Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Keestra, Johan Anton Jochum
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Barry, Obada, Jong, Lianne de, Wahl, Gerhard
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/112870
Resumo: Extraction, periodontitis, or trauma can cause a reduction on the alveolar ridge. This could result in an insufficient alveolar bone width and height. Different techniques of vertical bone augmentation are described in literature. However, nowadays there is not enough evidence against lateral augmentation procedures to verify if these techniques are stable over a long period of time. Objective This review analyses the different techniques that are used to vertically augment the bone and evaluate if these techniques are stable over a long period of time. Material and Methods The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from its earliest records until December 22, 2014. The following search term was used: Alveolar Ridge augmentation [MESH]. Several journals were hand searched and some authors were contacted for additional information. The primary outcome measure that was analyzed was marginal bone level change around dental implants in the augmented sites, and the secondary outcomes were survival and success rates of dental implants placed in the augmented sites. Results The search yielded 203 abstracts. Ultimately, 90 articles were selected, describing 51 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The marginal bone level change for the inlay technique and vertical guided bone regeneration are in agreement with the success criteria. Alveolar distraction showed more marginal bone level change after the first year of loading, and for the inlay technique very few studies were available. Conclusions Based on the available data in the current existing studies with a follow-up period of at least 4 to 5 years, one can summarize that there seems to be a trend that the onlay technique, alveolar distraction, and vertical guided bone regeneration are stable for at least 4 to 5 years.
id USP-17_4a53ca3b9987d33b8648af9b2beb44aa
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/112870
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review Extraction, periodontitis, or trauma can cause a reduction on the alveolar ridge. This could result in an insufficient alveolar bone width and height. Different techniques of vertical bone augmentation are described in literature. However, nowadays there is not enough evidence against lateral augmentation procedures to verify if these techniques are stable over a long period of time. Objective This review analyses the different techniques that are used to vertically augment the bone and evaluate if these techniques are stable over a long period of time. Material and Methods The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from its earliest records until December 22, 2014. The following search term was used: Alveolar Ridge augmentation [MESH]. Several journals were hand searched and some authors were contacted for additional information. The primary outcome measure that was analyzed was marginal bone level change around dental implants in the augmented sites, and the secondary outcomes were survival and success rates of dental implants placed in the augmented sites. Results The search yielded 203 abstracts. Ultimately, 90 articles were selected, describing 51 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The marginal bone level change for the inlay technique and vertical guided bone regeneration are in agreement with the success criteria. Alveolar distraction showed more marginal bone level change after the first year of loading, and for the inlay technique very few studies were available. Conclusions Based on the available data in the current existing studies with a follow-up period of at least 4 to 5 years, one can summarize that there seems to be a trend that the onlay technique, alveolar distraction, and vertical guided bone regeneration are stable for at least 4 to 5 years. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/11287010.1590/1678-775720150357Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2016); 3-17Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2016); 3-17Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 24 n. 1 (2016); 3-171678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/112870/110811Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKeestra, Johan Anton JochumBarry, Obada Jong, Lianne deWahl, Gerhard 2016-03-23T18:16:02Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/112870Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2016-03-23T18:16:02Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
title Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
spellingShingle Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
Keestra, Johan Anton Jochum
title_short Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
title_full Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
title_sort Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review
author Keestra, Johan Anton Jochum
author_facet Keestra, Johan Anton Jochum
Barry, Obada
Jong, Lianne de
Wahl, Gerhard
author_role author
author2 Barry, Obada
Jong, Lianne de
Wahl, Gerhard
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Keestra, Johan Anton Jochum
Barry, Obada
Jong, Lianne de
Wahl, Gerhard
description Extraction, periodontitis, or trauma can cause a reduction on the alveolar ridge. This could result in an insufficient alveolar bone width and height. Different techniques of vertical bone augmentation are described in literature. However, nowadays there is not enough evidence against lateral augmentation procedures to verify if these techniques are stable over a long period of time. Objective This review analyses the different techniques that are used to vertically augment the bone and evaluate if these techniques are stable over a long period of time. Material and Methods The MEDLINE-PubMed database was searched from its earliest records until December 22, 2014. The following search term was used: Alveolar Ridge augmentation [MESH]. Several journals were hand searched and some authors were contacted for additional information. The primary outcome measure that was analyzed was marginal bone level change around dental implants in the augmented sites, and the secondary outcomes were survival and success rates of dental implants placed in the augmented sites. Results The search yielded 203 abstracts. Ultimately, 90 articles were selected, describing 51 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The marginal bone level change for the inlay technique and vertical guided bone regeneration are in agreement with the success criteria. Alveolar distraction showed more marginal bone level change after the first year of loading, and for the inlay technique very few studies were available. Conclusions Based on the available data in the current existing studies with a follow-up period of at least 4 to 5 years, one can summarize that there seems to be a trend that the onlay technique, alveolar distraction, and vertical guided bone regeneration are stable for at least 4 to 5 years.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/112870
10.1590/1678-775720150357
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/112870
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1678-775720150357
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/112870/110811
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 No. 1 (2016); 3-17
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 24 Núm. 1 (2016); 3-17
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 24 n. 1 (2016); 3-17
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221679587164160