Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Pinho,Sheila Zambello de, Mischan,Martha Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014
Resumo: In biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood ratio method; and (iii) constructing a pooled variance from individual variances. The parametric tests, F and Tukey, were employed when the parameter estimators were near to present the properties of linear model estimators, that is, unbiasedness, normal distribution and minimum variance. The first and second methods presented similar results, but the third method is simpler in calculations and uses all information contained in the original data.
id USP-18_09bdb4cbb824b82a5593fdc6ba709fdd
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-90162010000200014
network_acronym_str USP-18
network_name_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression modelslogistic modeltreatments comparisonIn biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood ratio method; and (iii) constructing a pooled variance from individual variances. The parametric tests, F and Tukey, were employed when the parameter estimators were near to present the properties of linear model estimators, that is, unbiasedness, normal distribution and minimum variance. The first and second methods presented similar results, but the third method is simpler in calculations and uses all information contained in the original data.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014Scientia Agricola v.67 n.2 2010reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0103-90162010000200014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Lídia Raquel dePinho,Sheila Zambello deMischan,Martha Mariaeng2010-04-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162010000200014Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2010-04-26T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
title Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
spellingShingle Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de
logistic model
treatments comparison
title_short Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
title_full Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
title_fullStr Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
title_full_unstemmed Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
title_sort Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
author Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de
author_facet Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de
Pinho,Sheila Zambello de
Mischan,Martha Maria
author_role author
author2 Pinho,Sheila Zambello de
Mischan,Martha Maria
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de
Pinho,Sheila Zambello de
Mischan,Martha Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv logistic model
treatments comparison
topic logistic model
treatments comparison
description In biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood ratio method; and (iii) constructing a pooled variance from individual variances. The parametric tests, F and Tukey, were employed when the parameter estimators were near to present the properties of linear model estimators, that is, unbiasedness, normal distribution and minimum variance. The first and second methods presented similar results, but the third method is simpler in calculations and uses all information contained in the original data.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-90162010000200014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Agricola v.67 n.2 2010
reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Scientia Agrícola (Online)
collection Scientia Agrícola (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br
_version_ 1748936461911064576