcia CostaMACARI, SoraiaLUCISANO, Marília PacíficoSILVA, Raquel Assed Bezerra daQUEIROZ, Alexandra Mussolino deGATON-HERNÁNDEZ, PatríciaSILVA, Léa Assed Bezerra da2015-11-03T11:46:22Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/106981Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2015-11-03T11:46:22Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
title |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
spellingShingle |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers NELSON-FILHO, Paulo |
title_short |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
title_full |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
title_fullStr |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
title_sort |
Microbial contamination and disinfection methods of pacifiers |
author |
NELSON-FILHO, Paulo |
author_facet |
NELSON-FILHO, Paulo LOUVAIN, Márcia Costa MACARI, Soraia LUCISANO, Marília Pacífico SILVA, Raquel Assed Bezerra da QUEIROZ, Alexandra Mussolino de GATON-HERNÁNDEZ, Patrícia SILVA, Léa Assed Bezerra da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LOUVAIN, Márcia Costa MACARI, Soraia LUCISANO, Marília Pacífico SILVA, Raquel Assed Bezerra da QUEIROZ, Alexandra Mussolino de GATON-HERNÁNDEZ, Patrícia SILVA, Léa Assed Bezerra da |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
NELSON-FILHO, Paulo LOUVAIN, Márcia Costa MACARI, Soraia LUCISANO, Marília Pacífico SILVA, Raquel Assed Bezerra da QUEIROZ, Alexandra Mussolino de GATON-HERNÁNDEZ, Patrícia SILVA, Léa Assed Bezerra da |
description |
Objectives To evaluate the microbial contamination of pacifiers by Mutans Streptococci(MS) and the efficacy of different methods for their disinfection.Methods Twenty-eight children were assigned to a 4-stage changeover system with a 1-week interval. In each stage, children received a new pacifier and the parents were instructed to maintain their normal habits for 1 week. After this time, the pacifiers were subjected to the following 4 disinfection methods: spraying with 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, Brushtox® or sterile tap water, and immersion in boiling tap water for 15 minutes. Microbiological culture for MS and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) were performed. The results were analyzed statistically by Friedman’s non-parametric test (a=0.05).Results The 0.12% chlorhexidine spray was statistically similar to the boiling water (p>;0.05) and more effective than the Brushtox®spray and control (p |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/106981 10.1590/1678-775720150244 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/106981 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-775720150244 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/106981/105553 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 No. 5 (2015); 523-528 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 23 Núm. 5 (2015); 523-528 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 23 n. 5 (2015); 523-528 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221678860500992 |