Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014 |
Resumo: | In biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood ratio method; and (iii) constructing a pooled variance from individual variances. The parametric tests, F and Tukey, were employed when the parameter estimators were near to present the properties of linear model estimators, that is, unbiasedness, normal distribution and minimum variance. The first and second methods presented similar results, but the third method is simpler in calculations and uses all information contained in the original data. |
id |
USP-18_09bdb4cbb824b82a5593fdc6ba709fdd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-90162010000200014 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-18 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression modelslogistic modeltreatments comparisonIn biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood ratio method; and (iii) constructing a pooled variance from individual variances. The parametric tests, F and Tukey, were employed when the parameter estimators were near to present the properties of linear model estimators, that is, unbiasedness, normal distribution and minimum variance. The first and second methods presented similar results, but the third method is simpler in calculations and uses all information contained in the original data.Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz"2010-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014Scientia Agricola v.67 n.2 2010reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/S0103-90162010000200014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,Lídia Raquel dePinho,Sheila Zambello deMischan,Martha Mariaeng2010-04-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-90162010000200014Revistahttp://revistas.usp.br/sa/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpscientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br1678-992X0103-9016opendoar:2010-04-26T00:00Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
title |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
spellingShingle |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de logistic model treatments comparison |
title_short |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
title_full |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
title_fullStr |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
title_sort |
Methods to verify parameter equality in nonlinear regression models |
author |
Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de |
author_facet |
Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de Pinho,Sheila Zambello de Mischan,Martha Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinho,Sheila Zambello de Mischan,Martha Maria |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho,Lídia Raquel de Pinho,Sheila Zambello de Mischan,Martha Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
logistic model treatments comparison |
topic |
logistic model treatments comparison |
description |
In biologic experiments, in which growth curves are adjusted to sample data, treatments applied to the experimental material can affect the parameter estimates. In these cases the interest is to compare the growth functions, in order to distinguish treatments. Three methods that verify the equality of parameters in nonlinear regression models were compared: (i) developed by Carvalho in 1996, performing ANOVA on estimates of parameters of individual fits; (ii) suggested by Regazzi in 2003, using the likelihood ratio method; and (iii) constructing a pooled variance from individual variances. The parametric tests, F and Tukey, were employed when the parameter estimators were near to present the properties of linear model estimators, that is, unbiasedness, normal distribution and minimum variance. The first and second methods presented similar results, but the third method is simpler in calculations and uses all information contained in the original data. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-90162010000200014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-90162010000200014 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agricola v.67 n.2 2010 reponame:Scientia Agrícola (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
collection |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agrícola (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientia@usp.br||alleoni@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936461911064576 |