Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Rosana Aparecida
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Araujo, Paulo Amarante de, Castañeda-Espinosa, Juan Carlos, Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3534
Resumo: The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage stress of composite resins by three methods. In the first method, composites were inserted between two stainless steel plates. One of the plates was connected to a 20 kgf load cell of a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL-500). In the second method, disk-shaped cavities were prepared in 2-mm-thick Teflon molds and filled with the different composites. Gaps between the composites and molds formed after polymerization were evaluated microscopically. In the third method, the wall-to-wall shrinkage stress of the resins that were placed in bovine dentin cavities was evaluated. The gaps were measured microscopically. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). The obtained contraction forces were: Grandio = 12.18 ± 0.428N; Filtek Z 250 = 11.80 ± 0.760N; Filtek Supreme = 11.80 ± 0.707 N; and Admira = 11.89 ± 0.647 N. The gaps obtained between composites and Teflon molds were: Filtek Z 250 = 0.51 ± 0.0357%; Filtek Supreme = 0.36 ± 0.0438%; Admira = 0.25 ± 0.0346% and Grandio = 0.16 ± 0.008%. The gaps obtained in wall-to-wall contraction were: Filtek Z 250 = 11.33 ± 2.160 µm; Filtek Supreme = 10.66 ± 1.211µm; Admira = 11.16 ± 2.041 µm and Grandio = 10.50 ± 1.224 µm. There were no significant differences among the composite resins obtained with the first (shrinkage stress generated during polymerization) and third method (wall-to-wall shrinkage). The composite resins obtained with the second method (Teflon method) differed significantly regarding gap formation.
id USP-17_f2fdff485fe2d70ba91caa2c059950dc
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3534
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins Composite resinsShrinkage stressPolymerizationPolymerization contraction The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage stress of composite resins by three methods. In the first method, composites were inserted between two stainless steel plates. One of the plates was connected to a 20 kgf load cell of a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL-500). In the second method, disk-shaped cavities were prepared in 2-mm-thick Teflon molds and filled with the different composites. Gaps between the composites and molds formed after polymerization were evaluated microscopically. In the third method, the wall-to-wall shrinkage stress of the resins that were placed in bovine dentin cavities was evaluated. The gaps were measured microscopically. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). The obtained contraction forces were: Grandio = 12.18 ± 0.428N; Filtek Z 250 = 11.80 ± 0.760N; Filtek Supreme = 11.80 ± 0.707 N; and Admira = 11.89 ± 0.647 N. The gaps obtained between composites and Teflon molds were: Filtek Z 250 = 0.51 ± 0.0357%; Filtek Supreme = 0.36 ± 0.0438%; Admira = 0.25 ± 0.0346% and Grandio = 0.16 ± 0.008%. The gaps obtained in wall-to-wall contraction were: Filtek Z 250 = 11.33 ± 2.160 µm; Filtek Supreme = 10.66 ± 1.211µm; Admira = 11.16 ± 2.041 µm and Grandio = 10.50 ± 1.224 µm. There were no significant differences among the composite resins obtained with the first (shrinkage stress generated during polymerization) and third method (wall-to-wall shrinkage). The composite resins obtained with the second method (Teflon method) differed significantly regarding gap formation. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2008-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/353410.1590/S1678-77572008000100007Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2008); 30-34 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2008); 30-34 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 16 n. 1 (2008); 30-34 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3534/4224Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Rosana AparecidaAraujo, Paulo Amarante deCastañeda-Espinosa, Juan CarlosMondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia2012-04-27T11:59:47Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3534Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:59:47Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
title Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
Pereira, Rosana Aparecida
Composite resins
Shrinkage stress
Polymerization
Polymerization contraction
title_short Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
title_full Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
title_sort Comparative analysis of the shrinkage stress of composite resins
author Pereira, Rosana Aparecida
author_facet Pereira, Rosana Aparecida
Araujo, Paulo Amarante de
Castañeda-Espinosa, Juan Carlos
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
author_role author
author2 Araujo, Paulo Amarante de
Castañeda-Espinosa, Juan Carlos
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Rosana Aparecida
Araujo, Paulo Amarante de
Castañeda-Espinosa, Juan Carlos
Mondelli, Rafael Francisco Lia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Composite resins
Shrinkage stress
Polymerization
Polymerization contraction
topic Composite resins
Shrinkage stress
Polymerization
Polymerization contraction
description The aim of this study was to compare the shrinkage stress of composite resins by three methods. In the first method, composites were inserted between two stainless steel plates. One of the plates was connected to a 20 kgf load cell of a universal testing machine (EMIC-DL-500). In the second method, disk-shaped cavities were prepared in 2-mm-thick Teflon molds and filled with the different composites. Gaps between the composites and molds formed after polymerization were evaluated microscopically. In the third method, the wall-to-wall shrinkage stress of the resins that were placed in bovine dentin cavities was evaluated. The gaps were measured microscopically. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). The obtained contraction forces were: Grandio = 12.18 ± 0.428N; Filtek Z 250 = 11.80 ± 0.760N; Filtek Supreme = 11.80 ± 0.707 N; and Admira = 11.89 ± 0.647 N. The gaps obtained between composites and Teflon molds were: Filtek Z 250 = 0.51 ± 0.0357%; Filtek Supreme = 0.36 ± 0.0438%; Admira = 0.25 ± 0.0346% and Grandio = 0.16 ± 0.008%. The gaps obtained in wall-to-wall contraction were: Filtek Z 250 = 11.33 ± 2.160 µm; Filtek Supreme = 10.66 ± 1.211µm; Admira = 11.16 ± 2.041 µm and Grandio = 10.50 ± 1.224 µm. There were no significant differences among the composite resins obtained with the first (shrinkage stress generated during polymerization) and third method (wall-to-wall shrinkage). The composite resins obtained with the second method (Teflon method) differed significantly regarding gap formation.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3534
10.1590/S1678-77572008000100007
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3534
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572008000100007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3534/4224
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2008 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2008); 30-34
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 16 Núm. 1 (2008); 30-34
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 16 n. 1 (2008); 30-34
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1800221673889202176