Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
DOI: | 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0220 |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/143543 |
Resumo: | Coated archwires and ceramic brackets have been developed to improve facial esthetics during orthodontic treatment. However, their mechanical behavior has been shown to be different from metallic archwires and brackets. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the deflection forces in coated nickel-titanium (NiTi) and esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets. Material and Methods Non-coated NiTi (NC), rhodium coated NiTi (RC), teflon coated NiTi (TC), epoxy coated NiTi (EC), fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), and the three different conventional brackets metal-insert polycrystalline ceramic (MI-PC), polycrystalline ceramic (PC) and monocrystalline ceramic (MC) were used. The specimens were set up on a clinical simulation device and evaluated in a Universal Testing Machine (Instron). An acrylic device, representative of the right maxillary central incisor was buccolingually activated and the unloading forces generated were recorded at 3, 2, 1 and 0.5 mm. The speed of the testing machine was 2 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to compare the different archwires and brackets. Results The brackets presented the following decreasing force ranking: monocrystalline, polycrystalline and polycrystalline metal-insert. The decreasing force ranking of the archwires was: rhodium coated NiTi (RC), non-coated NiTi (NC), teflon coated NiTi (TC), epoxy coated NiTi (EC) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP). At 3 mm of unloading the FRP archwire had a plastic deformation and produced an extremely low force in 2; 1 and 0.5 mm of unloading. Conclusion Combinations of the evaluated archwires and brackets will produce a force ranking proportional to the combination of their individual force rankings. |
id |
USP-17_9312ebce91c0f74ef40657bd4175a4bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/143543 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
spelling |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic bracketsOrthodontic archwiresOrthodontic bracketsEstheticsCoatingCoated archwires and ceramic brackets have been developed to improve facial esthetics during orthodontic treatment. However, their mechanical behavior has been shown to be different from metallic archwires and brackets. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the deflection forces in coated nickel-titanium (NiTi) and esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets. Material and Methods Non-coated NiTi (NC), rhodium coated NiTi (RC), teflon coated NiTi (TC), epoxy coated NiTi (EC), fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), and the three different conventional brackets metal-insert polycrystalline ceramic (MI-PC), polycrystalline ceramic (PC) and monocrystalline ceramic (MC) were used. The specimens were set up on a clinical simulation device and evaluated in a Universal Testing Machine (Instron). An acrylic device, representative of the right maxillary central incisor was buccolingually activated and the unloading forces generated were recorded at 3, 2, 1 and 0.5 mm. The speed of the testing machine was 2 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to compare the different archwires and brackets. Results The brackets presented the following decreasing force ranking: monocrystalline, polycrystalline and polycrystalline metal-insert. The decreasing force ranking of the archwires was: rhodium coated NiTi (RC), non-coated NiTi (NC), teflon coated NiTi (TC), epoxy coated NiTi (EC) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP). At 3 mm of unloading the FRP archwire had a plastic deformation and produced an extremely low force in 2; 1 and 0.5 mm of unloading. Conclusion Combinations of the evaluated archwires and brackets will produce a force ranking proportional to the combination of their individual force rankings.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/14354310.1590/1678-7757-2017-0220Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170220Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170220Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 26 (2018); e201702201678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/143543/138233Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMATIAS, MuriloFREITAS, Marcos Roberto deFREITAS, Karina Maria Salvatore deJANSON, GuilhermeHIGA, Rodrigo HitoshiFRANCISCONI, Manoela Fávaro2018-03-20T12:30:06Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/143543Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2018-03-20T12:30:06Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
title |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets MATIAS, Murilo Orthodontic archwires Orthodontic brackets Esthetics Coating MATIAS, Murilo Orthodontic archwires Orthodontic brackets Esthetics Coating |
title_short |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
title_full |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
title_sort |
Comparison of deflection forces of esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets |
author |
MATIAS, Murilo |
author_facet |
MATIAS, Murilo MATIAS, Murilo FREITAS, Marcos Roberto de FREITAS, Karina Maria Salvatore de JANSON, Guilherme HIGA, Rodrigo Hitoshi FRANCISCONI, Manoela Fávaro FREITAS, Marcos Roberto de FREITAS, Karina Maria Salvatore de JANSON, Guilherme HIGA, Rodrigo Hitoshi FRANCISCONI, Manoela Fávaro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
FREITAS, Marcos Roberto de FREITAS, Karina Maria Salvatore de JANSON, Guilherme HIGA, Rodrigo Hitoshi FRANCISCONI, Manoela Fávaro |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MATIAS, Murilo FREITAS, Marcos Roberto de FREITAS, Karina Maria Salvatore de JANSON, Guilherme HIGA, Rodrigo Hitoshi FRANCISCONI, Manoela Fávaro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Orthodontic archwires Orthodontic brackets Esthetics Coating |
topic |
Orthodontic archwires Orthodontic brackets Esthetics Coating |
description |
Coated archwires and ceramic brackets have been developed to improve facial esthetics during orthodontic treatment. However, their mechanical behavior has been shown to be different from metallic archwires and brackets. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the deflection forces in coated nickel-titanium (NiTi) and esthetic archwires combined with ceramic brackets. Material and Methods Non-coated NiTi (NC), rhodium coated NiTi (RC), teflon coated NiTi (TC), epoxy coated NiTi (EC), fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), and the three different conventional brackets metal-insert polycrystalline ceramic (MI-PC), polycrystalline ceramic (PC) and monocrystalline ceramic (MC) were used. The specimens were set up on a clinical simulation device and evaluated in a Universal Testing Machine (Instron). An acrylic device, representative of the right maxillary central incisor was buccolingually activated and the unloading forces generated were recorded at 3, 2, 1 and 0.5 mm. The speed of the testing machine was 2 mm/min. ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to compare the different archwires and brackets. Results The brackets presented the following decreasing force ranking: monocrystalline, polycrystalline and polycrystalline metal-insert. The decreasing force ranking of the archwires was: rhodium coated NiTi (RC), non-coated NiTi (NC), teflon coated NiTi (TC), epoxy coated NiTi (EC) and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP). At 3 mm of unloading the FRP archwire had a plastic deformation and produced an extremely low force in 2; 1 and 0.5 mm of unloading. Conclusion Combinations of the evaluated archwires and brackets will produce a force ranking proportional to the combination of their individual force rankings. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/143543 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0220 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/143543 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0220 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/143543/138233 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170220 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 26 (2018); e20170220 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 26 (2018); e20170220 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1822179118241808384 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0220 |