Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000100004 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeatedly digitized in order to determine the variability of pixel values given to the image throughout the digitization process. One coefficient value was obtained and was called pixel value reproducibility. RESULTS: A significant difference in pixel values was observed among the three devices for the digitized images (ANOVA, p<0.00001). There was significant pixel value variability at the same digitization conditions for one scanner and the digital camera. CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices may assign pixel values differently in consecutive digitization depending on the optical density of the radiographic image and the equipment. The pixel value reproducibility was not satisfactory as tested for two devices. It is maybe advisable knowing the digitization variations regarding pixel values whenever using digital radiography images in longitudinal clinical examinations. |
id |
USP-17_a23e93604577183bc3bd6a1143adf3c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1678-77572007000100004 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital imagesDigital imageRadiographic imageCharge-coupled deviceDigital cameraScannerOBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeatedly digitized in order to determine the variability of pixel values given to the image throughout the digitization process. One coefficient value was obtained and was called pixel value reproducibility. RESULTS: A significant difference in pixel values was observed among the three devices for the digitized images (ANOVA, p<0.00001). There was significant pixel value variability at the same digitization conditions for one scanner and the digital camera. CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices may assign pixel values differently in consecutive digitization depending on the optical density of the radiographic image and the equipment. The pixel value reproducibility was not satisfactory as tested for two devices. It is maybe advisable knowing the digitization variations regarding pixel values whenever using digital radiography images in longitudinal clinical examinations.Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP2007-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000100004Journal of Applied Oral Science v.15 n.1 2007reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S1678-77572007000100004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRubia-Bullen,Izabel Regina FischerEscarpinati,Maurício CunhaSchiabel,HomeroVieira,Marcelo Andrade da CostaRubira,Cássia Maria FischerLauris,José Roberto Pereiraeng2007-05-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-77572007000100004Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2007-05-08T00:00Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
title |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
spellingShingle |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images Rubia-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer Digital image Radiographic image Charge-coupled device Digital camera Scanner |
title_short |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
title_full |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
title_fullStr |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
title_sort |
Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
author |
Rubia-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer |
author_facet |
Rubia-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha Schiabel,Homero Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa Rubira,Cássia Maria Fischer Lauris,José Roberto Pereira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha Schiabel,Homero Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa Rubira,Cássia Maria Fischer Lauris,José Roberto Pereira |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rubia-Bullen,Izabel Regina Fischer Escarpinati,Maurício Cunha Schiabel,Homero Vieira,Marcelo Andrade da Costa Rubira,Cássia Maria Fischer Lauris,José Roberto Pereira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Digital image Radiographic image Charge-coupled device Digital camera Scanner |
topic |
Digital image Radiographic image Charge-coupled device Digital camera Scanner |
description |
OBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeatedly digitized in order to determine the variability of pixel values given to the image throughout the digitization process. One coefficient value was obtained and was called pixel value reproducibility. RESULTS: A significant difference in pixel values was observed among the three devices for the digitized images (ANOVA, p<0.00001). There was significant pixel value variability at the same digitization conditions for one scanner and the digital camera. CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices may assign pixel values differently in consecutive digitization depending on the optical density of the radiographic image and the equipment. The pixel value reproducibility was not satisfactory as tested for two devices. It is maybe advisable knowing the digitization variations regarding pixel values whenever using digital radiography images in longitudinal clinical examinations. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000100004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000100004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572007000100004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science v.15 n.1 2007 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936434382798848 |